腐败与企业成长:中国的经验证据

发布时间：2018-05-23 10:54

本文选题：腐败 + 企业成长　；参考：《经济学动态》2015年07期

【摘要】：东亚国家腐败环境中企业成长的悖论被称为"东亚难题"。本文利用世界银行2012年在中国调查的2848家企业数据,在使用直接和间接两种方式度量腐败基础上,就腐败影响企业的短期和长期成长机制进行了分析。结果发现:腐败对企业销售额增速和利润均在一定程度上有正面影响,且存在随企业规模增大,贿赂行为获得的经济收益存在逐渐上升的趋势;同时,企业贿赂存在最优规模,即随贿赂规模的上升,企业收益呈现倒U型变化过程。这在客观上形成了临界点前企业竞相俘获官员的隐性贿赂锦标赛。除规模外,企业贿赂官员的腐败现象也存在产业和所有制的差异,即不同产业、不同所有制的企业贿赂官员的收益和动机存在显著差异。基于此,要净化市场环境,促进企业合理有序的竞争,就必须减少政府直接配置的资源规模,消除企业通过贿赂官员等腐败行为所获取非市场竞争不当优势。
[Abstract]:The paradox of enterprise growth in the corrupt environment of East Asian countries is called "East Asian problem". Based on the data of 2848 enterprises surveyed by the World Bank in China in 2012, this paper analyzes the short-term and long-term growth mechanism of corruption on the basis of direct and indirect measures of corruption. The results show that corruption has a positive effect on the growth of sales and profits to some extent, and there is a trend that the economic benefits of bribery gradually increase with the increase of enterprise size, and at the same time, there is an optimal scale of bribery. That is, with the increase of bribery scale, corporate income presents a reverse U-shaped change process. This objectively formed a tipping point before the corporate race to capture officials of the hidden bribery tournament. In addition to the scale, the corruption of corporate bribery officials also exists the difference between industry and ownership, that is, there are significant differences in the income and motivation of corporate bribery officials in different industries and different ownership. Therefore, in order to purify the market environment and promote the rational and orderly competition of enterprises, it is necessary to reduce the scale of resources allocated directly by the government and eliminate the improper advantages of non-market competition obtained by corrupt behaviors such as bribery of officials.
【作者单位】：中南财经政法大学财税学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社科研究项目(13YJC790102) 国家自然科学基金项目(71403296) 中南财经政法大学百篇优秀博士学位论文培育项目(2014YB0301)的资助
【分类号】：D262.6;F274

【参考文献】