孟加拉国本地政府官员与官僚在团队合作效率方面的互补关系：多利益相关者视角
发布时间：2024-02-24 12:06
本研究仅关注Upazila Parishad(UZP)团队,该团队被称为孟加拉农村地方政府的中层政府。1982年以前,地方政府被由英国人继承的官僚长期控制;1982年引入UZP系统后,地方政府的权威转向了政治家,但是由于政府的不情愿和官僚之间缺乏合作,UZP系统没有继续下去。在长期缺席之后,UZP现在在492 Upazila的民选领导下运作。根据UZP法案,Upazila Nirbahi官员(UNO)是孟加拉国公务员管理局干部的官员,他被指定为UZP的首席执行官(PE0),而UNO的职责包括确保遵守规则和条例并维持财务纪律。根据1998年UZP法案(2009年和2011年修订),UZP主席(UZPC)拥有监督所有被调动人员的法定权力,移转部门的官员也要对UZPC负责,同时,地方官僚也必须对其上级部门负责。经过大量的实践,UZP系统自2009年以来一直由其选举产生的机构负责管理。但是地方官僚并不准备接受这种权威,因为地方民选政治家试图对地方官僚行使过多的政治权力,最终导致他们之间的冲突。为了缓和两者之间的矛盾,政府也制定了一项规则,即在2015年以党派关系的形式举行地方政府选举,但根据U...
【文章页数】：244 页
【学位级别】：博士
【文章目录】：
摘要
ABSTRACT
Abbreviation
Chapter 1 Introduction and Background of the Study
1.1 Statement of the Issue
1.2 Political Experimentation over Local Government in Bangladesh
1.2.1 Pre-British Era
1.2.2 British Era
1.2.3 Pakistan Era
1.2.4 Bangladesh Era
1.3 Historical Development of Field Administration in Bangladesh
1.3.1 The British Period (1600-1947)
1.3.2 The Pakistan Period (1947-1971)
1.3.3 The Bangladesh Period (1971-2019)
1.4 Local Administration Team of Bangladesh
1.4.1 Politicians
1.4.2 Bureaucrats
1.5 Nature and Scope of the UZP Team Performances
1.6 Scope of the Study
1.7 Objectives and Research Questions of the Study
1.8 Structure of the Dissertation
Chapter 2 Literature Review
2.1 Politics-Bureaucracy Interface
2.1.1 Politics-Administration Dichotomy(1887)
2.1.2 Mutual-Interactive Model of Relationship(1970s)
2.1.3 The Adversarial Model(1987)
2.1.4 Complementarity Model (1998)
2.2 Findings through Previous Literatures
2.3 Significance of the Study
Chapter 3 Theoretical Background and Conceptualization
3.1 Theoretical Framework
3.1.1 Tuckman's Stages of Team Development(1965)
3.1.2 Beckhard's GRPI Model of Team Effectiveness(1972)
3.1.3 Lencioni's Team Dysfunctional Model (2002)
3.2 Conceptualization of the Study Variables
3.2.1 Role Ambiguity
3.2.2 Mutual Dependence
3.2.3 Role Conflict
3.2.4 Mutual Trust
3.2.5 Organizational Commitment
3.2.6 Procedural Justice
3.2.7 Team Effectiveness
3.2.8 Legislation and Policies
3.2.9 Education
Chapter 4 Methodology
4.1 Philosophical Standpoints of the Study
4.1.1 Ontological Perspective
4.1.2 Epistemological Perspective
4.1.3 Explanatory Inference
4.1.4 Deductive Approach
4.1.5 Research Design- Logic of Selecting Triangulation Approach
4.2 Determination of Sample Size
4.2.1 Politicians and Bureaucrats Perspective
4.2.2 Citizen's Perspective
4.3 Data Collection Methods
4.3.1 Structured Questionnaire for Quantitative Field Survey
4.3.2 Semi-structured Questionnaire for Qualitative Interview
4.4 Data Analyzing Methods
4.4.1 Quantitative Data Analyzing through PLS-SEM
4.4.2 Qualitative Data Analyzing through Data Analysis Spiral
4.5 Validity and Reliability
4.5.1 Validity and Reliability for Quantitative Survey
4.5.2 Validity and Reliability for Qualitative Survey
Chapter 5 Politico-Bureaucratic Relationships towards TeamEffectiveness: Politicians and Bureaucrats Perspectives
5.1 Demographic Features of the Sample Respondents
5.2 Results of Quantitative Data Analysis
5.3 Measurement Model
5.3.1 Convergent Validity
5.3.2 Indicator Reliability
5.3.3 Discriminant Validity
5.4 Structural Model
5.4.1 Multicollinearity Assessment of Structural Model
5.4.2 Path Co-efficient and T-statistics Value
5.4.3 Measuring the Value of R2
5.4.4 Effect Size f
5.4.5 Model's Predictive Relevance (Q2)
5.4.6 Assessment of Fit
5.5 Moderating Effects
5.5.1 Path Co-efficient Results with Total Effects
5.5.2 Measuring the Value of R2 and Effect Size f2 with Moderating Effects
5.5.3 Model's Predictive Relevance (Q2) with Moderating Effects
5.5.4 Model Fit with Moderating Effects
5.5.5 Simple Slope Plot Analysis
Chapter 6 Politico-Bureaucratic Relationships towards TeamEffectiveness: Citizen's Perspectives
6.1 Demographic Features of the Respondents
6.2 Results of Qualitative Data Analysis
6.2.1 Relationships between Politicians and Bureaucrats
6.2.2 Factors Associated with Conflicts between Politicians and Bureaucrats
6.2.3 Role of MP over the UZP under UZP Amendment Act 2009&2011
6.2.4 Issues that Associated with Conflicts between MP and UZPC
6.2.5 Role of Less-Educated Team Members on UZP Performances
6.2.6 Role of Partisan Elected Politicians at the UZP
6.2.7 Partisan Elected Leader's Role in Team Effectiveness
6.2.8 More Conflicting Pairs of Relationships at the UZP
6.2.9 Citizen's Recommendations towards Team Effectiveness at the UZP
Chapter 7 Discussion and Conclusion
7.1 Introduction
7.2 Summary of the Findings
7.2.1 Politicians and Bureaucrats Perspectives
7.2.2 Citizen's Perspective
7.3 Theoretical Contributions
7.4 Practical Contributions
7.4.1 Role Ambiguity and Team Effectiveness
7.4.2 Mutual Dependence and Team Effectiveness
7.4.3 Role Conflict and Team Effectiveness
7.4.4 Mutual Trust and Team Effectiveness
7.4.5 Organizational Commitment and Team Effectiveness
7.4.6 Procedural Justice and Team effectiveness
7.4.7 Role of Legislation and Policies as Moderator
7.4.8 Role of Education as Moderator
7.5 Limitations and Future Research
7.6 Conclusions and Policy Recommendations
References
Appendix
Appendix 1: Survey Questionnaire for the politicians & the bureaucrats
Appendix 2: Interview Questionnaire for the Citizen
Appendix 3: Functions of Upazila Parishad
Appendix 4: Revenue Sources of Upazila Parishad
Appendix 5: Name of the standing committee of Upazila Parishad
Appendix 6: Functions of Upazila Nirbahi Officer (UNO)
Appendix 7: Criterion for block grant allocation in sector wise
Acknowledgement
Academic Articles and Research Outcomes in Study Period
本文编号：3908967
【文章页数】：244 页
【学位级别】：博士
【文章目录】：
摘要
ABSTRACT
Abbreviation
Chapter 1 Introduction and Background of the Study
1.1 Statement of the Issue
1.2 Political Experimentation over Local Government in Bangladesh
1.2.1 Pre-British Era
1.2.2 British Era
1.2.3 Pakistan Era
1.2.4 Bangladesh Era
1.3 Historical Development of Field Administration in Bangladesh
1.3.1 The British Period (1600-1947)
1.3.2 The Pakistan Period (1947-1971)
1.3.3 The Bangladesh Period (1971-2019)
1.4 Local Administration Team of Bangladesh
1.4.1 Politicians
1.4.2 Bureaucrats
1.5 Nature and Scope of the UZP Team Performances
1.6 Scope of the Study
1.7 Objectives and Research Questions of the Study
1.8 Structure of the Dissertation
Chapter 2 Literature Review
2.1 Politics-Bureaucracy Interface
2.1.1 Politics-Administration Dichotomy(1887)
2.1.2 Mutual-Interactive Model of Relationship(1970s)
2.1.3 The Adversarial Model(1987)
2.1.4 Complementarity Model (1998)
2.2 Findings through Previous Literatures
2.3 Significance of the Study
Chapter 3 Theoretical Background and Conceptualization
3.1 Theoretical Framework
3.1.1 Tuckman's Stages of Team Development(1965)
3.1.2 Beckhard's GRPI Model of Team Effectiveness(1972)
3.1.3 Lencioni's Team Dysfunctional Model (2002)
3.2 Conceptualization of the Study Variables
3.2.1 Role Ambiguity
3.2.2 Mutual Dependence
3.2.3 Role Conflict
3.2.4 Mutual Trust
3.2.5 Organizational Commitment
3.2.6 Procedural Justice
3.2.7 Team Effectiveness
3.2.8 Legislation and Policies
3.2.9 Education
Chapter 4 Methodology
4.1 Philosophical Standpoints of the Study
4.1.1 Ontological Perspective
4.1.2 Epistemological Perspective
4.1.3 Explanatory Inference
4.1.4 Deductive Approach
4.1.5 Research Design- Logic of Selecting Triangulation Approach
4.2 Determination of Sample Size
4.2.1 Politicians and Bureaucrats Perspective
4.2.2 Citizen's Perspective
4.3 Data Collection Methods
4.3.1 Structured Questionnaire for Quantitative Field Survey
4.3.2 Semi-structured Questionnaire for Qualitative Interview
4.4 Data Analyzing Methods
4.4.1 Quantitative Data Analyzing through PLS-SEM
4.4.2 Qualitative Data Analyzing through Data Analysis Spiral
4.5 Validity and Reliability
4.5.1 Validity and Reliability for Quantitative Survey
4.5.2 Validity and Reliability for Qualitative Survey
Chapter 5 Politico-Bureaucratic Relationships towards TeamEffectiveness: Politicians and Bureaucrats Perspectives
5.1 Demographic Features of the Sample Respondents
5.2 Results of Quantitative Data Analysis
5.3 Measurement Model
5.3.1 Convergent Validity
5.3.2 Indicator Reliability
5.3.3 Discriminant Validity
5.4 Structural Model
5.4.1 Multicollinearity Assessment of Structural Model
5.4.2 Path Co-efficient and T-statistics Value
5.4.3 Measuring the Value of R2
5.4.5 Model's Predictive Relevance (Q2)
5.4.6 Assessment of Fit
5.5 Moderating Effects
5.5.1 Path Co-efficient Results with Total Effects
5.5.2 Measuring the Value of R2 and Effect Size f2 with Moderating Effects
5.5.3 Model's Predictive Relevance (Q2) with Moderating Effects
5.5.4 Model Fit with Moderating Effects
5.5.5 Simple Slope Plot Analysis
Chapter 6 Politico-Bureaucratic Relationships towards TeamEffectiveness: Citizen's Perspectives
6.1 Demographic Features of the Respondents
6.2 Results of Qualitative Data Analysis
6.2.1 Relationships between Politicians and Bureaucrats
6.2.2 Factors Associated with Conflicts between Politicians and Bureaucrats
6.2.3 Role of MP over the UZP under UZP Amendment Act 2009&2011
6.2.4 Issues that Associated with Conflicts between MP and UZPC
6.2.5 Role of Less-Educated Team Members on UZP Performances
6.2.6 Role of Partisan Elected Politicians at the UZP
6.2.7 Partisan Elected Leader's Role in Team Effectiveness
6.2.8 More Conflicting Pairs of Relationships at the UZP
6.2.9 Citizen's Recommendations towards Team Effectiveness at the UZP
Chapter 7 Discussion and Conclusion
7.1 Introduction
7.2 Summary of the Findings
7.2.1 Politicians and Bureaucrats Perspectives
7.2.2 Citizen's Perspective
7.3 Theoretical Contributions
7.4 Practical Contributions
7.4.1 Role Ambiguity and Team Effectiveness
7.4.2 Mutual Dependence and Team Effectiveness
7.4.3 Role Conflict and Team Effectiveness
7.4.4 Mutual Trust and Team Effectiveness
7.4.5 Organizational Commitment and Team Effectiveness
7.4.6 Procedural Justice and Team effectiveness
7.4.7 Role of Legislation and Policies as Moderator
7.4.8 Role of Education as Moderator
7.5 Limitations and Future Research
7.6 Conclusions and Policy Recommendations
References
Appendix
Appendix 1: Survey Questionnaire for the politicians & the bureaucrats
Appendix 2: Interview Questionnaire for the Citizen
Appendix 3: Functions of Upazila Parishad
Appendix 4: Revenue Sources of Upazila Parishad
Appendix 5: Name of the standing committee of Upazila Parishad
Appendix 6: Functions of Upazila Nirbahi Officer (UNO)
Appendix 7: Criterion for block grant allocation in sector wise
Acknowledgement
Academic Articles and Research Outcomes in Study Period
本文编号：3908967
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/guojizhengzhilunwen/3908967.html
