村镇宜居社区评价及应用研究
本文选题:村镇社区 + 宜居社区 ; 参考:《北京交通大学》2015年硕士论文
【摘要】:随着城镇化的推进,村镇居民对生活质量的要求不断提高,村镇社区的宜居问题受到广泛关注。但村镇社区还存在着基础设施滞后、经济发展水平较低、文化教育水平落后、医疗保障层次低等问题。另外,国内外学者对宜居研究多聚焦于城市层面,对村镇宜居社区研究还比较空白。由于村镇和城市的区别,村镇宜居社区的评价指标并不能完全参考已有的城市宜居社区指标。 基于这种背景,本文依托国家“十二五”科技支撑项目“村镇宜居社区与小康住宅建设评价体系关键技术研究”(项目编号:2013BAJ10815),对村镇宜居社区进行评价与应用研究,具有重大意义。本文主要采用SPSS统计分析、层次分析和模糊综合评价法对村镇宜居社区进行评价与应用研究,主要内容和结论如下: (1)构建村镇宜居社区评价体系:本文构建了包括居住环境、配套设施、文化氛围和社区服务4个一级指标和18个二级指标在内的村镇宜居社区综合评价体系,并提出应用建议。 (2)提出村镇宜居社区评价体系应用建议:在应用时要明确评价目标、确定评价主体、保障评价过程科学有效性、根据评价结果改进社区建设、用发展的眼光看待宜居社区保证评价体系的科学应用。 (3)利用评价体系进行实证研究:本文根据村镇宜居社区评价体系,对三山家园社区进行评价。邀请专家学者对评价指标权重进行打分,并结合问卷数据,用模糊综合评价法对三山家园社区宜居水平进行综合评价。经分析得到三山家园社区整体宜居水平评价得分为3.43,宜居水平良好。其中配套设施得分最高,3.74分;其次是居住环境,3.42分;再次是文化氛围,3.3分;社区服务得分最低,为2.94分。综合评价结果与社区实际基本吻合,说明评价体系科学性和实用性较强。
[Abstract]:With the development of urbanization, the demands of village residents on the quality of life have been improved, and the problem of liveable living in villages and towns has been paid more and more attention. However, there are still some problems in the village and town community, such as lagged infrastructure, low level of economic development, backward level of culture and education, low level of medical security and so on. In addition, scholars at home and abroad mostly focus on the urban level of livable research, and the study of livable communities in villages and towns is still relatively blank. Because of the difference between towns and villages, the evaluation indexes of livable communities in villages and towns can not refer to the existing indexes of livable communities. Based on this background, this paper, relying on the "12th Five-Year Plan" scientific and technological support project, "Research on the key Technologies of the Evaluation system of Livable Community and Well-off Housing Construction in villages and towns" (Project No.: 2013BAJ10815), evaluates and applies the livable communities of villages and towns. Of great significance. In this paper, SPSS statistical analysis, hierarchical analysis and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method are mainly used to evaluate and apply the village and town livable community. The main contents and conclusions are as follows: (1) constructing the evaluation system of livable community in villages and towns. The comprehensive evaluation system of the livable community in villages and towns, including 4 primary indicators and 18 secondary indicators of cultural atmosphere and community service, And put forward the application suggestion. (2) put forward the application suggestion of the community evaluation system of the village and town suitable for living: make clear the evaluation target, confirm the main body of the evaluation, guarantee the scientific validity of the evaluation process, improve the community construction according to the evaluation result. The scientific application of the evaluation system of livable community assurance is viewed from the perspective of development. (3) an empirical study is carried out by using the evaluation system: according to the evaluation system of livable community in villages and towns, this paper evaluates the community in Sanshan. Experts and scholars are invited to evaluate the weights of the evaluation index, and combined with the questionnaire data, the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method is used to evaluate the livable level of the community in Sanshan. The evaluation score of the whole livable level of Sanshan home community is 3.43, and the livable level is good. The supporting facilities score is the highest (3.74); the second is living environment (3.42); the third is cultural atmosphere (3.3); the lowest is community service (2.94). The comprehensive evaluation results are basically consistent with the community practice, indicating that the evaluation system is scientific and practical.
【学位授予单位】:北京交通大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:D669.3;TU982.29
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 任致远;关于宜居城市的拙见[J];城市发展研究;2005年04期
2 李丽萍;郭宝华;;关于宜居城市的理论探讨[J];城市发展研究;2006年02期
3 郑童;吕斌;张纯;;基于模糊评价法的宜居社区评价研究[J];城市发展研究;2011年09期
4 宁越敏,查志强;大都市人居环境评价和优化研究——以上海市为例[J];城市规划;1999年06期
5 张仁开;长沙城市人居环境现状评价[J];城市问题;2004年02期
6 王茂军,张学霞,栾维新;大连城市居住环境评价构造与空间分析[J];地理科学;2003年01期
7 刘云刚;周雯婷;谭宇文;;日本专业主妇视角下的广州城市宜居性评价[J];地理科学;2010年01期
8 董晓峰;刘星光;刘理臣;;兰州市城市宜居性的参与式评价[J];干旱区地理;2010年01期
9 张沛;张中华;;国外城市居住社区设施可获性研究及其在中国西安的实践[J];国际城市规划;2009年01期
10 谢亚冰;韩松明;林开;;宜居社区园林绿化建设中存在的问题[J];北京农业;2013年12期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 朱毅;城市社区管理理论与实践研究[D];武汉理工大学;2005年
相关硕士学位论文 前7条
1 张淑敏;济南市人居环境质量综合评价及优化对策研究[D];山东师范大学;2005年
2 王琳;宜居城市理论与影响因素研究[D];浙江大学;2007年
3 李丹妮;我国城市宜居社区评估研究[D];大连理工大学;2009年
4 牛士琦;天津市华明镇城镇化进行中社会管理创新与实证研究[D];天津大学;2012年
5 苏曼;洛阳市城市宜居性评价研究[D];河南大学;2013年
6 刘凯;济南宜居度评价与宜居城市建设研究[D];山东师范大学;2014年
7 王茜茜;银川市城市宜居性评价与研究[D];宁夏大学;2014年
,本文编号:2053864
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/guojiguanxi/2053864.html