侦讯程序研究

发布时间：2018-04-19 10:38

本文选题：侦讯 + 程序　；参考：《西南政法大学》2002年硕士论文

【摘要】： 本硕士论文约39，000字，由四章组成。第一章是关于侦讯程序的基本特征和原则。作者首先分析了侦讯程序的含义，指出侦讯程序是侦查阶段侦查机关按照一定的顺序讯问犯罪嫌疑人的步骤和规则，目的是为了获取犯罪嫌疑人的供述或辩解，并且指出侦讯和审讯、询问有重大区别，从而界定了本文的研究范围。通过对侦讯程序含义的分析，作者得出了侦讯程序的基本特征：对抗性、强迫性和侦讯结果——口供——的虚假可能性。由于口供具有可采性的前提是犯罪嫌疑人在自愿的情况下作出的，是自由意志和正常智力的产物，因此，作者在本章的第三部分提出：侦讯程序的基本原则是供述自愿性原则，并对供述自愿性原则的含义、理论基础和评判标准作了深入分析。第二章是关于侦讯程序的价值，作者从刑事诉讼最基本的价值目标——实体正义的实现、程序正义的实现和诉讼效率的提高——三个方面入手，分析了侦讯程序在刑事诉讼中的重要价值，指出由于侦讯程序具有印证和引导两个方面的价值，因此有助于实体正义的实现和诉讼效率的提高。同时，由于侦讯程序符合程序公正的参与标准、程序人道性标准以及有利于形成合理的诉讼结构，因此体现了程序正义。在本章的最后一部分，，作者提出，侦讯程序在以上三个方面的价值之间存在有冲突和矛盾，但由于侦讯结果在刑事司法上的重大利益，各国都在制度许可的范围内极力调和、平衡三种价值之间的冲突与矛盾，力图在不妨碍犯罪嫌疑人主体地位的前提下，尽可能地追求侦讯程序在实现实体正义和提高诉讼效率两方面的价值。第三章是关于侦讯程序的基本规则。笔者通过比较分析的方法，考察了国外各法治国家为了保障犯罪嫌疑人供述的自愿性而共同确立并为国际文献所认可的基本规则，这些规则包括讯问前的侦讯程序启动规则、讯问中的对强迫性侦讯的抑制规则和侦讯程序终结后的侵权救济规则。由于侦讯程序具有强迫性，因此各国都对侦讯程序的启动条件进行了严格限制，一般要求满足对犯罪嫌疑人进行了权利告知、犯罪嫌疑人自愿放弃了沉默权和律师到场三个条件后才能启动侦讯程序。侦讯程序启动后，为了防止侦查机关滥用权力，各法治国还制定了对强迫性侦讯的抑制规则，这包括对侦讯的时间、地点、方法的限制规则，对犯罪嫌疑人防御权的保障规则，侦讯结果的固定规则，对犯罪嫌疑人人身检查规则，对侦讯程序的司法控制规则。为了在侦讯程序终结后还能继续对侦讯程序进行司法控制，各国还制定了侵权救济规则，这主要是非法供述证据的排除规则。最后一章是对中国侦讯程序规则的分析。首先，笔者分析了中国侦讯程序规则的现状及其缺陷，指出中国侦讯程序规则虽然基本馈按照供述自愿性原则建立起来的，但和各法治国家普遍确立并为国际文献所认可的规则相比还有一定差距，并在制度设计上存在很多缺陷。然后，作者分析了这种有缺陷的侦讯程序规则形成的原因，认为原因是多方面的，有司法体制、经济状况、法律意识、法律效力体系、价值观等几个方面的原因。在本章的最后一部分，作者对怎样完善中国的侦讯程序规则提出了自己的设想，这主要是加强犯罪嫌疑人的权牙保障和对侦查机关的权力进行制约。
[Abstract]:The master's thesis is composed of about 39000 words and is composed of four chapters.
The first chapter is about the basic characteristics and principle of interrogation procedure in criminal investigation. The author first analyzes the meaning of the interrogation process, pointed out that the procedure of investigation and interrogation investigation stage of investigation organs in accordance with the rules and procedure in order to interrogate the criminal suspect certain, in order to obtain the suspect's testimony, and pointed out that the investigation and interrogation, ask to have significant differences. The definition of the scope of this study. Through the analysis of the meaning of the interrogation process, the author concludes the basic characteristics of the procedure of investigation and Interrogation: confrontational, coercive and its results may be false confession --. Because oral confession have the premise of admissibility is suspect in the case of voluntary made, is a product. Free will and normal intelligence so that the author in the third part of this chapter: the basic principle of the procedure of investigation and interrogation is the principle of voluntary confession, and the principle of voluntary confession The meaning, theoretical basis and evaluation criteria are analyzed in depth.
The second chapter is about the procedure value, the author from the fundamental values of criminal procedure -- the realization of substantive justice, procedural justice and improve litigation efficiency -- three aspects, analyzes the important value of the procedure in the criminal lawsuit, pointed out that due to the interrogation procedure has confirmed and guided two aspects the value, thus help to achieve substantive justice and improve litigation efficiency. At the same time, due to procedural justice in procedure of investigation and interrogation in accordance with standard procedures, humanitarian standards and is conducive to the formation of litigation structure reasonable, because of the procedural justice. In the last part of this chapter, the author puts forward, conflict and contradiction between the procedure in the above three aspects of the value, but because of the great interest in the interrogation of criminal judicial practice, countries have tried to reconcile within the permitted range in the system, balance three The conflict and contradiction between the value of the premise in order to suspect does not interfere with the main status, try to seek the interrogation process in the realization of justice and the two aspects of improving the efficiency of lawsuit value.
The third chapter is about the basic rules of the interrogation process. According to the comparative analysis, study abroad the country under the rule of law in order to protect the criminal suspect voluntary and jointly established basic rules and recognized by the international literature, these rules include the rules of procedure of investigation and interrogation interrogation start, remedy rule in interrogation rules of force inhibition of investigation and interrogation procedures after the end. Because it has forced the interrogation process, so all the countries on the procedure starting conditions were strictly limited, meet the general requirements of the suspect of the right to be informed, the suspect voluntarily give up the right to silence and to start the procedure of investigation and interrogation lawyer three conditions. After the interrogation program start later, in order to prevent the investigation organs abuse of power, the law also formulated the rules of restraining coercive interrogation, which includes the interrogation The rules for the limitation of time, place, method, and the protection of the defense of the criminal suspect,
The results of the fixed rules of interrogation and examination of suspect rules on the procedure of judicial control
In order to rule. At the end of the interrogation process was continued after the judicial control of the interrogation process, countries
The rule of tort relief is also formulated, which is mainly the rule of exclusionary rule for the evidence of illegal confession.
The last chapter is the analysis of the rules of procedure of investigation and interrogation China. First of all, the author analyzes the China.
The status quo and defects of the rules of procedure, Chinese pointed out that although the basic procedure of investigation and interrogation rules in accordance with the Fed statement
The principle of voluntariness is established, but it is universally established and recognised by international documents by countries under the rule of law.
There is a gap in the rules, and there are a lot of defects in the system design. Then, the author analyses
This is the reason of defect formation rules of procedure of investigation and interrogation, that for many reasons, judicial
The reasons for the system, the economic situation, the legal consciousness, the legal effect system, the values and so on.
In the last part of this chapter, the author on how to improve the rules of procedure of investigation and interrogation Chinese put forward their own
It is conceived that this is mainly to strengthen the right tooth protection of the criminal suspects and to restrict the power of the investigative organs.

【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2002
【分类号】：D918.5

【引证文献】