幽默语言的逻辑与语用分析

发布时间：2022-10-20 19:59

　　本文以幽默话语中发话人和受话人的互动关系为出发点,从语言的逻辑性和语用角度分析幽默语言的制笑机理,侧重分析言语事件中由于视角不同,造成逻辑错位及特定环境下语用联系的缺失而产生的幽默。 第一章是对论文的概述,交待写作目的、语料来源、研究方法和论文的结构布局。 第二章是文献回顾,探讨了脚本论,不协调论等幽默理论,及语言交际中的会话原则本文特辑关注的是从认知角度出发的不协调论,而脚本论则是不协调幽默理论在语言学领域的载体。不协调理论最早由斯派格尔提出后得到众多学者推崇。虽然他们对于脚本有不同的定义,但都认为脚本对立产生不协调是幽默的本质原因,还认为单有不协调并不足以构成幽默,必须加上对不协调的释放和顿悟才会构成幽默。脚本论由拉斯金提出,脚本指词汇所描述的场景和行为。这一学说认为当文本满足两个条件时才能构成幽默:第一,文本中有两个完全或部分不同的脚本,第二,两个脚本在此文本中完全或部分对立。阿塔多和拉斯金后来共同扩展了这一学说,在脚本对立的基础上,提出了幽默中语言、叙述策略、取笑对象、情境、逻辑机制等六大因素。对幽默研究文献的回顾,构成了本文案例分析的基础。... 

【文章页数】：59 页

【学位级别】：硕士

【文章目录】：
Chapter One Introduction
Chapter Two Literature Review
    2.1 Close Relationship between Logic and Pragmatics
        2.1.1 Logic, Language, and Humor
        2.1.2 Logic, Meaning, and Humor
        2.1.3 Logic, Pragmatics, and Humor
    2.2 Other Theories of Humor
        2.2.1 The SSTH Theory of Humor
            2.2.1.1 Scripts
            2.2.1.2 Overlapping
            2.2.1.3 Oppositeness
        2.2.2 The GTVH Theory of Humor
        2.2.3 The Incongruity Theory
        2.2.4 Arthur Koestler’s Theory on Humor
Chapter Three Logical and Pragmatic Analysis on Humor
    3.1 Humor from Logical Deviation
        3.1.1 Violation of the Law of Identity
            3.1.1.1 Concepts Confusion
            3.1.1.2 Concepts Substitution
            3.1.1.3 Topics Substitution
            3.1.1.4 Topics Divergence
        3.1.2 Violation of the Law of Non-contradiction
        3.1.3 Violation of the Law of Middle Excluded
        3.1.4 Violation of the Law of Ample Reasons
        3.1.5 Likelihood
        3.1.6 Unexpected Results from Inferencing
    3.2 Humor from Pragmatic Considerations
        3.2.1 Shared Knowledge and Humor
        3.2.2 Converstional Implicature and Humor
Chapter Four Conclusion
    4.1 General Summary
    4.2 Possible Theoretical and Practical Significance
    4.3 Limitations and Further Suggestions for Further Study
References



本文编号：3695208