“一国两制”台湾模式理论的现实障碍研究

发布时间：2018-06-11 20:15

  本文选题：一国两制 + 台湾模式　； 参考：《西安建筑科技大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：改革开放以来,我国经济、政治实力不断增强,在“一国两制”理论指导下,香港、澳门回归祖国怀抱,但台湾问题至今未能解决,祖国尚未实现真正意义上的统一。梳理“一国两制”理论的知识,掌握“一国两制”台湾模式的关系及特点,分析其发展过程,既能推动“一国两制”理论的发展,丰富马克思主义国家学说,也利于推动当前两岸关系的发展。研究“一国两制”台湾模式理论的现实障碍,探究消除障碍的措施,对于实现两岸和平统一,具有重要的理论意义和现实意义。论文以“‘一国两制’台湾模式理论的现实障碍研究”为选题,通过文献分析法对“一国两制”台湾模式的相关理论进行梳理,运用比较分析法对台湾模式和港澳模式进行比较,以期推动既有理论的创新与发展。论文在梳理“一国两制”理论的形成、发展及实践的基础上,分别考察了该理论在制度设计及实际运用方面存在的诸多障碍,在进一步分析上述障碍的原因基础上,论文提出了与之相对应的宏观对策。例如,以“特别政治地位”的方式满足台湾对“地位平等”的追求,以经济手段实现台湾的“主权”追求,并由大陆授权台湾在军事领域“治权”等措施来完善“一国两制”台湾模式的理论设计。在实践中须加强与台湾官方、民间的接触与交流,同时在国际上展开积极外交,以此推动祖国早日实现真正意义的和平统一。在解决台湾问题这一议题上,“一国两制”台湾模式是实现两岸共同繁荣发展的最佳方式。论文认为:由于长期的分离和隔阂,要实现两岸和平统一,大陆单方面的努力远远不够,需要台湾积极参与协商。本文的创新之处在于对“一国两制”台湾模式进行“分板块”分析,从既有理论设计和两岸现实的角度入手研究现实障碍,通过借鉴“联邦制”的某些特点,给予台湾一定的“对等地位”。
[Abstract]:Since the reform and opening up, China's economic and political strength has been continuously strengthened. Under the guidance of the "one country, two systems" theory, Hong Kong and Macao have returned to the embrace of the motherland, but the Taiwan issue has not yet been resolved, and the motherland has not yet realized real reunification. Combing the knowledge of the theory of "one country, two systems", mastering the relationship and characteristics of the "one country, two systems" Taiwan model, and analyzing its development process can not only promote the development of the theory of "one country, two systems", but also enrich the Marxist theory of state. It is also conducive to promoting the development of current cross-strait relations. It is of great theoretical and practical significance to study the practical obstacles of the Taiwan model of "one country, two systems" and to explore the measures to remove the obstacles for realizing the peaceful reunification of the two sides of the strait. Based on the topic of "study on the practical obstacles of the" one country, two systems "Taiwan model theory, this paper combs the relevant theories of" one country, two systems "Taiwan model through literature analysis. In order to promote the innovation and development of the existing theories, this paper compares the Taiwan model with the Hong Kong and Macao model by means of comparative analysis. On the basis of combing the formation, development and practice of the theory of "one country, two systems", the paper examines the obstacles in the system design and practical application of the theory, and further analyzes the reasons for the above obstacles. The paper puts forward corresponding macro countermeasures. For example, Taiwan's pursuit of "status equality" is satisfied by "special political status" and Taiwan's "sovereign" pursuit is realized through economic means. And the mainland authorized Taiwan to "govern power" in the military field to perfect the theoretical design of "one country, two systems" Taiwan model. In practice, it is necessary to strengthen contacts and exchanges with Taiwan's officials and people, and at the same time to launch active diplomacy in the international arena, so as to promote the motherland's peaceful reunification of real significance at an early date. On the issue of resolving the Taiwan issue, the "one country, two systems" Taiwan model is the best way to realize the common prosperity and development of the two sides of the strait. The paper holds that because of the long separation and estrangement, the unilateral efforts of the mainland are far from enough to realize the peaceful reunification of the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, and Taiwan needs to actively participate in the consultation. The innovation of this paper lies in the analysis of the Taiwan model of "one country, two systems", the study of practical obstacles from the angle of both theoretical design and cross-strait reality, and the use of some characteristics of "federalism" for reference. Give Taiwan a certain "reciprocal status".
【学位授予单位】：西安建筑科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D618
，

本文编号：2006558