网络诽谤的犯罪预防与司法处置
发布时间:2018-03-26 20:04
本文选题:诽谤罪 切入点:网络 出处:《烟台大学》2011年硕士论文
【摘要】:网络诽谤作为当今社会一种较为典型的网络侵权方式,具有手段多样、隐匿性强、传播快、危害后果难以消除等特点。由于网络诽谤是新兴事物,而我国现行法律及司法解释对其规定的不健全,致使在司法处置中存在网络犯罪的认定标准不一、诉讼主体确定不准、管辖权争议多现、证据收集困难、案件性质不确定等问题。 本文从诉讼程序角度分析了网络诽谤的司法处置问题,总结了网络诽谤的现状及存在的问题,在此基础上提出了网络诽谤司法处置程序的完善建议。笔者认为,网络诽谤危害后果难以消除的特点决定着司法处置并不是解决网络诽谤的最佳途径,还应从建立完善网络传播内容的检测监督机制、网上举报机制、对网络服务商的约束机制等方面对网络诽谤犯罪加以预防,从最初环节开始对网络诽谤进行预防,使事前的监督预防与事后的诉讼追责相结合,从而能更好地解决网络诽谤犯罪的遏制问题。
[Abstract]:As the social network libel a typical network infringement mode, with a variety of means, occult, fast spread, characteristics of harmful consequences. It is difficult to eliminate because of Internet defamation is a new thing, and Chinese law and judicial interpretation of the provisions is not perfect, resulting in the identification standard of network crime in judicial disposal to be a subject of litigation jurisdiction dispute inaccurate, is more difficult to collect evidence, the nature of the case problem is not sure.
This paper analyzes the judicial disposal problem of Internet defamation from the perspective of legal proceedings, summarizes the current situation of Internet defamation and the existing problems, put forward on the basis of network defamation judicial disposal program suggestions. The author believes that the characteristics of the network is difficult to eliminate the consequences of libel determines the judicial disposal is not the best way to solve the network defamation, also establish and improve the network dissemination of the contents of the inspection and supervision mechanism should, online reporting mechanism for network service providers and restraint mechanisms to prevent crime of defamation on the network, from the initial link network began to slander the prevention, supervision and prevention of pre and post procedure accountable combining to better solve the problem of network control the crime of defamation.
【学位授予单位】:烟台大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D917;D925
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 肖永平,徐鹏;网络诽谤国际管辖权问题初探[J];法商研究;2003年03期
2 唐煜枫;;论诽谤罪成立之宪法限制[J];甘肃政法学院学报;2006年02期
3 董玉庭;主观超过因素新论[J];法学研究;2005年03期
,本文编号:1669369
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/gongan/1669369.html