也谈“党的建设与马克思主义中国化”之“历时性”与“共时性”问题——与于安龙、刘文佳两位学者的商榷

发布时间：2018-04-20 13:18

本文选题：党的建设 + 马克思主义中国化　；参考：《郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年06期

【摘要】：于安龙、刘文佳两位学者运用"历时性"与"共时性"的研究范式探讨了"党的建设"与"马克思主义中国化"之间的互动关系,为"党的建设"与"马克思主义中国化"研究开辟了一条新思路。不过,于安龙、刘文佳二学者提出的两个重要论点值得商榷。于刘二学者提出,"党的建设"和"马克思主义中国化"的起点是一致的,都是中共一大。其实,二者的起点并不一致,"党的建设"开始于中共一大,然而"马克思主义中国化"的起点则并非中共一大,而是中共二大。于刘二学者还提出"党的建设和马克思主义中国化主体相同"的论点。这一论点也是有待商榷的。实际上,二者的主体并不是重合的,"党的建设"的主体是中国共产党(中共党员),而"马克思主义中国化"的主体则并非仅为中国共产党(中共党员),而是(包括中共党员在内的)广大人民群众。
[Abstract]:Two scholars, Yu Anlong and Liu Wenjia, used the research paradigm of diachronic and synchronic to explore the interactive relationship between "party building" and "Sinicization of Marxism". It opens a new way for the study of Party building and Marxism in China. However, two important arguments put forward by Yu Anlong and Liu Wenjia are debatable. According to second scholar Liu, the starting point of "Party building" and "Marxism in China" is the same, both of which are the first Congress of the Communist Party of China. In fact, the starting point of the two is not the same. "Party building" began at the first CPC National Congress, but the starting point of "Marxism Sinicization" is not the first CPC Congress, but the second CPC Congress. Yu also put forward the argument that the party building is the same as Marxism in China. This argument is also open to question. In fact, The main body of "party building" is the Communist Party of China (CPC members), while the main body of "Marxism in China" is not only for the Communist Party of China (CPC members), but (including the CPC). The broad masses of the people
【作者单位】：南京大学马克思主义学院江苏省中国特色社会主义理论体系研究基地;
【基金】：教育部高校示范马克思主义学院和优秀教学科研团队建设项目“思想政治理论课专题式教学设计与实践”(项目编号:16JDSZK011)
【分类号】：D61

【相似文献】