加罗法洛自然犯罪思想研究

发布时间：2018-04-26 16:10

本文选题：加罗 + 法洛　；参考：《中国政法大学》2002年硕士论文

【摘要】： 加罗法洛的自然犯罪思想是犯罪学理论中一个较富魅力的话题，然而目前国内对其尚缺乏研究。为了对它能有一个较为深刻的认识和较为客观的评价，本文首先梳理了加氏自然犯罪概念的论证推理过程，然后提供了对理解其思想必不可少的理论背景知识，接着给出了一个加罗法洛自然犯罪概念的完整表述，指出加氏提出此概念的目的所在，随即介绍了他的自然犯罪思想的重要组成部分——自然犯罪人理论。在以上研究的基础上，结合当代的社会学与心理学理论，较为深入地剖析了加罗法洛自然犯罪思想的内在缺陷。又进行了加罗法洛与迪尔凯姆犯罪观的比较研究，，以更加深化对加罗法洛自然犯罪思想的认识。最后得出了本文的结论：加罗法洛自然犯罪思想是在特定的研究范式下得出的对于犯罪的一个错误的认识，对于我们研究本体的自然犯罪来说，它不可能提供什么有重大价值的东西。
[Abstract]:Garo Fallo's natural crime theory is an attractive topic in criminology theory, but it is still lack of research in our country. In order to have a deeper understanding and more objective evaluation, this paper firstly combs the argumentation and reasoning process of the concept of natural crime, and then provides the necessary theoretical background knowledge for understanding his ideas. Then, a complete description of the concept of natural crime is given, and the purpose of the concept is pointed out, and then an important component of his natural crime theory, the theory of natural offender, is introduced. On the basis of the above research, combined with the contemporary theories of sociology and psychology, this paper deeply analyzes the inherent defects of Garo Fallo's thought of natural crime. In order to deepen the understanding of Garoflo's natural crime thought, the comparative study of Garo Farrow and Dilkem's view of crime is also carried out. Finally, the conclusion of this paper is drawn: Garo Fallo's natural crime thought is a wrong understanding of crime under the specific research paradigm, for us to study the natural crime of ontology, It cannot provide anything of great value.
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2002
【分类号】：D917

【参考文献】