我国刑事司法鉴定中立性问题研究
发布时间:2018-04-05 22:15
本文选题:刑事司法鉴定 切入点:中立 出处:《南京师范大学》2012年硕士论文
【摘要】:我国刑事司法鉴定制度近年来有了长足的发展,但是刑事司法鉴定的中立性仍然没有得到充分的保障,为了完善我国刑事司法鉴定保障中立性制度,需要借鉴国外保障刑事司法鉴定中立的先进经验,并针对我国保障刑事司法鉴定中立之不足,提出关于刑事司法鉴定主体独立特别是有条件的“侦监分离”、鉴定人资格完善、鉴定人责任等方面的优化建议。 本文主体主要分为四个部分:刑事司法鉴定中立性的概述部分主要阐述了刑事司法鉴定中立性的概念和意义,并且界定了其基本内容。我国刑事司法鉴定缺乏中立性的现状及原因分析部分主要介绍了我国刑事司法鉴定中立性缺乏的表现,并指出了导致这种现状的根本原因。刑事诉讼鉴定中立性的保障机制之域外考察部分主要根据我国刑事司法鉴定缺乏中立性的现状,对大陆法系国家和欧美法系国家保障刑事司法鉴定中立性的相关制度进行考察,如刑事司法鉴定机构的设置、鉴定人的管理,鉴定实施程序的规范、刑事司法鉴定主体的责任机制等,并在此基础上作出了一定的利弊分析。最后,在分析我国刑事司法鉴定缺乏中立性的问题以及对域外的相关制度的参考的基础上,对保障我国刑事司法鉴定中立性的相关制度提出完善的建议。主要包括刑事司法鉴定的主体设置和责任设置、鉴定实施程序的规范以及强化刑事司法鉴定的监督等。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the criminal judicial identification system of our country has made great progress, but the neutrality of criminal judicial identification has not been fully protected. In order to perfect the neutral system of criminal judicial identification,It is necessary to draw lessons from the advanced experience of foreign countries to guarantee the neutrality of criminal judicial expertise, and in view of the deficiency of safeguarding the neutrality of criminal judicial expertise in our country, put forward the independence of the subject of criminal judicial identification, especially the conditional "separation of investigation and supervision", and perfect the qualification of experts.The optimization suggestion of appraiser responsibility etc.The main body of this paper is divided into four parts: the outline of the neutrality of criminal judicial identification mainly expounds the concept and significance of the neutrality of criminal judicial identification, and defines its basic content.The present situation and cause analysis of the lack of neutrality in criminal judicial identification in China mainly introduces the manifestation of the lack of neutrality in criminal judicial identification in China and points out the fundamental reasons leading to this situation.Based on the lack of neutrality in criminal judicial identification in China, this paper investigates the relevant systems of safeguarding the neutrality of criminal judicial identification in countries of continental law system and European and American legal system.Such as the setting up of the criminal judicial appraisal institution, the management of the expert, the standard of the appraisal procedure, the responsibility mechanism of the criminal judicial appraisal subject, and on the basis of which, the author makes a certain analysis of the advantages and disadvantages.Finally, on the basis of analyzing the lack of neutrality of criminal judicial identification in our country and the reference to the relevant system outside the country, the author puts forward some suggestions on how to ensure the neutrality of criminal judicial appraisal in our country.It mainly includes the subject setting and responsibility setting of criminal judicial identification, the standard of appraisal procedure and strengthening the supervision of criminal judicial identification.
【学位授予单位】:南京师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D918.9
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 朱玉璋;国外司法鉴定制度[J];中国司法;2004年06期
2 郭华;;论司法鉴定统一管理的困境症结及破解路向——以全国人大常委会《关于司法鉴定管理问题的决定》为中心[J];中国司法;2007年03期
3 彭小吉;;浅析鉴定意见的证据能力和证明力[J];福建法学;2011年03期
4 赵杰;;论社会司法鉴定机构的公益属性[J];法学杂志;2007年06期
5 汪建成;;司法鉴定基础理论研究[J];法学家;2009年04期
6 江雁飞;郭志远;;司法鉴定之中立性问题研究[J];东华理工学院学报(社会科学版);2006年04期
7 王建华;论我国司法鉴定制度的完善[J];河北公安警察职业学院学报;2003年04期
8 张方;从两种鉴定类型的比较看我国司法鉴定委托权的归属[J];人民检察;2000年07期
9 陈光中;鉴定机构的中立性与制度改革[J];中国司法鉴定;2002年01期
10 孙业群;中外司法鉴定管理体制比较研究[J];中国司法鉴定;2004年01期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 董雪文;论司法鉴定的中立性[D];华东政法大学;2011年
,本文编号:1716711
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/gongan/1716711.html