公共工程项目廉洁管理研究
本文选题:反腐败 + 公共工程项目 ; 参考:《兰州交通大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:公共工程又称为非竞争性项目,是政府为了公众利益直接或间接投资形成的基础性建设项目和社会公益性建设项目。近年来由于经济的快速发展,我国在各方面的能力都得到提高,为了进一步提高人民的生活水平,我国在交通建设、城市规划、廉租房或经济适用房建设、校安工程建设等公共性政府投资项目中进行了大量投资建设。然而在快速投资建设公共工程项目的同时工程腐败问题接踵而至,由于公共工程项目是直接影响人民切身利益和国家综合发展的基础建设,在公共工程项目建设中存在腐败问题将直接导致工程质量存在问题,所以研究公共工程项目廉洁问题具有很重要的意义。论文在国家高压态势反腐的背景下,以公共工程项目廉洁管理为研究对象,在初步了解我国十八大以来的反腐建设及规范建筑市场领域的相关举措过程中,通过查阅文献和分析实事案例总结了公共工程项目建设在立项审批、设计、招投标、施工、竣工等环节的腐败表现,分析了各环节的腐败成因。并在运用舞弊三角论的基础上构建了公共工程项目预防腐败模型,提出三条反腐路径:(1)第一条防腐路径为减轻压力。政府部门或者公共工程项目建设相关单位具有腐败压力(动机)是腐败发生的首要条件。第一条路径从减轻诱发公共工程项目腐败的压力/动机入手,阻断腐败发生的第一个条件,具体实施措施如:提高公职人员的薪酬福利,缓解相关单位生存压力。(2)第二条防腐路径为消除机会。消除公共工程项目腐败机会是预防腐败的核心部分,腐败的产生往往是由于建筑市场不成熟、监督不到位和相关信息不对称导致的。第二条防腐路径采取的具体措施为规范建筑市场运行机制、构建项目集成管理平台、以政府部门为核心全员参与项目监督管理。(3)第三条防腐路径为祛除借口。借口是腐败的根源所在,是道德观念的缺失。祛除政府部门及公共工程项目建设相关单位的腐败借口,需要从廉洁教育和文化建设方面入手。具体实施措施如:坚定理想信念,加强廉洁教育,弘扬优秀传统文化,加快廉政文化建设,制作标杆和模范专题片,传播正能量。本文最后以两个实证为背景分析了预防腐败模型在防治公共工程项目腐败问题的作用,三条路径中任何一条路径都可以阻断腐败的发生。
[Abstract]:Public works, also called non-competitive projects, are basic construction projects and social public welfare projects formed by the government directly or indirectly investing for the public benefit.In recent years, due to the rapid economic development, our country's ability in all aspects has been improved. In order to further improve the living standards of the people, our country is building transportation construction, urban planning, low-rent housing or comfortable housing.School safety project construction and other public government investment projects carried out a large number of investment construction.However, along with the rapid investment in the construction of public works projects, the problem of engineering corruption follows one after another. As public works projects are the infrastructure that directly affects the vital interests of the people and the comprehensive development of the country,The problem of corruption in the construction of public works projects will directly lead to the problems of project quality, so it is of great significance to study the problem of cleanliness of public works projects.Under the background of national high pressure anti-corruption, this paper takes the clean management of public works project as the research object, in the process of preliminary understanding the anti-corruption construction and standardization of construction market field since the 18th National Congress of our country.By consulting the literature and analyzing the actual cases, this paper summarizes the corrupt performance of the public project construction in the aspects of project approval, design, bidding, construction and completion, and analyzes the causes of corruption in each link.Based on the theory of fraud triangulation, this paper constructs a corruption prevention model for public works projects, and puts forward three anti-corruption paths: 1) the first anticorrosion path to relieve the pressure.Corruption pressure (motive) is the primary condition of corruption occurring in government departments or related units of public works projects.The first way is to reduce the pressure / motivation to induce corruption in public works projects, to block the first condition of corruption, and to implement specific measures such as increasing the salary and welfare of public officials,Ease the relative unit survival pressure. 2) the second anticorrosion path for eliminating opportunities.The elimination of corruption opportunities in public works projects is the core part of corruption prevention. The emergence of corruption is often caused by the immature construction market, inadequate supervision and asymmetry of relevant information.The concrete measures taken by the second anticorrosive path are to standardize the operation mechanism of the construction market, to construct the integrated management platform of the project, to take the government department as the core personnel to participate in the project supervision and management, and to take the third anticorrosion path as the excuse to dispel it.Excuse is the root of corruption, is the lack of moral sense.To eliminate corruption in government departments and public works projects, we need to start with clean education and cultural construction.Specific implementation measures such as: strengthening ideals and beliefs, strengthening clean education, carrying forward excellent traditional culture, speeding up the construction of clean government culture, making benchmarking and model feature films, spreading positive energy.In the end, this paper analyzes the role of corruption prevention model in the prevention of corruption in public works projects based on two empirical examples. Any one of the three paths can block the occurrence of corruption.
【学位授予单位】:兰州交通大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D262.6
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前8条
1 邓丽珊;邓小鹏;谷甜甜;;大型公共工程风险管理研究[J];工程管理学报;2016年04期
2 陈建国;张礼卫;;政府公共工程管理的决策和监督机制改革研究[J];建筑经济;2016年01期
3 李维;吕彬;;基于舞弊三角论的装备采办里程碑审查舞弊问题分析[J];装甲兵工程学院学报;2014年03期
4 吕予阳;;强化工程廉洁管理有效监督的几点思考[J];南方论刊;2013年02期
5 张蕊;;基于欺诈“三角理论”的国有企业高管侵占型职务犯罪成因分析[J];当代财经;2012年05期
6 黎四龙;;会计舞弊三角形理论与舞弊审计[J];统计与咨询;2006年06期
7 吴祥明;公共投资项目管理的实践和探索[J];上海交通大学学报;2002年08期
8 陈峗,李彬,邹庆云;规范建设项目管理行为与建设工程质量[J];湖南大学学报(社会科学版);2002年02期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 丁心海;招投标廉洁风险防控机制研究[D];武汉大学;2013年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 王甲;完善中国反腐败立法的群众参与机制研究[D];河北大学;2016年
2 李汉;地方政府腐败治理中公众参与有效途径问题研究[D];吉林大学;2016年
3 姜舒;交通运输行业反腐倡廉建设研究[D];南京工业大学;2015年
4 王晓宇;建设工程项目招投标寻租治理研究[D];重庆大学;2015年
5 祁振兴;工程项目建设领域腐败问题及防控研究[D];大连海事大学;2014年
6 刘萌;上市公司财务报告舞弊识别分析[D];山东农业大学;2014年
7 吴剑峰;公共工程招投标领域的腐败预防问题研究[D];苏州大学;2014年
8 李婧妮;我国公共工程项目决策中的专家参与研究[D];西南交通大学;2014年
9 梁爽;基于工程建设领域预防腐败的系统研究[D];天津大学;2013年
10 周颖;工程领域的腐败现象的研究与对策[D];上海交通大学;2013年
,本文编号:1761551
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/dangjiandangzheng/1761551.html