影响基层干部“为官不为”的体制机制因素分析

发布时间：2018-06-30 20:41

本文选题：基层干部 + 为官不为　；参考：《理论探索》2016年06期

【摘要】：基层干部中存在的"为官不为"现象,不能仅从行为人的主观偏好去解释,还需要从外部的体制机制去探讨。政府上下级间的层级关系和国家分层治理体制带来的信息不对称问题,给基层干部"为官不为"提供了博弈的机会;压力型体制下基层政府权责不对等和资源匮乏的困境,给基层干部"为官不为"提供了推卸责任的借口;干部选拔任用过程中能上能下、优胜劣汰机制尚未建立,给基层干部"为官不为"提供了投机的空间;现有干部考核评价机制尚难精确支持"奖勤罚懒、奖优罚劣",给基层干部"为官不为"提供了滋生的条件;现行监督体制的成本效益、虚置弱化问题和问责制度的不健全,给基层干部"为官不为"留下了活动的空间。解决基层干部"为官不为"问题,可以从全面实施政务公开、健全规范政府权责体系、健全完善选拔任用制度、改进干部考核评价办法、加强问责制度建设等方面着手。
[Abstract]:The phenomenon of "not acting as an official" in the grassroots cadres can not only be explained from the subjective preferences of the doers, but also need to be discussed from the external system and mechanism. The hierarchical relationship between the top and lower levels of government and the information asymmetry brought about by the country's hierarchical governance system provide opportunities for grassroots cadres to play games, and the dilemma of unequal power and responsibility of grass-roots governments and lack of resources under a pressure-type system. It provides a pretext for shirking responsibility for cadres at the grass-roots level, and provides room for speculation in the process of selecting and appointing cadres, and the mechanism of survival of the fittest has not yet been established. It is still difficult for the existing cadre assessment and evaluation mechanism to accurately support "reward, diligence, punishment, reward, punishment and inferiority," which provides a breeding condition for grassroots cadres "not to serve as officials." the current supervisory system is cost-effective, weak, and the system of accountability is not perfect. It has left room for grassroots cadres to "not be officials". In order to solve the problem of "not serving as officials", we can start from the following aspects: making government affairs public in an all-round way, perfecting the system of government power and responsibility, perfecting the system of selection and appointment, improving the methods of cadre assessment and evaluation, strengthening the construction of accountability system, and so on.
【作者单位】：中南林业科技大学;中共绍兴市委党校;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金一般项目“服务型基层党组织的服务机制研究”(14BDJ051),负责人佘湘
【分类号】：D262.6

【相似文献】