民主化水平与国家创新能力:对波普尔假说的实证审视

发布时间：2018-06-27 11:25

本文选题：民主化水平 + 国家创新能力　；参考：《国外社会科学》2017年06期

【摘要】：传统观点认为,较高的民主水平往往有利于促进国家创新能力,但民主化本身在短期或长期内能否促进国家创新发展呢?现有文献很少探究民主化水平对国家创新能力的影响,而后者可能是民主制度促进经济发展的重要途径。本文对156个国家在1964—2010年间的创新数据进行实证分析,旨在填补上述研究空白,从而为民主化水平是否能够提升国家创新能力这一经久不息的争论作出贡献。使用双重差分法得到的研究结果表明:若以专利数量、专利引用和专利独创性作为创新能力测度,一国的民主化水平本身对其创新能力并没有直接影响。这一结论证明了制度的多元性和多样化的价值,也为中国国家创新能力在近年来的快速提升提供了有效的理论支撑,支持了当前中国制度对创新能力促进的有效性。
[Abstract]:The traditional view holds that a higher level of democracy is often conducive to the promotion of national innovation, but can democratization promote national innovation in the short or long term? The existing literature rarely explores the influence of democratization on national innovation ability, and the latter may be an important way for democracy to promote economic development. 156 An empirical analysis of the country's innovative data from 1964 to 2010 is designed to fill the gap in the study and contribute to the prolonged debate on whether the level of democratization can enhance the national innovation ability. The results obtained by the dual difference method show that the number of patents, patent quotations and patent ingenuity can be used as a result. A country's level of democratization does not have a direct impact on its innovation ability. This conclusion proves the diversity and diversity of the system, and also provides effective theoretical support for the rapid promotion of Chinese national innovation ability in recent years, and supports the effectiveness of the current Chinese system on the promotion of innovation ability.
【作者单位】：东南大学经济与管理学院;东京大学法学院;北京大学国家治理研究院;北京大学政府管理学院;大连外国语大学高级翻译学院;
【分类号】：D61

【相似文献】