恐怖主义犯罪及其防治对策研究

发布时间：2018-03-17 03:02

本文选题：恐怖主义　切入点：成因　出处：《山东大学》2006年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：本文从恐怖主义犯罪的概念出发，通过对分析恐怖主义犯罪的历史、现状、特征极其分类的研究，对国际公约、地区条约、各国国内法的相关规定以及中外学者对恐怖主义概念的界定分歧等问题进行全面的分析。文章力图通过这样的分析理清恐怖主义产生的根源，从而为恐怖主义的防治提供可参考的思路。文章共分七大部分，现将内容概括如下：在前言中，，作者认为对目前“恐怖主义”呈现出的严峻态势，国际社会面临巨大的挑战。而国际社会在反恐斗争中对于如何协调反恐认识和立场、总结反恐经验、增强和强化反恐措施等方面需要进一步反思、研究和改进。在第一部分，作者通过对现有的国际公约、条约及各国法律规定的考察，同时参照中外学者对恐怖主义的分析界定方法，阐述恐怖主义犯罪概念歧义丛生的原因，从历史观和系统论来分析恐怖主义并进行概念的界定，力求概念准确、科学而合理。第二部分，人们对恐怖主义的认识，与其在社会发展过程中不同的时期不同阶段的表现密不可分的。作者通过对恐怖主义演进的历史进程，结合恐怖主义现状来分析恐怖主义的成因。第三部分，作者认为恐怖主义作为一种社会历史现象，只要国际国内矛盾继续存在，恐怖主义的根源没有肃清，那么恐怖活动必将长期存在。而且随着社会和科学技术的发展，恐怖主义的发展也有新的特点。对恐怖主义犯罪的认识由于存在不同的立场、角度，导致对恐怖主义的认识本身很难达成一致。所以如何对恐怖主义进行分类，到目前为止仍没有一个统一的认识和标准。第四部分，多数国家签署的国际条约和公约为国际社会防治恐怖主义犯罪奠定了重要的法律基础。但同时也对传统刑法理念提出挑战，尤其是在“9·11”以后的反恐怖组织犯罪立法，对传统的刑法和刑事诉讼法具有特别的意义和影响。扩大的国际反恐怖主义犯罪立法在人权保障方面产生了问题。这个问题实际上反映了刑事司法之控制犯罪与保障人权之间的价值冲突。如何解决这个冲突?作者认为，任何情况下，保障人权都是第一位的。即现代的刑法必须总是使刑罚对恐怖主义犯罪发挥作用，都必须遵守法治国家的严格要求。第五部分，作者认为我国的反恐的立法、司法现状、反恐犯罪的模式基本上还停留
[Abstract]:This paper starts from the concept of terrorist crime, through the analysis of the history, current situation, characteristics and classification of terrorist crime, the international conventions, regional treaties, The relevant provisions of the domestic laws of various countries and the differences between Chinese and foreign scholars in defining the concept of terrorism are comprehensively analyzed. The article tries to clarify the root causes of terrorism through such an analysis. In order to provide a reference for the prevention and control of terrorism. The article is divided into seven parts, which are summarized as follows:. In the preface, the author holds that the international community is facing enormous challenges to the severe situation of "terrorism" at present. In the struggle against terrorism, the international community has summed up its experience on how to coordinate its understanding and position on how to combat terrorism. Further reflection, research and improvement are needed in such aspects as strengthening and strengthening anti-terrorism measures. In the first part, by examining the existing international conventions, treaties and national laws and regulations, and referring to the analysis and definition of terrorism by Chinese and foreign scholars, the author explains the reasons why the concept of terrorism crime is ambiguous. This paper analyzes and defines terrorism from the view of history and system theory, and tries to make the concept accurate, scientific and reasonable. In the second part, people's understanding of terrorism is closely related to its performance in different periods and stages in the process of social development. Combined with the current situation of terrorism to analyze the causes of terrorism. In the third part, the author holds that terrorism, as a social and historical phenomenon, as long as international and domestic contradictions persist and the root causes of terrorism are not eliminated, terrorist activities will certainly exist for a long time. And with the development of society and science and technology, The development of terrorism also has new characteristics. Because of the existence of different positions and angles of understanding of terrorist crimes, it is very difficult to agree on the understanding of terrorism itself. Therefore, how to classify terrorism, So far there is still no unified understanding and standards. In 4th, the international treaties and conventions signed by most countries laid an important legal foundation for the international community to prevent and control terrorist crimes. At the same time, they also challenged the traditional concept of criminal law, especially the anti-terrorist organization crime legislation after "9 / 11". It is of particular significance and influence to the traditional criminal law and criminal procedure law... The expanded international anti-terrorism crime legislation has created problems in the field of human rights guarantee. This problem actually reflects the crime control and the criminal justice system. Conflict of values between the guarantees of human rights. How can this conflict be resolved? The author holds that, in any case, the protection of human rights is the first, that is, the modern criminal law must always make the criminal law play a role in the crime of terrorism, and must abide by the strict requirements of the country ruled by law. In the 5th part, the author thinks that our country's anti-terrorism legislation, judicial status quo and the mode of anti-terrorism crime are still basically staying in our country.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2006
【分类号】：D917.6

【引证文献】