鲍罗廷与维经斯基有关中国革命问题思想观点的比较研究（1920-1927）
发布时间：2018-09-13 11:55
【摘要】：五四运动后的中国,具有初步共产主义思想的知识分子开始以马克思主义为指导思想探索中国革命,并与共产国际建立了密切联系。共产国际成为中国革命进程中不可忽视的重要因素。1920年,是共产国际与中国革命建立革命联系的开端。在中国错综复杂的革命形势下,这种联系主要表现在共产国际和苏俄(1922年后为苏联)政府通过派遣代表来华,帮助成立中国共产党并制定理论策略,直接参与国共合作的革命统一战线的建立等大量活动,实现对中国革命的帮助和指导。从1920年到1927年国民革命的失败,其间来华时间最长者当属鲍罗廷与维经斯基。共产国际与中国革命关系的相关课题研究中,学术界对共产国际驻华代表的研究著述颇丰,对鲍罗廷和维经斯基的针对研究数量亦相当可观,但却未有关于二者的比较研究。因此,文章将以《共产国际、联共(布)与中国革命档案资料丛书》等文献材料为基础,在学习和了解相关研究成果的前提下,对鲍罗廷与维经斯基对中国革命问题思想观点做一比较,以期从此特定角度为丰富和深化共产国际与中国革命研究奉献绵薄之力。本文之所以围绕鲍罗廷和维经斯基这两位代表进行比较研究,一是因为他们驻华时间长,驻华期间基本经历了中国大革命这一特殊且重大的历史时期,提出了许多有关中国革命基本问题的思想观点;二是由于二人特殊的身份,使得他们的思想行为与共产国际、苏联政府有密不可分的关系,值得深究。本文以1920年至1927年鲍罗廷和维经斯基对中国革命基本问题的理论和实践为研究对象,分析他们在中国革命领导权、国共合作统一战线、土地革命、武装斗争等问题的思想观点,辨析和梳理其中的异同,并在自己很有限的认识和研究水平的基础上,尽可能做出客观公正的判断和评价。本文在结构设计上,也大体按上述有关中国革命的几个基本问题依次安排。做此比较研究的目的与学术价值,在于加深理解共产国际与中国革命的密切关系,从而深化认识中国共产党把握中国革命规律的历史过程,从一个侧面考查马克思主义中国化的历史轨迹,加深对马克思主义基本原理同中国具体实际相结合的过程的了解和感悟。
[Abstract]:After the May 4th Movement, intellectuals with initial communist ideology began to explore the Chinese revolution with Marxism as the guiding ideology, and established close ties with the Communist International. Comintern became an important factor in the process of Chinese revolution. In 1920, it was the beginning of the establishment of revolutionary relationship between Comintern and Chinese revolution. Under the complicated revolutionary situation in China, this connection was mainly manifested in the Communist International and the Soviet Union (Soviet Union after 1922) government sent representatives to China to help establish the Communist Party of China and formulate theoretical strategies. Direct participation in the establishment of a revolutionary United front in cooperation between the Kuomintang and the Communist Party, and other activities to help and guide the Chinese revolution. From 1920 to 1927 the failure of the National Revolution, the longest time to come to China was Borotin and Vijinski. In the research of the relationship between Comintern and Chinese revolution, the academic circles have written a lot on the representative of Comintern in China, and a considerable amount of research has been done on Borotin and Vickingski, but there has not been a comparative study of the two. Therefore, the article will be based on documents such as the Comintern International, the United Communist Party and the Chinese Revolutionary Archives and Materials Series, and on the premise of studying and understanding the relevant research results. This paper makes a comparison between Bowring and Vickensky's ideas on Chinese revolutionary issues in order to enrich and deepen the study of Comintern and Chinese Revolution from a specific angle. This paper focuses on the comparative study of the representatives of Borotin and Vickensky. The first reason is that they have been in China for a long time, and they basically went through the special and important historical period of the Chinese Revolution during their time in China. It puts forward many ideas about the basic problems of the Chinese revolution. Second, because of their special identity, their ideological behavior is closely related to the Communist International and the Soviet government, which is worthy of further study. Based on the theory and practice of the basic problems of the Chinese revolution between 1920 and 1927, this paper analyzes their ideological views on such issues as the leadership of the Chinese revolution, the United front of cooperation between the Kuomintang and the Communist Party, the agrarian revolution, the armed struggle, and so on. On the basis of their limited understanding and research level, the author tries to make an objective and just judgment and evaluation. The structure design of this paper is arranged according to the above several basic questions about the Chinese revolution. The purpose and academic value of this comparative study is to deepen the understanding of the close relationship between the Communist International and the Chinese Revolution, and thus deepen the understanding of the historical process in which the CPC grasps the laws of the Chinese Revolution. This paper examines the historical track of the Sinicization of Marxism from one side and deepens the understanding and understanding of the process of combining the basic principles of Marxism with the concrete reality of China.
【学位授予单位】：西南交通大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D231;D16
本文编号：2241101
[Abstract]:After the May 4th Movement, intellectuals with initial communist ideology began to explore the Chinese revolution with Marxism as the guiding ideology, and established close ties with the Communist International. Comintern became an important factor in the process of Chinese revolution. In 1920, it was the beginning of the establishment of revolutionary relationship between Comintern and Chinese revolution. Under the complicated revolutionary situation in China, this connection was mainly manifested in the Communist International and the Soviet Union (Soviet Union after 1922) government sent representatives to China to help establish the Communist Party of China and formulate theoretical strategies. Direct participation in the establishment of a revolutionary United front in cooperation between the Kuomintang and the Communist Party, and other activities to help and guide the Chinese revolution. From 1920 to 1927 the failure of the National Revolution, the longest time to come to China was Borotin and Vijinski. In the research of the relationship between Comintern and Chinese revolution, the academic circles have written a lot on the representative of Comintern in China, and a considerable amount of research has been done on Borotin and Vickingski, but there has not been a comparative study of the two. Therefore, the article will be based on documents such as the Comintern International, the United Communist Party and the Chinese Revolutionary Archives and Materials Series, and on the premise of studying and understanding the relevant research results. This paper makes a comparison between Bowring and Vickensky's ideas on Chinese revolutionary issues in order to enrich and deepen the study of Comintern and Chinese Revolution from a specific angle. This paper focuses on the comparative study of the representatives of Borotin and Vickensky. The first reason is that they have been in China for a long time, and they basically went through the special and important historical period of the Chinese Revolution during their time in China. It puts forward many ideas about the basic problems of the Chinese revolution. Second, because of their special identity, their ideological behavior is closely related to the Communist International and the Soviet government, which is worthy of further study. Based on the theory and practice of the basic problems of the Chinese revolution between 1920 and 1927, this paper analyzes their ideological views on such issues as the leadership of the Chinese revolution, the United front of cooperation between the Kuomintang and the Communist Party, the agrarian revolution, the armed struggle, and so on. On the basis of their limited understanding and research level, the author tries to make an objective and just judgment and evaluation. The structure design of this paper is arranged according to the above several basic questions about the Chinese revolution. The purpose and academic value of this comparative study is to deepen the understanding of the close relationship between the Communist International and the Chinese Revolution, and thus deepen the understanding of the historical process in which the CPC grasps the laws of the Chinese Revolution. This paper examines the historical track of the Sinicization of Marxism from one side and deepens the understanding and understanding of the process of combining the basic principles of Marxism with the concrete reality of China.
【学位授予单位】：西南交通大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D231;D16
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 丁言昭;;瞿秋白与维经斯基[J];瞿秋白研究新探;2003年01期
2 丁言昭;;瞿秋白与维经斯基[J];瞿秋白研究新探;2003年02期
3 周利生;维经斯基1923年11月初来过中国吗?[J];党史纵横;2002年01期
4 姜建中;试评维经斯基对中共“四大”的贡献[J];佳木斯大学社会科学学报;2002年06期
5 胡云霞;李绍华;;俄共(布)代表维经斯基初次使华对中共建党的贡献[J];西南交通大学学报(社会科学版);2009年06期
6 姜建中;;维经斯基第四次来华时间考[J];世纪桥;2010年17期
7 方宁;;论维经斯基对中共建党思路的影响[J];党的文献;2011年03期
8 叶介甫;;维经斯基与中国革命[J];文史春秋;2011年12期
9 胡云霞;李绍华;;维经斯基初次使华与马克思主义在中国的传播[J];社会科学家;2012年03期
10 张继木;张昆;;组织传播视野下维经斯基在华新闻宣传活动述评[J];现代传播(中国传媒大学学报);2012年04期
相关会议论文 前4条
1 丁言昭;;瞿秋白与维经斯基[A];瞿秋白研究新探——纪念瞿秋白同志诞辰一百周年座谈会论文集[C];1999年
2 丁言昭;;瞿秋白与维经斯基[A];瞿秋白研究新探[C];2002年
3 丁言昭;;瞿秋白与维经斯基[A];瞿秋白百周年纪念-全国瞿秋白生平和思想研讨会论文集[C];1999年
4 丁言模;;瞿秋白与鲍罗廷[A];瞿秋白研究新探[C];2002年
相关重要报纸文章 前3条
1 颜文军;维经斯基与“建党伟业”[N];中国国防报;2011年
2 陈翔;北大红楼与早期党组织的不解之缘[N];中国文物报;2010年
3 黄纪凯;华侨：追随中国共产党开天辟地[N];人民日报海外版;2011年
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 崔晓东;维经斯基有关中国革命的思想述评（1920—1927）[D];西南交通大学;2003年
2 尹倩;鲍罗廷与维经斯基有关中国革命问题思想观点的比较研究（1920-1927）[D];西南交通大学;2017年
，本文编号：2241101
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/dangjiandangzheng/2241101.html
