政策网络视域下专家的政策参与

发布时间：2018-05-28 19:47

本文选题：政策网络 + 专家　；参考：《大连理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年03期

【摘要】：已有学者研究认为从损失者嵌入性(涉及政策网络)和知识复杂性(涉及政策问题)两个维度构建了政策变迁中专家参与模式的理论框架,在学术界产生较大反响。然而,在其研究中并未对"专家本身"的差异进行太多探讨,"专家"是一个被忽略的变量。假如将政策网络和政策问题两个变量恒定不变,对我国情景下的复杂政策网络进行考察,可发现专家与参与模式之间存在相关性,简单概括为嵌入性强、以追求信念或利益为主要动机以及资源优势较明显的专家多采用直接的或激进的方式;相反,嵌入性弱、以提升学术地位或实现学术价值为主要动机以及资源优势较差的专家多采用间接的或较为安全的参与方式。怒江水电开发的案例研究可为该观点提供佐证。
[Abstract]:Some scholars believe that the theoretical framework of expert participation model in policy change is constructed from the two dimensions of loss embedding (involving policy network) and knowledge complexity (involving policy issues), which has a great impact in academic circles. However, there is not much discussion about the difference between the experts themselves, which is a neglected variable. If the two variables of policy network and policy problem are invariable and the complex policy network under the situation of our country is investigated, it can be found that there is a correlation between experts and participation model, which can be summed up as strong embeddedness. Experts whose main motivation is the pursuit of beliefs or interests and whose resource advantages are more obvious are more direct or radical; on the contrary, embedding is weak, The experts whose main motivation is to promote academic status or realize academic value and resource advantages are poor adopt indirect or safer way of participation. The case study of Nujiang hydropower development can provide evidence for this view.
【作者单位】：山东科技大学文法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金重点项目:“国家治理现代化视域下的中国政府治理模式改革研究”(15AGL017)
【分类号】：D621.5

【相似文献】