男性成年犯冲动性攻击行为的团体干预研究
发布时间：2018-10-08 14:53
【摘要】： 目前，国内的监狱干警开始越来越关注采用心理矫治的方式帮助改造罪犯。遗憾的是，在实践工作中心理矫治的尝试很多，但有心理学理论支撑的专业化心理矫治模型不多。同时针对罪犯的攻击行为做系统深入研究的也不多。既往的研究发现，罪犯的攻击行为多属于冲动性攻击，冲动的性格特点又影响了他们在监狱中的改造。因而，本研究尝试用团体咨询的方式以矫治男性成年犯的冲动性攻击行为，旨在改变或减少其冲动性攻击行为，提高自我控制能力，帮助他们更好适应监狱环境，更好地改造。 本研究自编了《冲动性攻击自评问卷》。该自编问卷分为攻击性自评和冲动性自评两个部分，通过因素分析各得到三个因子。攻击性自评部分包括攻击性表现、敌意和愤怒的情绪表现、敌意和愤怒的行为表现等三个因子；冲动性自评部分包括自我控制、冲动性和冲动性攻击等三个因子。本研究还自编了《攻击行为自评问卷》，通过因素分析得出躯体攻击行为、言语攻击行为、愤怒和敌意行为表现和冲动性行为等四个因子。经检验，两份问卷均有较高的信效度。 本研究采用《冲动性攻击自评问卷》筛选出具有冲动性攻击行为或具有冲动性攻击行为倾向的24名服刑人员组成干预组和对照组，设计了针对冲动性攻击行为的团体咨询方案进行干预。同时采用自编问卷、团体成员参与团体咨询后的心得、主观自评及自我报告、以及半结构性访谈对团体咨询的效果进行评估。 研究结果表明，，通过为期10次、持续三个月的团体咨询，干预组的冲动性攻击水平比干预前有所下降，并且在攻击性、敌意和愤怒的情绪表现、冲动性以及冲动性攻击四个方面达到显著改善。结合干预组成员的自我报告，可发现，通过团体咨询，成员自我控制能力提高，理性思考更多，开始学会使用合理的方法控制和宣泄情绪，面对冲突的应对方式更积极。干预组和对照组的后测比较说明干预组在愤怒和敌意的行为控制方面显著优于对照组。整体而言，干预组的冲动性攻击水平相比对照组有所降低，但尚未达到显著差异。 本研究表明： 1、通过本团体咨询，干预组成员与接受团体咨询前相比，冲动性攻击水平有所降低，具体表现为冲动性、攻击性以及愤怒利敌意的情绪等方面有所改善。 2、以合理情绪行为理论为基础的团体心理咨询是矫治男性成年犯冲动性攻击行为的有效手段。
[Abstract]:At present, China's prison police began to pay more and more attention to psychological correction to help reform criminals. Unfortunately, there are many attempts at psychological correction in practice, but there are few professional models supported by psychological theory. At the same time, there are few systematic and in-depth researches on the criminal's attacking behavior. Previous studies have found that criminals' aggressive behavior mostly belongs to impulsive aggression, and impulsive personality characteristics affect their reform in prison. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to modify or reduce the impulsive aggression behavior of male adult offenders, improve their self-control ability, and help them adapt to prison environment and reform better. The self-evaluation questionnaire of impulsive aggression was compiled. The questionnaire is divided into two parts: aggressive self-evaluation and impulsive self-evaluation, and three factors are obtained by factor analysis. Aggression self-evaluation includes three factors: aggressive performance, hostility and anger emotional performance, hostility and angry behavior performance, and impulsive self-evaluation including three factors: self-control, impulsive and impulsive aggression. The self-evaluation questionnaire of aggression behavior was also compiled in this study. Through factor analysis, four factors were obtained: physical aggression, verbal aggression, anger and hostility and impulsive behavior. The results showed that both questionnaires had high reliability and validity. In this study, 24 prisoners with impulsive aggression behavior or impulsive aggression tendency were selected to form the intervention group and the control group by "impulsive aggression self-assessment questionnaire". A group counseling program for impulsive aggression was designed to intervene. At the same time, self-made questionnaire, group members' experience after group consultation, subjective self-evaluation and self-report, and semi-structured interviews were used to evaluate the effect of group consultation. The results showed that the intervention group had lower levels of impulsive aggression than before, and showed signs of aggression, hostility and anger over 10 sessions of group counseling lasting three months. Impulsive and impulsive aggression achieved significant improvement in four areas. Combined with the self-report of the members of the intervention group, it can be found that through group consultation, the members' self-control ability is improved, the rational thinking is more and more, they begin to learn to use reasonable methods to control and vent their emotions, and to deal with the conflict more actively. The posttest comparison between the intervention group and the control group showed that the intervention group was superior to the control group in terms of anger and hostile behavior control. As a whole, the level of impulsive aggression in the intervention group was lower than that in the control group, but there was no significant difference. The results showed that: 1, the level of impulsive aggression in the intervention group was lower than that before the group counseling. Aggression and anger and hostility have improved. 2. Group counseling based on the theory of rational emotional behavior is an effective method to correct male adult impulsive aggression.
【学位授予单位】：华东师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2007
【分类号】：D917.2
[Abstract]:At present, China's prison police began to pay more and more attention to psychological correction to help reform criminals. Unfortunately, there are many attempts at psychological correction in practice, but there are few professional models supported by psychological theory. At the same time, there are few systematic and in-depth researches on the criminal's attacking behavior. Previous studies have found that criminals' aggressive behavior mostly belongs to impulsive aggression, and impulsive personality characteristics affect their reform in prison. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to modify or reduce the impulsive aggression behavior of male adult offenders, improve their self-control ability, and help them adapt to prison environment and reform better. The self-evaluation questionnaire of impulsive aggression was compiled. The questionnaire is divided into two parts: aggressive self-evaluation and impulsive self-evaluation, and three factors are obtained by factor analysis. Aggression self-evaluation includes three factors: aggressive performance, hostility and anger emotional performance, hostility and angry behavior performance, and impulsive self-evaluation including three factors: self-control, impulsive and impulsive aggression. The self-evaluation questionnaire of aggression behavior was also compiled in this study. Through factor analysis, four factors were obtained: physical aggression, verbal aggression, anger and hostility and impulsive behavior. The results showed that both questionnaires had high reliability and validity. In this study, 24 prisoners with impulsive aggression behavior or impulsive aggression tendency were selected to form the intervention group and the control group by "impulsive aggression self-assessment questionnaire". A group counseling program for impulsive aggression was designed to intervene. At the same time, self-made questionnaire, group members' experience after group consultation, subjective self-evaluation and self-report, and semi-structured interviews were used to evaluate the effect of group consultation. The results showed that the intervention group had lower levels of impulsive aggression than before, and showed signs of aggression, hostility and anger over 10 sessions of group counseling lasting three months. Impulsive and impulsive aggression achieved significant improvement in four areas. Combined with the self-report of the members of the intervention group, it can be found that through group consultation, the members' self-control ability is improved, the rational thinking is more and more, they begin to learn to use reasonable methods to control and vent their emotions, and to deal with the conflict more actively. The posttest comparison between the intervention group and the control group showed that the intervention group was superior to the control group in terms of anger and hostile behavior control. As a whole, the level of impulsive aggression in the intervention group was lower than that in the control group, but there was no significant difference. The results showed that: 1, the level of impulsive aggression in the intervention group was lower than that before the group counseling. Aggression and anger and hostility have improved. 2. Group counseling based on the theory of rational emotional behavior is an effective method to correct male adult impulsive aggression.
【学位授予单位】：华东师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2007
【分类号】：D917.2
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李平;;团体心理咨询:高校思想政治工作的重要途径[J];思想政治工作研究;2008年03期
2 韦志兆;;团体心理咨询理论与技术在大学生心理健康教学中的运用[J];学校党建与思想教育;2010年11期
3 杨晓梅;;团体心理咨询对少数民族大学生心理健康教育的实践及探索[J];黑龙江省社会主义学院学报;2011年02期
4 洪泓;;《罪犯心理矫治》实训教学的设计[J];职业技术;2010年10期
5 徐娜娜;;谈团体心理咨询在服刑人员改造中的应用[J];经济研究导刊;2011年05期
6 任忠文;解亚宁;赵静波;;驻藏某部队军人团体心理咨询体会[J];中国健康心理学杂志;2007年07期
7 韦志兆;;团体心理咨询技术在大学生犯罪心理预防与矫正中的应用——基于犯罪心理的人格诱因[J];思想教育研究;2010年01期
8 于芳;卫进东;;大学生人际关系和团体心理咨询的应用[J];法制与社会;2008年26期
9 ;“彩虹家园”帮家长解开“疙瘩”[J];上海青年管理干部学院学报;2005年02期
10 黄妹;雒力静;;“六个一”模式对提升大学生心理健康水平的分析[J];当代青年研究;2006年10期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 樊富珉;;团体心理咨询在我国的发展-回顾与展望[A];北京市社会心理学会2007年学术年会论文摘要集[C];2007年
2 樊富珉;;团体心理咨询与和谐社会建设[A];中国社会心理学会2006年学术研讨会论文集[C];2006年
3 叶苑;邹泓;;团体心理咨询在部队心理工作中的作用及运用[A];第十二届全国心理学学术大会论文摘要集[C];2009年
4 吴颖;;浅谈构建团体性作业治疗模式的可行性及必要性[A];中国康复医学会运动疗法分会第十一届全国康复学术大会学术会议论文摘要汇编[C];2011年
5 王强;王柏根;卢菁菁;王月琴;;团体心理咨询对重点高中学生心理健康的促进作用[A];中国心理卫生协会第五届学术研讨会论文集[C];2007年
6 贾p
本文编号：2257178
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/gongan/2257178.html
