共同体视阈下中国学术话语权发展路径的转换

发布时间：2018-04-29 14:32

本文选题：学术共同体 + 学术话语权　；参考：《湖北民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年05期

【摘要】：面对西方话语霸权的冲击,中国学术界提出三种应对思路:国际化、本土化和洋为中用。三种思路在本质上是相同的,即对抗性诉求。全球学术界可视为一个学术共同体。共同体内,学术话语权是在知识生产和知识传播的过程中实现的。提升学术话语权只能依靠知识生产的质量、知识表达的特色以及知识传播的广度等交流性诉求。因此,中国学术话语权的发展路径应从对抗性诉求转向交流性诉求,从西方话语研究中国到中国话语研究世界。具体而言,中国学术界应从专注"自我"研究转向"自我"研究与"世界"研究并重,通过研究领域的扩大来提升知识生产的质量;以中国的话语而不是西方话语来表达自己的发现,凸显知识表述的特色;在此基础上,积极与全球学术共同体交流沟通,扩大知识传播的广度,以此,推动全球学术话语体系结构变化,提升中国学术话语权。
[Abstract]:In the face of the impact of western discourse hegemony, Chinese academic circles put forward three countermeasures: internationalization, localization and the use of foreign countries. The three ideas are essentially the same, that is, adversarial demands. Global academia can be seen as an academic community. In the community, the right of academic discourse is realized in the process of knowledge production and knowledge dissemination. The promotion of academic discourse can only depend on the quality of knowledge production, the characteristics of knowledge expression and the breadth of knowledge dissemination. Therefore, the development path of Chinese academic discourse right should change from adversarial appeal to communicative demand, from western discourse research China to Chinese discourse research world. In particular, Chinese academic circles should shift from focusing on "self" research to "self" research and "world" research, and improve the quality of knowledge production through the expansion of research field. To express their findings in Chinese rather than Western discourse, to highlight the characteristics of knowledge expression; on this basis, to actively communicate with the global academic community and to expand the scope of knowledge dissemination. Promote the change of global academic discourse system structure and promote Chinese academic discourse right.
【作者单位】：湖北民族学院马克思主义学院;
【基金】：湖北省教育厅高校人文社科研究一般项目“留守村民‘圈子’研究”的阶段性成果(项目编号:16Y116) 湖北民族学院博士科研启动基金项目“冀南宋庄内外圈子中的互惠、格局与类型”的阶段性成果(项目编号:MY2015B042)
【分类号】：D61

【相似文献】