司法鉴定启动权的归属和行使

发布时间：2018-04-28 12:30

本文选题：鉴定结论 + 司法鉴定　；参考：《上海交通大学》2008年硕士论文

【摘要】： 鉴定结论在案件处理过程中越来越显得重要,本文作者从司法鉴定启动权入手阐述司法鉴定启动权由司法机关启动和当事人消极启动两种启动模式,分析这两种模式的利弊,看到我国司法鉴定体制的弊端,看到由于司法鉴定机构缺乏应有的独立性,检察机关缺乏监督以及腐败现象的存在等导致司法鉴定启动存在这么多弊端。通过对英美法系在当事人主义诉讼制度下的司法鉴定启动和大陆法系的职权主义诉讼制度的司法鉴定启动制度进行比较,认识到英美法系与大陆法系的鉴定制度的互补倾向是非常明显的,英美法系的鉴定制度中的客观中立无疑是避免专家证人对委托方的倾向性,大陆法系的法官职权性质也是改善诉讼低效率的良方,从而认识到司法鉴定的启动应该由当事人和法院互动并相互监督和制约,对司法鉴定的启动权进行重新分配,由当事人申请启动鉴定,法院决定启动鉴定,引入专家证人制度来制约法院的决定权,通过这样的模式来真正实现公平正义。
[Abstract]:The conclusion of appraisal is more and more important in the process of handling cases. The author starts with the right of initiation of judicial identification and expounds the two modes of starting the right of initiation of judicial identification by judicial organs and the parties passively, and analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of these two modes. We can see the malpractice of the judicial expertise system in our country, the lack of the independence of the judicial appraisal institution, the lack of supervision of the procuratorial organ and the existence of the phenomenon of corruption, etc., which lead to so many malpractices in the initiation of the judicial expertise. By comparing the initiation of judicial identification between the common law system under the litigant litigation system and that of the civil law system of the authority doctrine litigation system, the paper compares the system of judicial identification of the common law system with that of the civil law system. Recognizing that the complementary tendency of the identification systems of common law and civil law systems is very clear and that the objective neutrality of the identification systems of common law systems is undoubtedly to avoid the bias of expert witnesses towards the client, The nature of judges' functions and powers in the civil law system is also a good way to improve the low efficiency of litigation, so as to realize that the initiation of judicial expertise should be redistributed by the parties and the courts, which should interact with each other and supervise and restrict each other. The parties apply for the initiation of identification, the court decides to initiate the appraisal, and the expert witness system is introduced to restrict the decision of the court.
【学位授予单位】：上海交通大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2008
【分类号】：D918.9

【引证文献】