政府购买青少年社区教育服务的困境及对策研究
[Abstract]:The essence of government is to provide public services and meet public needs, but the government does not necessarily directly produce public services, but can also "buy" public services from the private sector and the third sector. Government purchase means that in order to perform the functions of public service, the government, in accordance with the open, fair and just manner and procedure, will hand over part of the public service affairs to the eligible social organization by way of contract. And according to the quantity and quality of the service to pay their fees. Juvenile community education is a kind of educational activities aimed at young people in the community. It aims to serve the growth of young people and the sustainable development of the community. However, the existing youth community education service form is single, it is difficult to meet the diverse learning needs of community residents. The purchase of community education services for teenagers by contract outsourcing and voucher system conforms to the social changes in the period of social transformation, meets the practical requirements of educational governance, and will effectively alleviate the contradiction between supply and demand of community education and promote the construction of a learning society. In Nanjing and Wuxi, the government has made great achievements in purchasing community education service for young people, and Hangzhou's education voucher model has made great progress. However, there are still barriers to participation, institutional barriers and ability barriers among the three major stakeholders of the government, social organizations and the public, which make the government purchase into a dilemma, which is manifested in: the buyer has a long way to go in the transformation of his functions. The participation ability of the undertaking should be improved, the learner's participation consciousness should be strengthened, and the third party's ability to supervise and evaluate is weak. There are not only political factors such as management system, lack of security mechanism, but also economic factors such as shortage of funds, social factors such as cognitive deficiency, cognitive bias, and technical factors such as insufficient effectiveness of performance evaluation and so on. The way out for the government to purchase the community education service for young people lies in the comprehensive reform of the government, social organizations and the public, including changing the concept of the government, perfecting laws and regulations, strengthening the capacity-building of social organizations, and so on.
【学位授予单位】:南京航空航天大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D669.5
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张有亮;贾晟锟;贾军;;政府购买公共服务的法治化问题[J];兰州大学学报(社会科学版);2016年03期
2 夏贵霞;马蕊;王华倬;;政府购买青少年课外体育服务的地方实践与制度创新[J];北京体育大学学报;2016年02期
3 张勇;;引导社会民间组织打造社区教育特色项目的实践与思考[J];江苏科技信息;2015年35期
4 高小泉;程宇;;后单位制时代社区教育的困境及对策研究——基于政府购买公共服务视角的分析[J];云南开放大学学报;2015年03期
5 胡穗;;政府购买社会组织服务绩效评估的实践困境与路径创新[J];湖南师范大学社会科学学报;2015年04期
6 程仙平;;政府购买社区教育服务的理性思考和策略选择[J];河北师范大学学报(教育科学版);2014年06期
7 柏必成;;公众需求:服务型政府的动力来源——兼论服务型政府的本质特征[J];学习论坛;2014年09期
8 冯俏彬;;论政府购买服务与当前财政管理新任务[J];地方财政研究;2014年04期
9 蔺丰奇;李佳航;;论政府购买公共服务的规范化建设——基于社会学制度主义的分析视角[J];经济与管理;2014年02期
10 李保强;马婷婷;;公共教育服务的概念及其体系架构分析[J];教育理论与实践;2014年07期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 李佳萍;我国社区教育管理的问题与对策研究[D];东北师范大学;2014年
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 年四宝;公共服务视角下的城市社区教育之探讨[D];复旦大学;2010年
2 朱海燕;上海浦东新区青少年社区教育工作研究[D];华东师范大学;2009年
3 吴美香;公共服务供给方式研究[D];厦门大学;2008年
,本文编号:2159871
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/guojiguanxi/2159871.html