濮阳市三种主流养老模式比较研究

发布时间：2018-05-08 05:05

本文选题：养老模式 + 社区养老　；参考：《华中师范大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：伴随着我国逐渐加快的老龄化进程,我国老年人口的数量呈现不断增长的趋势,传统的家庭养老方式已经逐渐不能满足老年人的养老需求,这就急需我们转变观念,探索新的养老模式。进入21世纪后,多种多样的新型养老模式层出不穷,然而什么样的养老模式才是最适合现阶段的社会发展的?什么样的养老模式才是最适合濮阳市地区实际情况的?这是本文笔者探讨的重点问题。在文章的撰写过程中,笔者主要采用了实地调查的研究方法,辅之以文献研究、个案访谈等研究方法。在查阅了大量资料,了解了我国现存的多种养老模式的基础上,深入实地,结合濮阳市地区经济发展、地理位置、文化传统等因素,围绕该地区主流的三种养老模式的发展状况展开分析。本文以濮阳市地区为调查对象,详细阐述了现阶段濮阳市地区主流的三种养老模式——家庭养老、社区养老、机构养老,在全面分析的基础上,结合濮阳市地区的具体情况,比较分析了三者的各自优势和不同之处。通过比较分析,社区养老在目前的主流养老模式之中综合优势明显,既能缓解家庭养老的压力,又能弥补机构养老的缺陷。虽然在当今经济发展水平条件下,社区养老模式的发展尚且面临许多困难和障碍,但总的来说,该模式在我国现存条件下可行性较大,应当作为濮阳市政府在养老模式方面的重点发展道路。
[Abstract]:Along with the aging process of our country, the number of the elderly population in our country is increasing continuously, the traditional family old-age support way has been unable to satisfy the old people's old-age demand gradually, this urgently needs us to change the idea. Explore a new pension model. After entering the 21st century, a variety of new pension models emerge in endlessly, but what kind of pension model is the most suitable for the current social development? What kind of pension model is the most suitable for the actual situation in Puyang City? This is the author of this article to explore the key issues. In the process of writing the article, the author mainly adopts the research method of field investigation, supplemented by literature research, case interview and other research methods. On the basis of consulting a large number of materials and understanding the existing various pension models in our country, we went deep into the field and combined with factors such as economic development, geographical location, cultural tradition in Puyang City, and so on. Around this area mainstream three kinds of endowment pattern development condition launches the analysis. This article takes Puyang area as the investigation object, elaborated in detail at present Puyang area mainstream three kinds of old-age support pattern-family endowment, community old-age care, the organization old-age support, in the comprehensive analysis foundation, unifies the Puyang area concrete situation, Their respective advantages and differences are compared and analyzed. Through comparative analysis, the comprehensive advantage of community pension in the current mainstream pension model is obvious, which can not only alleviate the pressure of family pension, but also make up for the defects of institutional pension. Although there are still many difficulties and obstacles in the development of the community pension model under the current economic development level, in general, the model is more feasible under the existing conditions in our country. It should be the key development road of Puyang city government in endowment model.
【学位授予单位】：华中师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D669.6

【参考文献】