民族主义与民国制宪:“各民族一律平等”入宪考论
发布时间:2018-04-21 12:14
本文选题:民族主义 + 民族平等 ; 参考:《贵州民族研究》2017年07期
【摘要】:从吴经熊《中华民国宪法草案初稿试拟稿》到"五五宪草"的发展历程来看,"各民族一律平等"入宪并不十分顺利,且经历了两次条文内容的变更。其一度被删是因为宪法草案起草委员会初稿主稿委员焦易堂认为其与"人民一律平等"条重复,及傅秉常担忧其对中华民族造成分化。而其得以入宪及被修改的依据,均是孙中山的民族主义思想。时人互相批评,赞成或反对"民族平等"入宪,对条文的修改与解释等,主要源于各自对孙中山民族主义的取舍和理解。
[Abstract]:From the development of Wu Jingxiong's preliminary draft draft of the Republic of China Constitution to the "May 5th Constitution draft", the entry of "all nationalities equal" into the Constitution is not very smooth, and it has undergone two changes in the content of the articles. It was once deleted because Jiao Yitang, a member of the drafting committee's draft draft, said it duplicated the "equality of the people" article, and Fu Ping-chang worried that it would divide the Chinese nation. The basis for its entry into the Constitution and amendment is Sun Zhongshan's nationalist thought. At that time, people criticized each other, approved or opposed "national equality" into the constitution, and amended and interpreted the articles, mainly from their choice and understanding of Sun Zhongshan's nationalism.
【作者单位】: 云南大学历史与档案学院;
【基金】:云南大学历史与档案学院中国史学科建设项目阶段性成果
【分类号】:D693.0;D929
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 廖朝晖;;作为历史插曲的五五宪草[J];大经贸;2012年04期
,本文编号:1782391
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/guojiguanxi/1782391.html