应国具铭铜器研究
发布时间：2018-06-16 12:55
本文选题：应国 + 具铭铜器 ； 参考：《中央民族大学》2010年硕士论文
【摘要】： 本文在对应国具铭铜器资料进行全面搜集和对相关铜器进行辨伪考证的基础上,通过对具铭铜器的年代学研究,建立应国具铭铜器的年代学体系,构建应世家世系。全文分为五部分： 绪论主要介绍选题背景、研究现状及本文的研究范围与目标。 第一章对应国具铭铜器资料进行整理研究,重点考订应国具铭铜器的来源、数量、款识及辨伪,力求对应国具铭铜器的现状有一个全面的掌握。应国具铭铜器有三个来源：1、应国墓地和其他地区考古出土,51件；2、传世品,20件；3、近年收藏机构购藏的流散品,13件,共计84件。 第二章对应国铜器中的4件伪品,即应公剑、十六字应公鼎以及首阳斋收藏的应侯簋和上海博物馆收藏的应侯视工鼎进行辨伪。 第三章对应国具铭铜器进行断代研究。主要利用考古类型学方法,通过形制、纹饰、字体诸因素的综合分析,判定具铭铜器的年代关系,得出以下重要结论： 1、属应国国君器的传世具铭铜中,应公尊A属成王时期,器主当即应国的始封君应公Ⅰ；应公簋A、应公簋B、应公卣A、应公卣B、应公鼎A、应公鼎B以及十六字应公鼎等属昭王时期,其器主应公Ⅱ,但不能确定其与应公工的关系；应公方鼎、应公觯属穆王时期,其器主为应公Ⅲ乃应国墓地M84应侯再之父。应公Ⅲ谥号懶公。 2、目前所见应国墓地出土应国国君器属于西周中期至东周初年,其中M84墓主应侯再主体年代在穆王晚年至懿孝时期；M104、M105墓主艺虎可能为一代应侯,主体年代在西周中期偏晚,其与应侯再的关系不能确定；应侯视工器绝大部分流散,应侯视工的主体年代在厉王早期,上限或可至夷王时期；M95墓主应侯敌主体年代在厉王晚年至宣王初年；M13墓主应侯叔诰父主体年代在宣王时期；M8墓主应公Ⅳ主体年代在宣王末期至春秋早期。 3、非应国国君器的具铭铜器中,江西出土的应监u属成王时期,当应公工时期；柞伯簋属昭王时期,当应公Ⅱ时期；应国墓地M51、M50匍v伞229属穆王时期,当懶公时期。 4、对应国具铭铜器形制、纹饰、铭文特点进行了归纳,认为西周早期偏晚昭王时期至西周晚期,是应国形成独特青铜文化的时期。 结语对全文主要内容进行了总结。
[Abstract]:On the basis of collecting the materials of the corresponding country's inscription bronze ware and discriminating the relevant bronze ware, this paper establishes the chronological system of the bronze ware of the Ming inscription by studying the chronology of the bronze ware, and constructs the family of the bronze ware of the corresponding country. The full text is divided into five parts: introduction mainly introduces the background, research status and research scope and objectives of this paper. In the first chapter, the author makes a study on the materials of the corresponding country's bronze inscriptions, focusing on the sources, quantities, funds and forgeries of the corresponding country's inscriptions, in order to have a comprehensive grasp of the current situation of the corresponding country's bronze inscriptions. There are three sources of bronze wares in Yingguo inscription: 1, 51 pieces unearthed in cemeteries and other regions, 20 pieces handed down, and 13 pieces of scattered articles collected by collectors in recent years, a total of 84 pieces. The second chapter deals with four counterfeit pieces of bronze wares in China, namely, Ying Gong Jian, 16 characters Ying Gongding, Yinghou Gui collected by Shouyang Zhai and Hou Gui collected by Shanghai Museum. In the third chapter, the author studies the age of the bronze ware of Guozhouming. By using the archaeological typology method, through the comprehensive analysis of various factors, such as shape, decoration and font, the chronological relationship of bronze inscriptions has been determined, and the following important conclusions have been drawn: 1. Ying Gong Jun A belongs to the period of becoming king, and the master of the vessel immediately should be the beginning of the country and the king should be the king; the master of the vessel shall be the king of the period of Zhao Wang, such as Yinggong Gui, Ying Gong Gui, Ying Gong you, Ying Gong Ding A, Ying Gong Ding B, and sixteen characters shall be the same as the king. However, it is not certain that the relationship between Ying Gong Ding and Ying Gong Ji belongs to the period of Muwang, and its owner is Ying Gong 鈪，
本文编号：2026773
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/kgx/2026773.html
