国与族:文明认同、身份认知与中新关系
发布时间:2018-06-09 01:10
本文选题:中新关系 + 李光耀 ; 参考:《外交评论(外交学院学报)》2017年02期
【摘要】:在分析国与国之间合作或冲突的成因时,种族这一因素越来越受到国际关系学者的重视。学界已有的研究几乎都支持种族亲缘性导向和促进国际合作。中新关系的实践则打破了这一刻板逻辑,并支持另一种思路:在一些情况下,同文同种恰恰会给两国带来敌意而不是通常所想当然的合作。在中国崛起的背景下,这一中新关系案例也给如何理解和预测中国目前和将来的对外行为,及其对重塑世界秩序的影响提出了思考点。其中一个重要的面向是"文明"。族的文明认同在中新关系中所扮演的突出角色,再一次提醒我们在民族国家的框架内思考国际关系的局限性。随着中华文明这一最大文明体的复兴以及中国在影响和定义世界秩序上发挥越来越重要的作用,以文明思维来补充民族主义思维将成为国际关系研究的发展要求,文明作为跨国文化场域应成为国际关系的分析单位。鉴于此,有关中新关系的研究显示出对重塑国际关系理论框架的重要潜在意义。
[Abstract]:In analyzing the causes of cooperation or conflict between countries, race has been paid more and more attention by scholars of international relations. Almost all the studies in academic circles support racial kinship orientation and promote international cooperation. The practice of Sino-Singaporean relations breaks the logic of the moment and supports another idea: in some cases, homogeneity brings hostility to the two countries rather than the usual assumption of cooperation. Against the background of China's rise, this new Sino-Chinese relationship case also gives some thoughts on how to understand and predict China's current and future foreign behavior and its impact on reshaping the world order. One important aspect is civilization. The prominent role of ethnic civilization identity in the Sino-Singapore relationship reminds us once again of the limitations of international relations within the framework of nation-state. With the rejuvenation of the Chinese civilization, the largest civilized body, and China's more and more important role in influencing and defining the world order, it will become a requirement for the development of international relations to supplement the nationalist thinking with civilized thinking. Civilization, as a field of transnational culture, should be an analytical unit of international relations. In view of this, the research on the relationship between China and Singapore shows the important potential significance for reshaping the theoretical framework of international relations.
【作者单位】: 南洋理工大学人文与社会科学院;
【分类号】:D822.333.9
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 薄智跃;;李光耀的国际观[J];深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版);2010年03期
2 汪晖,,张天蔚;文化批判理论与当代中国民族主义问题[J];战略与管理;1994年04期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前4条
1 陈纳慧;;国与族:文明认同、身份认知与中新关系[J];外交评论(外交学院学报);2017年02期
2 王臻;;中韩历史研究中的民族主义与爱国主义认识论[J];学术界;2017年01期
3 贺玉高;;“国民性”论争与当代知识界的二元对立思维[J];文艺理论研究;2016年06期
4 王湘宁;;新加坡与中国民族政策对比[J];贵州大学学报(社会科学版);2015年05期
本文编号:1998101
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/guojiguanxi/1998101.html