论诱惑侦查及其法律规制

发布时间：2018-06-08 05:29

本文选题：诱惑侦查 + 价值意义　；参考：《山东大学》2010年硕士论文

【摘要】：当前,我国正处于社会转型期,各种矛盾频发,刑事案件数量呈逐年上升的趋势。尤其是一些毒品、武器非法交易以及涉及国家安全、职业性或团伙性的重大案件时有发生。这些案件往往极具隐蔽化、智能化,传统的侦查手段已经不能适应打击犯罪的要求。而诱惑侦查制度以其特有的主动性、诱惑性、秘密性特点,在实践中逐步被我国侦查机关所认可,在实践中取得了较好的效果。然而,令人尴尬的是尽管诱惑侦查在我国侦查实践中已经广泛应用,但在刑事诉讼法等基本法中却无明文规定。由于实践中,诱惑侦查没有得到很好的规制,导致侵犯人权的事件时有发生,可见,构建我国的诱惑侦查体制已经成为一个迫在眉睫的问题。本文以我国诱惑侦查的法律规制为主线,围绕诱惑侦查的价值意义问题、诱惑侦查的法律规制措施这两大核心,共分五部分展开研究。文章的第一部分对诱惑侦查的基本理论进行分析。首先对于诱惑侦查的概念进行界定,明确本文所研究的诱惑侦查应该局限于机会提供型这种情况,而不包括诱发犯罪意图型。在此基础上对于诱惑侦查的特征进行分析,指出其与传统的侦查手段的不同之处。然后,文章对诱惑侦查与警察圈套、卧底侦查、特情侦查三组概念进行辨析,更加深入地认识诱惑侦查这一侦查方法。文章的第二部分对诱惑侦查的价值意义进行分析。首先指出其积极价值,即打击犯罪、预防犯罪。其次,分析其消极价值,即可能对公民权利造成侵犯；违反了刑法的罪责自负原则；破坏社会诚信价值观念等。在此基础上,笔者对此进行分析,指出了仅仅看到积极价值或消极价值都是片面的,而应当辩证地一分为二地看待诱惑侦查的积极价值与消极价值,应当以长远的、全面的眼光看待打击犯罪与保障人权的矛盾。从法理和价值的角度来说,在严格规制的基础上,建立诱惑侦查制度有其必要性。文章的第三部分对国外诱惑侦查制度进行比较考察。主要选取典型国家对英美法系国家的诱惑侦查制度与大陆法系国家的诱惑侦查制度进行比较分析,目的是为我国诱惑侦查制度的构建提供理论和实践的依据。文章的第四部分对我国诱惑侦查的现状及问题进行分析,首先对我国诱惑侦查的现状及其所存在的问题作出分析,其问题包括定义模糊、立法缺失、相应配套制度的缺失。在此基础上对我国诱惑侦查基本态度进行了探讨。论证了我国建立诱惑侦查制度的必要性和可能性。文章的第五部分是文章的重点,主要论述了诱惑侦查的法律规制问题。首先对于诱惑侦查制度的具体建议进行论述,主要包括诱惑侦查的基本原则、立法模式、适用条件、程序控制、救济措施。其次,对我国诱惑侦查制度的配套措施进行论述,主要包括非法证据排除制度和警察出庭作证制度。笔者希望通过对于诱惑侦查制度的严格规制,使其能够在合法的范围内发挥它的积极作用,从而促进国家对犯罪的有效打击,最大限度保护人权,推进中国法治化的进程!
[Abstract]:At present, our country is in the period of social transformation, with various contradictions occurring frequently, the number of criminal cases is increasing year by year. In particular, some drugs, illegal arms transactions and major cases involving national security, professional or Gang nature have occurred. These cases are often extremely concealed, intelligent, and the traditional means of investigation have not been adapted. The temptation investigation system, with its unique initiative, seductive and secret characteristics, has been gradually recognized by the investigative organs of our country in practice and has achieved good results in practice. However, it is embarrassing that although the temptation investigation has been widely used in the investigation practice of our country, the basic law of criminal procedure law and so on. In practice, the temptation investigation has not been well regulated in practice, which leads to the occurrence of violations of human rights. It is obvious that the construction of the enticement detection system in our country has become an urgent problem. This article takes the legal regulation of temptation investigation in our country as the main line, focusing on the value and significance of the temptation investigation, and the temptation detection. The two core elements of legal regulation are five parts.
The first part of the article analyzes the basic theory of the temptation investigation. First, it defines the concept of the temptation investigation. It is clear that the temptation investigation in this paper should be limited to the situation of opportunity offering, but not the type of inducing criminal intent. On this basis, the characteristics of temptation investigation are analyzed, and it is pointed out that it and the traditional one. Then, the article analyzes the three concepts of the enticement investigation and the police trap, the undercover investigation and the special investigation, and more deeply understanding the investigation method of the temptation investigation.
The second part of the article analyzes the value and significance of the temptation investigation. First, it points out its positive value, that is, to combat crime and prevent crime. Secondly, it analyzes its negative value, that is, it may cause infringement on civil rights, violates the principle of the self negative responsibility of criminal responsibility in criminal law, and destroys the values of social honesty and credit. On this basis, the author divides it into a point. It is pointed out that only the positive and negative values are one-sided, but the positive and negative values of the enticement investigation should be viewed dialectically. The contradiction between the fight against crime and the protection of human rights should be viewed in a long-term and comprehensive view. On the basis of the strict regulation, it is necessary to establish the lure on the basis of strict regulation. The system of confusion and investigation has its necessity.
The third part of the article makes a comparative study of the foreign temptation investigation system. It mainly selects the typical countries to compare the temptation investigation system of the Anglo American legal system and the continental law countries. The purpose is to provide the theoretical and practical basis for the construction of the enticement investigation system in our country.
The fourth part of the article analyzes the present situation and problems of the enticement investigation in our country. First, it analyzes the present situation and the existing problems of the temptation investigation in our country. The problems include the ambiguity of definition, the lack of legislation and the lack of corresponding supporting system. On this basis, the basic attitude of temptation investigation in China is discussed. The necessity and possibility of enticing the system of investigation.
The fifth part of the article is the focus of the article, mainly discussing the legal regulation of the temptation investigation. First, it discusses the specific suggestions of the temptation investigation system, mainly including the basic principles of the temptation investigation, the legislative model, the applicable conditions, the procedure control, and the relief measures. It mainly includes the exclusionary system of illegal evidence and the system of police appearing in court to testify.
I hope that through the strict regulation of the temptation investigation system, it can make it play its positive role in the legal scope, so as to promote the effective attack of the state on crime, protect human rights and promote the process of the rule of law in China.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】