劳教人员希望问卷的编制及其干预研究

发布时间：2018-05-25 01:46

本文选题：劳教人员 + 希望问卷　；参考：《西南大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：“希望”作为一种积极品质和心理机制,与个体的心理发展及健康状况密切相关。对劳教人员来说,希望则更具积极意义。本研究以Snyer希望理论为基础,通过编制劳教人员希望测查问卷,来探讨劳教人员希望特质的结构及特点；然后采用团体辅导方式,对其希望水平进行干预,以探索团体辅导对提升劳教人员希望水平的作用。本研究在文献综述、结构访谈及开放式问卷的基础上,以Snyder希望理论为参照,编制出劳教人员希望测查问卷。通过初测问卷的因素分析及考察其信效度后,最终确定了劳教人员希望问卷的正式版本。然后用正式问卷对劳教人员进行施测,并运用结构方程模型对劳教人员希望问卷的理论构想进行验证,同时对劳教人员的希望特点进行了分析；最后随机抽取24名劳教人员作为希望干预的对象,采用实验组、对照组前后测对比实验范式,实验组接受一周两次共八次希望主题团体辅导,对照组不予以干预,干预结束一个月后进行随访跟踪。最后通过劳教人员希望问卷等工具及结合随访跟踪结果来评估干预效果。本研究得到以下结论：一、劳教人员希望特质具有自身独特的结构,其希望侧面由社会希望、家庭希望、人际交往希望、工作希望、教育改造希望及娱乐休闲希望组成,每个希望侧面均由动力思维和途径思维两个维度构成。二、劳教人员希望特质的特点包括： (1)总体来说,家庭希望和教育改造希望水平最高,途径思维希望水平高于动力思维希望水平。 (2)在年龄因素上,越年轻,娱乐休闲希望水平越高,而随着年龄增长,教育改造途径思维希望水平逐渐升高。 (3)在文化程度上,文化程度越高,工作希望水平越高。 (4)在已服劳教期因素上,教育改造途径思维希望水平随着入所时间的增加呈现U型曲线关系。 (5)在独生子女因素上,非独生子女在社会动力思维希望水平上高于独生子女,而在娱乐途径思维水平上低于独生子女。 (6)在婚姻因素上,已婚的劳教人员在家庭动力思维希望水平上要明显高于离婚、未婚和其他婚姻状况的劳教人员；而娱乐希望水平则是未婚即其他婚姻状况的劳教人员显著高于已婚和离婚的劳教群体。 (7)在工作因素上,有工作的劳教群体除了在娱乐休闲希望上与无工作组没有显著差异,在社会、家庭、人际、工作、教育改造各个希望水平上都明显高于无工作的劳教群体。 (8)在户口所在地因素上,城镇户口劳教人员和农村户口劳教人员在希望水平上不存在显著差异。三、希望主题团体辅导能明显提升劳教人员社会希望水平、人际交往希望水平、工作希望水平、教育改造希望水平及自我效能感水平。
[Abstract]:As a positive quality and psychological mechanism, Hope is closely related to individual psychological development and health status. For reeducation through labour, hope is more positive. On the basis of Snyer's theory of hope, this study explores the structure and characteristics of the desire of reeducation through labor through compiling the questionnaire on the hope of reeducation through labor, and then interacts with the level of hope through group counseling. In order to explore the role of group counseling to improve the level of hope for reeducation through labour. On the basis of literature review, structural interviews and open questionnaires, the questionnaire is compiled based on Snyder's theory of hope. Based on the factor analysis of the initial questionnaire and the reliability and validity of the questionnaire, the formal version of the questionnaire is determined. Then the formal questionnaire is used to test the reeducation through labor personnel, and the structural equation model is used to verify the theoretical conception of the questionnaire. At the same time, the characteristics of the hope of the reeducation through labour are analyzed. Finally, 24 reeducation workers were randomly selected as the objects of intervention. The experimental group received eight group counseling sessions twice a week, while the control group did not intervene. The patients were followed up one month after the intervention. Finally, the intervention effect was evaluated by means of questionnaire and follow-up results. The conclusions of this study are as follows: First, the characteristics of reeducation through labour have their own unique structure. Their hopes are made up of social, family, interpersonal, job, educational, and recreational. Each aspect of hope consists of two dimensions: dynamic thinking and path thinking. Second, the characteristics of the desire of reeducation through labour include: 1) in general, the level of family hope and educational reform hope is the highest, and the level of path thinking hope is higher than that of dynamic thinking hope level. 2) the younger the age factor, the higher the level of entertainment and leisure hope, and the higher the level of thinking hope of educational reform approach is with the increase of age. At the level of education, the higher the level of job hope. 4) in terms of the factors in the period of serving re-education through labor, the level of thinking hope of the educational reform path presents a U-curve relationship with the increase of the time of entry. 5) in the factor of the only child, the level of the non-only child is higher than that of the only child in the social dynamic thinking, but the level of thinking in the entertainment way is lower than that of the only child. (6) in terms of marriage factors, the level of family dynamic thinking of married reeducation through labour is obviously higher than that of divorced, unmarried and other marital status. The level of entertainment hope is significantly higher than that of married and divorced reeducation through labor. 7) in terms of working factors, there is no significant difference between the working group and the working group in the hope of recreation and leisure, and in the social, family, interpersonal, work and educational reform, the level of hope of the working group is obviously higher than that of the non-working group of re-education through labour. (8) there was no significant difference in the level of hope between urban and rural residents. Thirdly, it is hoped that the subject group counseling can obviously improve the level of social hope, interpersonal communication, job hope, educational reform and self-efficacy of reeducation personnel.
【学位授予单位】：西南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D926.8

【参考文献】