当前位置:主页 > 社科论文 > 国际关系论文 >

联邦党人国家构建的思想及其实践研究

发布时间:2018-09-17 16:35
【摘要】:独立战争之后的美国,仅仅只靠一个松散的邦联维持着13个州的运转。为克服邦联体制的弊端,1787年13个州的代表商讨制定新宪法,其中赞成批准新宪法和支持联邦主义的人被称为“联邦党人”。长期以来,美国存在着“弱国家”的传统,学术界对于联邦党人的地位和评价都各执一词。因此,引入国家构建理论成为研究美国政治史的新趋势,运用历史和比较的分析方法考察联邦党人国家构建的思想及实践,对于认识国家在现代化中的独特作用有良好的启发性。国家构建作为一个专业的政治学术语,其内涵十分丰富,作为国家构建观念的部分很早就已经产生。联邦党人的国家构建观直接受启蒙时期国家构建观的影响,而韦伯的国家构建观总结了现代国家实现理性化和民主化的过程,马克思主义的国家构建观分析了联邦党人国家构建的局限性。联邦党人在新政府性质、国会权力、行政权力、司法权力等方面与反联邦党人开展了国家构建的辩论,其国家构建思想的核心是构建民族国家,让政府行动强而有力,保持统一稳定的联邦。在联邦党人的国家构建的制度设计及实践中,在一方面实现国家的理性化,它包含了外部关系的理性化、内部结构与组织的理性化、行为方式的理性化、信仰体系的合理性四个层次;在另一方面实现国家体系的民主化,它包含两院制及其代表制、公民权利法案两个具体制度设计。由于各种原因,联邦党人没能在执政时期实现其国家构建的理念。长期与联邦党人斗争的共和党人受“禁运法案”和1812年战争的影响,及时调整执政方针,实现与联邦党人国家构建路线的合流。最后,对联邦党人国家构建的基本动力、基本要件、基本任务、构建时序进行梳理和总结,在国家构建的基本动力中包含了技术革新、市场化和货币化、阶级分化和阶级斗争等四种动力,国家构建的基本要件归纳了核心能动者、初步形成的官僚体制、持续的财政等三个要素,国家构建的基本任务总结了制度建构和合法性建构两个层面,国家构建的时序中梳理了先民族国家、再经济政策、后国家为市场以及社会建构制度等四个次序。从中我们可以看出联邦党人国家构建过程的一般性与特殊性,为深入认识美国国家构建历程和深化国家构建理念提供借鉴。
[Abstract]:After the War of Independence, the United States maintained only a loose confederation of 13 states. To overcome the shortcomings of the confederative system, representatives of 13 states discussed the enactment of a new constitution in 1787, in which those in favor of ratifying the new constitution and supporting federalism were called "federalists." For a long time, the United States had a tradition of "weak states." Therefore, the introduction of the theory of state construction has become a new trend in the study of American political history. It is instructive for us to understand the unique role of the state in modernization to examine the ideas and practices of State Construction of the Federalists by means of historical and comparative analysis. As a professional political terminology, construction has rich connotations and has been produced as part of the concept of nation-building for a long time. The concept of state-building of the Federalists was directly influenced by the concept of state-building in the Enlightenment Period. Weber's concept of state-building summarized the process of rationalization and democratization of the modern state, and Marxist concept of state-building. The Federalists have debated with the anti-Federalists on the nature of the new government, parliamentary power, administrative power, judicial power, etc. The core of their state-building ideas is to build a nation-state so that the government can act strongly and maintain a united and stable federation. In the design and practice of the state-building system of the State Party members, on the one hand, the rationalization of the state is realized, which includes the rationalization of external relations, the rationalization of internal structure and organization, the rationalization of behavior, and the rationality of belief system; on the other hand, the democratization of the state system, which includes the bicameral system and its representatives. Because of various reasons, the Federalists failed to realize the idea of nation-building during their reign. The Republicans who fought against the Federalists for a long time were influenced by the "embargo bill" and the war of 1812. They adjusted their ruling policies in time to realize the convergence of the line of nation-building with the Federalists. The basic motive force, basic elements, basic tasks and construction sequence of the federal party's state construction are sorted out and summarized. The basic motive force of the state construction includes four motive forces: technological innovation, marketization and monetization, class differentiation and class struggle. The basic elements of the State Construction summarize the core activists and the bureaucrats formed initially. The basic task of state construction is to sum up the two levels of system construction and legitimacy construction. The time sequence of state construction includes the following four orders: the first nation-state, the second economic policy, the second nation-market and the second society-building system. The generality and particularity provide reference for us to deeply understand the process of American nation-building and deepen the concept of nation-building.
【学位授予单位】:贵州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D771.2

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 陈智;刘森林;;浅论美国联邦制的形成——联邦党与反联邦党的论战[J];法制与社会;2008年35期

2 蒲慧;叶松竹梅;;读《联邦党人文集》有感——联邦党人对孟德斯鸠思想的继承与发展[J];华商;2007年22期

3 姜峰;;自利及其正当性:立宪设计的前提——以联邦党人的理解为中心[J];文史哲;2009年05期

4 杨明佳;;理性与经验之间:试论联邦党人的政治哲学基础[J];武汉理工大学学报(社会科学版);2009年04期

5 马军;;宪政制衡——简论联邦党人的民主思想[J];法制博览(中旬刊);2013年04期

6 王燕华;;浅析“联邦党人”的分权与制衡理论[J];商业文化(学术版);2008年01期

7 董瑜;;一七九八年《惩治煽动叛乱法》与美国“公共领域”的初步发展[J];历史研究;2011年02期

8 李龙;试论美国1798年《惩治煽动叛乱法案》[J];株洲师范高等专科学校学报;2004年06期

9 徐优;;“良好的开端是成功一半”的“富二代”[J];商品与质量;2010年S7期

10 刘晨光;;美国立国之“自由”原则的政治哲学解析[J];北大法律评论;2010年02期

相关重要报纸文章 前2条

1 谢韬;联邦制的利与弊[N];经济观察报;2013年

2 张明扬 曹柳莺;钱满素谈美国政治中的“尊重反对派”[N];东方早报;2010年

相关硕士学位论文 前3条

1 陈刘杰;联邦党人国家构建的思想及其实践研究[D];贵州大学;2017年

2 李勇;代议制政府[D];对外经济贸易大学;2006年

3 丁天进;宪法之争——美国宪政道路的抉择[D];安徽大学;2010年



本文编号:2246501

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/guojiguanxi/2246501.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户3b313***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com