论我国的司法鉴定制度

发布时间：2018-04-24 02:20

本文选题：司法鉴定 + 体制　；参考：《华南理工大学》2010年硕士论文

【摘要】： 作为查清案件事实真相的一种客观公正的科学手段——司法鉴定,在诉讼活动中的作用和地位是越来越突出。司法鉴定的结论不仅关系到具体案件的判决,而且关系到整个社会司法公正的贯彻和践行。而当前我国司法鉴定制度中存在的缺陷严重影响了司法公平、正义、效率价值理念的实现。因此,对司法鉴定制度的研究有着重要的价值和现实意义,建立一套系统科学、规范可行、公正高效的司法鉴定制度是当务之急。笔者通过研究司法鉴定制度的基本概念、比较分析两大法系司法鉴定制度之异同,并立足我国司法现状,提出我国司法鉴定制度应遵循的基本理念和建立统一的、复合型的司法鉴定人资格确认制度,确保司法鉴定人的能力资质;将司法鉴定人定位于独立的诉讼参与人,确保其中立性;建立“一元两极”的司法鉴定体制和“当事人参与基础上的法官启动制”,在程序上保证鉴定人不受双方当事人的干扰,客观公正的出具鉴定结论;重构我国质证程序,建立庭前鉴定结论开示程序、建立鉴定人出庭作证制度、完善询问规则、建立“专家辅助人制度”,以保证有效的鉴别鉴定结论的真伪,使法官合理采信鉴定结论。建立起符合中国实际,适应司法活动需要的公正独立、科学规范、结构合理、职责清晰、管理有序、高效开放的司法鉴定体制,制订专门的《司法鉴定法》,是司法鉴定法治建设的最高目标和奋斗方向。
[Abstract]:As an objective and fair scientific means to find out the truth of a case, judicial expertise plays an increasingly prominent role in litigation. The conclusion of judicial expertise is not only related to the judgment of specific cases, but also related to the implementation and practice of judicial justice in the whole society. However, the defects in the current judicial appraisal system have seriously affected the realization of the value concept of judicial fairness, justice and efficiency. Therefore, it is of great value and practical significance to study the system of judicial expertise. It is urgent to establish a system of scientific, normative and feasible, fair and efficient judicial identification system. By studying the basic concepts of judicial expertise system, the author compares and analyzes the similarities and differences between the two legal systems, and puts forward the basic concept and unified judicial appraisal system in our country based on the current situation of our country's judicature. The compound system of confirming the qualification of judicial connoisseur assures the qualification of the judge and assures the neutrality of the judge by positioning him as an independent participant in litigation. To establish a "unipolar" judicial appraisal system and a "judge initiation system based on the participation of the parties", to ensure that the authenticator will not be interfered with by both parties in the procedure, to objectively and fairly issue the appraisal conclusion, and to reconstruct our country's cross-examination procedure, In order to ensure the validity and validity of the expert conclusion, it is necessary to establish the procedure of the discovery of the conclusion before the court, the system of testifying in court, the rules of inquiry and the system of the expert assistant, so as to make the judge accept the conclusion reasonably. To establish a fair and independent, scientific and normative, rational structure, clear responsibility, orderly management and efficient and open judicial expertise system that conforms to China's reality and meets the needs of judicial activities, It is the highest goal and direction of the construction of the rule of law of judicial expertise to formulate a special judicial identification law.
【学位授予单位】：华南理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D918.9

【参考文献】