当前位置:主页 > 社科论文 > 国际关系论文 >

再论北周政权未实施九品中正制

发布时间:2018-04-17 03:29

  本文选题:九品中正制 + 选官制度 ; 参考:《陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年05期


【摘要】:虽然《北周六典》《西魏、北周时期的九品中正制及其作用》等著述中有北周政权任命过中正这一九品中正制实施过程中最为关键的职官,可是这些记载多出自碑刻等考古材料,其中有的记载时间有误,有的时间不确定,甚至有的碑刻本身真伪就存在问题,正如前辈学者所云:这些碑刻比之传世文献来说其史料价值还是存在一定的差距的。另外,虽然《周书》《北史》等典籍中存在有关北周政权"举贤良""举明经""举秀才"的记载,可是由于该政权统治时期没有任命过一个中正这一九品中正制实施过程中最为关键的职官,因此北周政权并没有沿用西魏政权所实行的九品中正制。至于北周政权未实行九品中正制的缘由,除了拙文《北周政权是否实行九品中正制》所做的分析之外,还应该与北周政权放弃了汉魏以来的职官制度而采取周六官制,改九品官制为九命制有关联。
[Abstract]:Although the Northern Saturday Canon, "the Western Wei Dynasty, the Northern Zhou Dynasty's nine-pin-zhongzheng system and its role", and so on, have been appointed by the Northern Zhou regime as the most important official in the process of implementing the nine-pin-zhongzheng system, most of these records come from archaeological materials such as inscriptions on steles and other archaeological materials.Some of them have errors in recording time, some are uncertain, and even some inscriptions have their own true or false problems, as the previous generation of scholars have said: these inscriptions have a certain gap in the value of historical materials compared to their handed down documents.In addition, although "Zhou Shu" and "Northern History" and other classical books, there are records about the Northern Zhou regime's "holding up virtuous" and "holding out the classics" and "extolling the scholar".However, since the regime did not appoint a key official in the process of implementation, the Northern Zhou regime did not follow the Nine-Pin system of the Western Wei Dynasty.As for the reasons why the Northern Zhou regime did not implement the nine-pint system, in addition to the analysis made in my article, "whether the Northern Zhou regime has carried out the nine-pin-zhongzheng system", it should also be followed by the Northern Zhou regime, which has abandoned the official system since the Han and Wei dynasties and adopted the official system on Saturday.It is relevant to change the nine-pint official system to the nine-order system.
【作者单位】: 陕西师范大学历史文化学院;
【基金】:国家社会科学基金项目“北朝时期民族认同及区域文化研究”(13BZS086)
【分类号】:D691.42;K239.25

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 苗怀明;唐代选官制度与中国古代判词文体的成熟[J];河南社会科学;2002年01期

2 程丽云;;简析选官制度对汉代政治的影响[J];商业文化(学术版);2010年05期

3 杨希珍;北魏的中正选官制度[J];山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1989年02期

4 于凌;李晓燕;;从“举贤良”看汉代的选官制度[J];黄河科技大学学报;2008年02期

5 张荣靖;;从选官制度看唐人入仕之艰[J];时代文学(上半月);2011年06期

6 杜文玉;五代选官制度研究[J];中国史研究;2002年03期

7 张涛;经学与汉代的选官制度[J];史学月刊;1998年03期

8 李俊娜;;近二十年两汉选官制度研究综述[J];黑龙江史志;2012年05期

9 王兴亚;;明代选官制度述略[J];黄淮学刊(社会科学版);1990年04期

10 仝晰纲;汉代选官制度刍议[J];社会科学;1999年06期

相关硕士学位论文 前1条

1 曹秀娟;论魏晋士人的争竞之风[D];南京师范大学;2015年



本文编号:1761880

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/guojiguanxi/1761880.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户0f7a1***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com