“轻罪”之法价值取向与人身权利保护

发布时间：2018-04-27 06:44

本文选题：轻罪 + 法价值取向　；参考：《河北法学》2005年11期

【摘要】：从中外关于“轻罪”的不同语境及其确定涵义论起,指出国外学者视角上的中国的“轻罪”,多指中国现行劳教体制所调控的诸种行为。进而阐述了近年来中国学界关于劳教制度存废之争的实质,指出改革论与废除论者本质上都是既要从形式上、又要从实质上改革现行劳教体制下的程序与实质不正义问题。因而改革论与废除论之间并无本质区别。进而,在阐述并评析了多种关于现行劳教体制的改革观之后,指出要解决劳教制度改革方案之争,须先行解决有关设计方案的价值取向问题。而各种改革之争,实质是功利主义优位还是人权保障优位之争。主张在不危及国家、社会根本利益前提下的“人权保障优位”的法价值观。指出单纯的“功利主义至上”,势必导致功利而不公平、不公正,甚而有违法治的正义原则。而作为正义基本蕴涵的公民在一定社会经济条件下的最大限度的公平与自由,正是人权保障得以实现的基本路径和期寻方向。因而人权与正义并不必然冲突。惟其如此,在一定平衡条件下的“人权保障优位”的法价值观,值得作为我们重塑有关“轻罪”方案时的立法价值取向。在此基础上,进一步论证了改革现行劳教体制的法理思考和立法构想。
[Abstract]:Starting from the different context of "misdemeanour" in China and foreign countries and its definite meaning, the author points out that the "misdemeanour" in China from the angle of view of foreign scholars mainly refers to all kinds of behaviors regulated by the current system of reeducation through labor in China. Furthermore, this paper expounds the essence of the debate on the retention and abolition of the system of re-education through labour in recent years in Chinese academic circles, and points out that both the reform theory and the abrogation theory are essentially not only in form but also in essence in reforming the procedure and substantive injustice under the current system of re-education through labour. Therefore, there is no essential difference between the theory of reform and the theory of abolition. Then, after expounding and analyzing various views on the reform of the current re-education through labor system, it is pointed out that the value orientation of the design scheme must be solved first to solve the dispute of the reform scheme of the re-education through labour system. The essence of all kinds of reform is utilitarianism or human rights protection. It advocates the legal value of "human rights protection superior" under the premise of not endangering the country and the fundamental interests of society. It is pointed out that the simple "utilitarianism supremacy" will inevitably lead to utilitarian and unfair, unfair, even contrary to the just principle of rule of law. As the basic implication of justice, the maximum fairness and freedom of citizens under certain social and economic conditions is the basic path and direction for the realization of human rights protection. Therefore, human rights and justice do not necessarily conflict. However, the legal values of "human rights protection superior" under certain equilibrium conditions are worthy of being regarded as the legislative value orientation when we remould the scheme of "minor crime". On this basis, further demonstrated the reform of the current system of re-education through labor legal thinking and legislative ideas.
【作者单位】：中国社会科学院法学研究所
【分类号】：D926.8

【共引文献】