论行政指导在治安管理中的运用
发布时间:2018-02-13 06:47
本文关键词: 行政 指导 治安管理 中的 运用 出处:《华东政法学院》2005年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】: 在我国加快建设社会主义市场经济和民主政治,努力构建和谐社会的大背景下,公安机关作为集民主与专政两项职能与一体的公共管理与公共服务机关,单纯依靠强制性管理手段开展治安管理,已无法适应社会发展的需要。面对人民群众权利意识的觉醒以及日益严峻的治安形势,在治安管理中逐渐增加科学、民主和公正因素,已成为一种巨大的社会需求。行政指导作为一种新型的柔性管理方式,自20世纪30年代在日本产生以来,因其具有的非强制性、灵活性等特点,日益受到发达市场经济国家的关注和重视,并越来越广泛地将其运用于经济与社会管理过程中,起着补充和替代、辅导和促进、协调和疏通、预防和抑制等多方面的积极作用,收到明显的成效。 本文认为,公安机关在治安管理工作中,不仅应依法运用法律赋予的行政许可、处罚、强制、检查等强制性管理手段,加强对社会治安的管控,而且还应借鉴吸收发达国家的经验做法,在依法行政的原则下,充分运用建议、鼓励、教育、引导、劝阻和协商等非强制性的行政指导方式,发挥其柔性管理手段的功效,配合传统的刚性管理手段,积极争取行政相对人的支持与配合,及时消除各类不安定因素和治安隐患,依法保护人民群众的民主权利和合法权益,维护良好的社会治安秩序,为社会主义市场经济保驾护航。 本文首先从公安机关参与构建和谐社会、平衡公安机关行政权力与公民权利、公安机关角色定位演变发展、解决治安管理突出问题以及借鉴国外成功经验的需要五个方面论证了在治安管理中运用行政指导的必要性,并结合公安机关的行政理念和我国民众的文化心理传统,论证了运用行政指导的可行性。同时,指出行政指导的有效运用离不开正确的定位。公安机关必须坚持在依法行政原则的指导下,正确处理好公安机关的权力性与行政指导的非强制性之间的关系,摆正行政指导在诸多治安管理手段中的位置,,扬长避短,刚柔并济,才能使行政指导在治安管理工作中充分发挥功效。 在此基础上,本文结合行政指导的功能和治安管理工作的实际情况,论证了行政指导在治安管理中的若干制度构建。指出应建立健全治安管理告知、治安防范提示、治安建议书、治安管理激励和治安管理示范等工作制度,使行政指导真正融入到日常治安管理工作之中,成为具体的、操作性强的工作制度,并转化为实实在在的工作成效。 最后,本文还指出,行政指导作为一种新型的行政行为方式,在我国行政理论和实务界尚属新生事物,对行政指导的行为性质、具体形式、程序规制以及救济方式等方面尚未形成统一权威的认识,公安机关对行政指导的了解、认同程度还不高,警员的专业知识和理论素养还不能适应行政指导的要求。要使行政指导成为一种较规范的行政行为方式,被公安机关真正认可与广泛接受,并有效运用于治安管理实践,取得预期的效果,还有待理论与实务界进一步的不懈努力。
[Abstract]:China has accelerated the construction of socialist market economy and democratic politics, and strive to build a harmonious society background, the public security organs as a set of two functions of democracy and dictatorship and the development of public management and public service agencies, relying solely on the mandatory management measures to carry out security management, has been unable to meet the needs of social development. In the face of people's right consciousness the awakening and the increasingly grim security situation, security management gradually increase science, democracy and justice, has become a huge social needs. Administrative guidance as a new way of flexible pipe, since 1930s in Japan, because of its non mandatory, flexibility, increasingly developed market the national economic interest and attention, and more and more widely used in the economic and social management process, plays a complementary and alternative, counseling and promotion Progress, coordination and dredging, the active role of prevention and suppression, and so on, have received obvious results.
This paper argues that the public security organs in the management of public security work, not only should be in accordance with the law by the administrative license law, punishment, compulsory examination means, mandatory management, strengthen the social security management, but also should learn from experience and practice in developed countries, under the principle of administration according to law, make full use of advice, encouragement, education, guidance, administrative guidance and negotiation way to discourage non mandatory, its flexible management effect, with the traditional rigid management means, actively seek the support and cooperation of the administrative relative person, to eliminate all kinds of unstable factors and security risks, according to the law to protect people's democratic rights and legitimate rights and interests, maintain good society the order of the socialist market economy, to escort.
This paper from the public security organs involved in the construction of harmonious society, the balance of the public security organs of administrative power and civil rights, the public security organs role development, solve the problems of public security management and the successful experience from abroad to five aspects to prove the necessity of the use of administrative guidance in security management, and combining with the traditional cultural psychology of the public security organs of the administrative idea and the people of our country, demonstrates the feasibility of the use of administrative guidance. At the same time, pointed out that the effective use of administrative guidance cannot do without the correct localization. The public security organs must adhere to the principles of administrative law under the guidance of the relationship between non coercive power and correctly handle the administrative guidance of public security organs, position, straighten out the administrative guidance in many public security management means the weaknesses, firmness and flexibility, can make the full effect of administrative guidance in public security administration work.
On this basis, combining with the actual situation of administrative guidance function and security management, to construct the system of administrative guidance in security management. It is pointed out that should establish and improve the management of public security informed, public security tips, security proposal, security management and security management demonstration work incentive system, make administrative guidance into the daily real the security management work, be specific, practical work system, and transformed into real work.
Finally, this paper points out that the administrative guidance as a new type of administrative behavior, is still a new thing in our country's administrative theory and practice of administrative guidance, behavior, and specific forms of Procedural Regulation and the relief methods have not yet formed a unified understanding of the authority of the public security organs in the administrative guidance, the degree of recognition is not high, the police professional knowledge and theoretical knowledge can not meet the requirements. To make the administrative guidance, administrative guidance has become a relatively standardized administrative behavior, the public security organs to be truly recognized and widely accepted, and is effective for the practice of public security administration, to achieve the desired effect, and the theory and practice further to make unremitting efforts.
【学位授予单位】:华东政法学院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2005
【分类号】:D631.4;D922.14
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前8条
1 莫于川;行政指导比较研究[J];比较法研究;2004年05期
2 莫于川;行政指导行为的合法性研究[J];重庆大学学报(社会科学版);2002年01期
3 叶必丰;现代行政行为的理念[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;1999年06期
4 童之伟;公民权利国家权力对立统一关系论纲[J];中国法学;1995年06期
5 莫于川;论行政指导的立法约束[J];中国法学;2004年02期
6 罗豪才,甘雯;行政法的“平衡”及“平衡论”范畴[J];中国法学;1996年04期
7 应松年;依法行政论纲[J];中国法学;1997年01期
8 叶必丰;法学思潮与行政行为[J];浙江社会科学;2000年03期
本文编号:1507563
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/gongan/1507563.html