效率与公平视角下贫困线优化的哲学支点决断

发布时间：2018-03-07 03:28

本文选题：贫困线　切入点：哲学支点　出处：《社会科学》2017年08期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：反贫困是政府以公平为导向的最大政策选项,制定贫困线是所有反贫困的基础工作,从而贫困线的确定关乎公平与效率的抉择。效率取向的市场可以为反贫困乃至社会公平提供坚实的物质基础,即反贫困需要市场经济,但不能依靠市场。贫困线的选择生动地反映了效率与公平的抉择过程:如果将贫困线定得太低,会使贫困人口失去发展乃至生存的机会,有失公平;如果贫困线定得过高,政府的扶贫投入过多,会使国家背上扶贫和社会保障的沉重包袱,最终损失了效率。通过理论和实践两个层面的深刻分析,得出结论:最佳的选择是"效率与公平兼顾",其关键点在于我们到底愿意以多少效率为代价去换取更多的公平。
[Abstract]:Anti-poverty is the government's biggest policy option oriented towards equity, and setting the poverty line is the foundation for all anti-poverty. Therefore, the determination of poverty line is related to the choice between fairness and efficiency. The market of efficiency orientation can provide a solid material foundation for anti-poverty and even social equity, that is, anti-poverty needs market economy. But cannot rely on the market. The choice of the poverty line vividly reflects the process of choosing between efficiency and equity: if the poverty line is set too low, it will deprive the poor of their chances of development and even survival, and if the poverty line is set too high, If the government invests too much in poverty alleviation, it will make the country carry a heavy burden of poverty alleviation and social security, and ultimately lose its efficiency. Through theoretical and practical profound analysis, The conclusion is that the best choice is "efficiency and fairness", the key point is how much efficiency we are willing to pay for more fairness.
【作者单位】：云南财经大学;
【基金】：国家社科基金项目“中国特色的农村反贫困度量的理论与实践研究”(项目编号:10XJY029) 云南财经大学引进人才资助项目“反贫困度量的多元视角统计学特征研究”(批准号2016D21) 云南省2017年学习型党组织建设课题研究的阶段性成果
【分类号】：F126

【相似文献】