东亚安全秩序的不确定性:现代性与后现代性的对冲

发布时间：2018-02-13 19:02

本文关键词： 东亚安全秩序现代性后现代性不确定性对冲文明中国崛起南海问题　出处：《外交评论(外交学院学报)》2017年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：近年来,全球失序的讨论增多,东亚安全秩序的不确定成为其重塑过程中的突出特点。本文以东亚安全秩序为研究对象,试图增进对国际秩序及其演变过程的理解。本文假定文明理念是塑造秩序的最深层次理念,试图从文明过程论的视角来理解东亚安全秩序的演进动力。本文提出,东亚安全秩序是文明过程塑造的,当前东亚地区具有普遍意义的文明理念和实践主要是现代性和后现代性,两种文明过程在权力、中心、普遍性和秩序等核心理念与实践上的激烈对冲,导致东亚地区相关行为体对于权力结构、安全规范和安全利益的认知出现重大差异,甚至采取了对冲性的政策行动,从而进一步放大了因物质力量重大变化直接导致的地区安全秩序的不确定性。本文指出,多元化、地方化和人本化是东亚安全秩序的发展趋势,其不确定性将长期存在;各方应以共同进化的文明思维,建设具有包容性的地区价值体系和秩序。东亚安全秩序的不确定性,实际上为中国塑造周边创造了重大的战略机遇。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the discussion of global disorder has increased, and the uncertainty of the security order in East Asia has become a prominent feature in the process of its remolding. This paper tries to improve the understanding of the international order and its evolution. This paper assumes that the idea of civilization is the deepest idea in shaping the order, and tries to understand the evolutionary power of the security order in East Asia from the perspective of the civilized process theory. The security order in East Asia is shaped by the process of civilization. At present, the concept and practice of civilization of universal significance in East Asia are mainly modernity and postmodernity. The fierce hedging of core concepts and practices, such as universality and order, has led to significant differences in the perception of power structures, security norms and security interests among relevant actors in East Asia, and even hedging policy actions have been taken. It further magnifies the uncertainty of regional security order caused by the great changes of material power. This paper points out that diversification localization and humanization are the developing trend of the security order in East Asia and the uncertainty will exist for a long time. All parties should build an inclusive regional value system and order by co-evolving civilized thinking. The uncertainty of the security order in East Asia has actually created a great strategic opportunity for China to shape its periphery.
【作者单位】：外交学院;
【基金】：中国—东盟研究院“教育部长江学者和创新团队发展计划”(项目编号:CWZD201405)资助
【分类号】：D731

【相似文献】