逻辑哲学中的实在论立
发布时间：2018-07-14 07:20
【摘要】：普特南的不可取缔性论证的主旨在于:在逻辑哲学和数学哲学中,对集合之类的抽象实体实行量化是不可取缔的,唯名论者认为诸如类和数实际上并不存在的思想是不正确的。为了替自己的论证辩护,普特南与各式各样的反对者进行了论战。对于这一论证的有效反驳似乎至今还没有出现,对于这一论证的反驳会一直持续下去,这或许正是普特南不可取缔性论证的魅力所在。
[Abstract]:The purport of Putnam's argumentation of irrevocability is that in the philosophy of logic and mathematics, it is impossible to quantify the abstract entities such as sets, while nominalists believe that the idea that classes and numbers do not actually exist is incorrect. In defence of his argument, Putnam argued with a wide variety of opponents. The valid rebuttal of this argument seems to have not yet appeared, and the rebuttal of this argument will continue, which may be the charm of Putnam's irrevocable argument.
【作者单位】： 西南财经大学马克思主义学院;中山大学逻辑与认知研究所;南开大学哲学系;
【分类号】：B812
本文编号：2120901
[Abstract]:The purport of Putnam's argumentation of irrevocability is that in the philosophy of logic and mathematics, it is impossible to quantify the abstract entities such as sets, while nominalists believe that the idea that classes and numbers do not actually exist is incorrect. In defence of his argument, Putnam argued with a wide variety of opponents. The valid rebuttal of this argument seems to have not yet appeared, and the rebuttal of this argument will continue, which may be the charm of Putnam's irrevocable argument.
【作者单位】： 西南财经大学马克思主义学院;中山大学逻辑与认知研究所;南开大学哲学系;
【分类号】：B812
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 吴玉平;任晓明;;逻辑哲学中的实在论立场——普特南的不可取缔性论证探究[J];江西社会科学;2009年05期
，本文编号：2120901
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/ljx/2120901.html
