当前位置:主页 > 社科论文 > 公安论文 >

论我国警察执法外部监督制约机制的完善

发布时间:2018-05-17 04:12

  本文选题:警察执法 + 监督制约 ; 参考:《西南政法大学》2011年硕士论文


【摘要】:“一切有权力的人都容易滥用权力”这是孟德斯鸠的名言,警察作为国家重要的治安行政和刑事司法力量,拥有广泛的权力,为了确保将警察的权力限定在法定范围内,就必须加强监督和制约,二者相互融合,不可分离。相对与内部监督制约的“自我监督”和“自我督促”,外部监督制约因其主体的广泛性,手段的多样性,突出的外在性而具有特别重大的意义。我国警察执法外部监督制约机制经过几十年的发展,已经初步形成了具有自身特色的警察执法外部监督制约网络,在预防权力滥用,提高执法效率方面发挥了重要的作用。但是仍然存在不足,比如监督制约机构并没有成体系化,整体功能不强,缺乏合力,注重事后监督而忽略事中监督和事前的预防性监督,公众警务监督流于形式,缺乏有效性,导致现实中监督不力,不合法执法与不合理执法问题频发。这就需要警务外部监督制约机制作有效的完善,形成对警察执法的全方位的监督网,一方面可以防止和纠正警察在执法中的不当乃至违规违法,保护当事人的合法权益,另一方面也有利于促进和保障警察更好地依法行政、依法执法。 本文从三个部分进行论述。第一部分,对警察执法外部监督制约的一般理论进行分析,详细的解析警察执法外部监督制约的内涵,特点以及必要性。进一步分析了外部监督制约的理论模式,包括政治学模式和社会学模式两种。为以下的论述作了铺垫。第二部分,主要论述了我国警察监督制约机制的现状,详细说明了外部监督制约的主要形式,并且指出了其存在的问题。第三部分是本文的重点部分,对完善我国警察执法外部监督制约机制进行了探索,具体包括健全权力监督制约机制、健全民主监督制约机制、加强各监督制约主体的协调配合、内部与外部监督制约相结合,注重监督过程的连续性、完善对警察执法监督者的监督制约五个方面。
[Abstract]:"all who have power are prone to abuse of power" is Montesquieu's famous saying that the police, as an important public security administrative and criminal justice force in the country, have a wide range of powers to ensure that the powers of the police are limited to the statutory limits. Must strengthen the supervision and restriction, the two fusion, cannot separate. Relative to internal supervision and self-supervision, external supervision and restriction is of great significance because of its extensive subject, diversity of means and prominent externality. After decades of development, the external supervision and restriction mechanism of police law enforcement in our country has formed the external supervision and restriction network with its own characteristics, which has played an important role in preventing abuse of power and improving the efficiency of law enforcement. However, there are still shortcomings. For example, supervision and control institutions have not been systematized, their overall functions are not strong, they lack joint efforts, they pay attention to supervision after the event while neglecting supervision in the event and preventive supervision in advance, and the supervision of public policing is mere formality and lacks effectiveness. As a result, supervision is weak, illegal law enforcement and unreasonable law enforcement occur frequently. This requires the effective improvement of the external police supervision and restriction mechanism and the formation of a comprehensive supervision network for the police law enforcement. On the one hand, it can prevent and correct the police's improper or illegal enforcement of the law and protect the legitimate rights and interests of the parties. On the other hand, it is also conducive to promoting and safeguarding the police to better administration according to law and law enforcement. This article carries on the discussion from three parts. In the first part, the general theory of external supervision and restriction of police law enforcement is analyzed, and the connotation, characteristics and necessity of external supervision and restriction of police law enforcement are analyzed in detail. Further analysis of the external supervision and restriction of the theoretical model, including political science model and sociological model. It paves the way for the following discussion. The second part mainly discusses the present situation of the police supervision and restriction mechanism in our country, explains the main forms of external supervision and restriction in detail, and points out the existing problems. The third part is the key part of this paper, which explores the improvement of the external supervision and restriction mechanism of police law enforcement in China, including the improvement of the power supervision and restriction mechanism, the improvement of democratic supervision and restriction mechanism, and the strengthening of the coordination and coordination of the various supervisory and restrictive subjects. Combining internal and external supervision and restriction, paying attention to the continuity of supervision process and perfecting the supervision and restriction of police law enforcement supervisors.
【学位授予单位】:西南政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D631.1;D630.9

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 陈利;论媒体与警察监督关系[J];福建公安高等专科学校学报;2005年01期

2 陈晶;;进一步推进警务公开的构想[J];公安研究;2006年09期

3 潘林元;;完善政协监督 共建和谐社会[J];消费导刊;2008年18期

4 李传良;;警察执法权力的边界与私权维护[J];湖北警官学院学报;2009年01期

5 晏志林;对公安机关执法监督的若干思考[J];北京人民警察学院学报;2003年06期

6 魏志荣;李先涛;;我国行政监察制度存在的主要问题与改革建议[J];黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报;2006年04期

7 郭正林,王小宁;关于地方人大设立监督委员会的探讨[J];清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2000年01期

8 刘雅彬;;浅析侦查程序中的司法审查机制[J];山西高等学校社会科学学报;2009年01期

9 王会;刍议如何建立长效的执法监督制约机制[J];铁道警官高等专科学校学报;2004年01期

10 沈亚平;关于行政监督的理论分析[J];天津社会科学;1998年02期

相关硕士学位论文 前4条

1 杨江波;公共权力监督机制研究[D];郑州大学;2004年

2 巴兵;地方人大对政府的监督研究[D];郑州大学;2005年

3 王凤明;论我国行政监督的改革和完善[D];南京师范大学;2004年

4 陈颖;我国人大监督制度研究[D];南京师范大学;2008年



本文编号:1899850

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/gongan/1899850.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户15e72***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com