笔迹鉴定若干法律问题研究

发布时间：2018-06-23 21:56

本文选题：笔迹鉴定 + 鉴定程序　；参考：《湖南师范大学》2008年硕士论文

【摘要】： 全国人民代表大会常务委员会《关于司法鉴定管理问题的决定》,已于2005年10月1日正式实施,为我国司法鉴定的发展掀开了崭新的一页。这一决定对目前鉴定机构和鉴定人管理有着重要的规范作用,但对鉴定程序规定较少,较为原则。我国三大诉讼法对鉴定程序的规定也是较为简单、不明确,这使司法鉴定的日常程序性工作缺乏相应的依据。仅有《决定》不可能全面解决当前司法实践中有关鉴定的问题,鉴定制度改革应和诉讼体制改革保持同步,将其与诉讼法的修改和证据规则的制定结合起来通盘考虑。目前三大诉讼法都在进行修改,怎样运用诉讼程序来规范与鉴定有关的活动,保证鉴定结论的可靠性,保障司法的公正性,是一个值得深入研究的问题,也是司法鉴定立法的当务之急。笔者以笔迹鉴定为考察视角通过对外委托笔迹鉴定工作实践中遇到笔迹鉴定程序的启动、样本客观地收集、鉴定机构的选择、鉴定结论的审核认定及冲突结论的采信、是否需要建立笔迹鉴定结论的复核机构等问题,结合当前法律法规中存在的不足与缺陷,对司法鉴定的程序进行深入研究,提出合理法建议,有利于鉴定结论的客观真实,有利于保护当事人的合法权利,使我国混乱的鉴定秩序得到进一步规范。
[Abstract]:The decision of the standing Committee of the National people's Congress on the Administration of Judicial expertise, which was formally implemented on October 1, 2005, has opened a new page for the development of judicial expertise in China. This decision has an important normative effect on the current appraisal organization and expert management, but it has less stipulation and principle to the appraisal procedure. The provisions of the three major procedural laws on the identification procedure are also relatively simple and unclear, which makes the daily procedural work of judicial expertise lack the corresponding basis. Only the decision can not solve the problem of appraisal in the current judicial practice. The reform of appraisal system should keep pace with the reform of litigation system and combine it with the revision of procedural law and the formulation of evidence rules. At present, the three major procedural laws are under revision. How to use the litigation procedure to regulate the activities related to the appraisal, to ensure the reliability of the appraisal conclusions and to ensure the impartiality of the judiciary is a problem worth further study. It is also the urgent matter of judicial expertise legislation. From the perspective of handwriting identification, the author encountered the initiation of handwriting identification procedure, the objective collection of samples, the selection of appraisal institutions, the verification and determination of appraisal conclusions and the adoption of conflicting conclusions in the practice of entrusted handwriting identification. Whether it is necessary to set up a review organization for handwriting identification conclusion, combining with the shortcomings and defects in current laws and regulations, to make a thorough study on the procedure of judicial identification, and to put forward reasonable legal suggestions, which is conducive to the objective and true conclusion of the appraisal. It helps to protect the legal rights of the parties and further standardize the chaotic appraisal order in our country.
【学位授予单位】：湖南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2008
【分类号】：D918.9

【相似文献】