斡旋中“背书”——“东盟对华关系协调国”新加坡与南海问题

发布时间：2018-04-23 05:17

本文选题：新加坡 + 东盟对华关系协调国　；参考：《东南亚研究》2017年04期

【摘要】：文章旨在探讨新加坡在出任"东盟对华关系协调国"期间(2015—2018)处理"南海仲裁案"阴影下的南海问题的背景与策略,进而理清"东盟对华关系协调国"在东盟对华关系中的作用。斡旋南海问题,是新加坡出任"东盟对华关系协调国"一职的职责所在,也是新加坡的外交目标之一。然而新加坡在出面协调中国与东盟国家之间的南海问题时,却因坚定地支持"南海仲裁案"而影响到自身同中国的关系。新加坡为"南海仲裁案"的多番、多种"背书"之举,引发了中国较为强硬的反对和反制。同时,也要看到,新加坡虽然无法"诚实""公正"地斡旋南海问题,但却为"南海行为准则"磋商、达成准则框架作出了努力,是最有可能在南海问题上"协调"出具体成果的"东盟对华关系协调国"。
[Abstract]:The purpose of this paper is to discuss the background and strategy of Singapore's handling of the South China Sea issue under the shadow of the South China Sea Arbitration case during its term as "ASEAN Coordinating country for Relations with China" (2015-2018). Then clarify the role of ASEAN-China Relations Coordinating countries in ASEAN-China relations. Mediation over the South China Sea is Singapore's duty as a "coordinator of ASEAN relations with China" and one of Singapore's diplomatic goals. However, Singapore's firm support for the South China Sea arbitration has affected its relations with China when it came forward to coordinate the South China Sea issue between China and ASEAN countries. Singapore's repeated and various endorsements for the South China Sea arbitration case have triggered China's stronger opposition and counter-action. At the same time, we should also note that although Singapore is unable to mediate the South China Sea issue "honestly" and "impartially", it has made efforts to negotiate and reach a framework for such a code of conduct in the South China Sea. Is the most likely to "coordinate" concrete results on the South China Sea issue, "ASEAN relations with China."
【作者单位】：暨南大学国际关系学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大项目“构建21世纪海上丝绸之路的社会和文化基础研究”(14ZDB112)
【分类号】：D833.9

【相似文献】