山东省县域城镇化水平及空间差异研究
发布时间:2018-04-09 13:34
本文选题:县域城镇化 切入点:聚类分析 出处:《山东师范大学》2016年硕士论文
【摘要】:城镇化是衡量一个国家或地区经济发展和社会进步的重要标志,也是社会发展的必然趋势。中国已经进入城镇化发展的重要阶段,走中国特色社会主义新型城镇化道路,已经成为各方共识。2014年《国家新型城镇化规划》中指出加快发展中小城市是优化城镇规模结构的主攻方向。中小城市是城市与乡村联系的重要环节,是城乡统筹发展的战略支点,是展示城市文明、防范现代城市病、建设和谐城市的最佳实践区,是新型城镇化的主要战场。县域作为中小城市的主要组成部分,城镇化发展对转移农村剩余劳动力、实现城乡统筹发展意义重大。山东省是我国较发达的省份之一,县域城镇化研究格外重要。论文依据人文-经济地理学的相关理论与研究方法,以山东省的县域单元为研究对象,运用定性与定量分析和理论与实证分析相结合的方法,在科学性、综合性等原则的指导下,从人口城镇化、经济城镇化、社会城镇化和城市建设方面选取了16个城镇化指标,根据熵值法对山东省2005年和2013年县域城镇化水平进行测度,将山东省县域分为四个层次,城镇化高水平类型、城镇化较高水平类型、城镇化中水平类型和城镇化低水平类型;通过耦合协调模型对2005年和2013年山东省县域城镇化水平进行计算,结果表明山东省没有达到极度协调耦合类型的县域,少数县域属于高度协调耦合类型和低度耦合协调类型,大部分县域属于中度耦合协调类型。对县域城镇化水平进行空间差异分析,山东省县域城镇化空间差异的特征主要包括:山东省县域城镇化水平呈现级差化分异特征,城镇化水平差异较大;沿海县域城镇化水平高于内陆县域;铁路沿线县域的城镇化水平高于周边非铁路沿线的县域。对山东省东中西部县域城镇化水平差异进行分析,2013年山东省三大区域县域城镇化水平由东向西呈阶梯状分布,东部最高,中部次之,西部最低。根据空间自相关分析得知,山东省县域城镇化水平具有显著的空间自相关性。并从自然条件和资源禀赋、地理位置和交通条件、经济因素和政府政策等角度分析了影响城镇化空间差异的因素。最后针对山东省县域城镇化发展存在的问题,提出促进山东省县域城镇化发展的对策建议:深化城镇化体制改革;大力发展县域经济,调整产业结构;完善社会保障体系;积极整合协调区域发展。
[Abstract]:Urbanization is an important symbol to measure the economic development and social progress of a country or region, as well as an inevitable trend of social development.China has entered an important stage in the development of urbanization. It has taken the new road of urbanization of socialism with Chinese characteristics.In 2014, the National New urbanization Plan points out that speeding up the development of small and medium-sized cities is the main direction to optimize the scale structure of cities and towns.Small and medium-sized cities are the important link between cities and villages, the strategic fulcrum for the overall development of urban and rural areas, the best practice areas for displaying urban civilization, preventing modern urban diseases, and building harmonious cities, and are the main battlefields for new-type urbanization.As the main component of small and medium-sized cities, the development of urbanization is of great significance to transfer rural surplus labor force and realize the overall development of urban and rural areas.Shandong Province is one of the more developed provinces in China.Based on the relevant theories and research methods of humanistic and economic geography, this paper takes the county unit of Shandong Province as the research object, and applies the method of combining qualitative and quantitative analysis and theoretical and empirical analysis, which is scientific.Under the guidance of comprehensive principles, 16 urbanization indexes are selected from the aspects of population urbanization, economic urbanization, social urbanization and urban construction, and the county urbanization level of Shandong Province in 2005 and 2013 is measured according to entropy method.The county area of Shandong Province is divided into four levels: high level type of urbanization, high level type of urbanization, level type of urbanization and low level type of urbanization;The county urbanization level in Shandong Province in 2005 and 2013 is calculated by coupling coordination model. The results show that the county area of Shandong Province has not reached the extreme coordination coupling type, and a few counties belong to the highly coordinated coupling type and the low-degree coupling coordination type.Most counties belong to the type of moderate coupling and coordination.The spatial differences of the county urbanization level are analyzed. The main characteristics of the county urbanization in Shandong Province are as follows: the county urbanization level in Shandong Province presents the characteristics of differential differentiation, and the urbanization level is quite different;The urbanization level of coastal counties is higher than that of inland counties, and the urbanization level of counties along railway lines is higher than that of surrounding counties along non-railway lines.This paper analyzes the difference of county urbanization level in east, middle and west regions of Shandong province. In 2013, the urbanization level of three regions in Shandong Province was ladder-like from east to west, with the highest in the east, the second in the middle and the lowest in the west.According to spatial autocorrelation analysis, the county urbanization level in Shandong Province has significant spatial autocorrelation.The factors influencing the spatial difference of urbanization are analyzed from the aspects of natural conditions and resource endowment, geographical location and traffic conditions, economic factors and government policies.Finally, in view of the problems existing in the development of county urbanization in Shandong Province, the countermeasures and suggestions for promoting the development of county urbanization in Shandong Province are put forward: deepening the reform of urbanization system, vigorously developing county economy, adjusting industrial structure, perfecting social security system;Actively integrate and coordinate regional development.
【学位授予单位】:山东师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:F299.27
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 杨传开;张凡;宁越敏;;山东省城镇化发展态势及其新型城镇化路径[J];经济地理;2015年06期
2 冯兴华;钟业喜;李建新;黄洁;;长江中游城市群县域城镇化水平空间格局演变及驱动因子分析[J];长江流域资源与环境;2015年06期
3 李秋颖;方创琳;王少剑;王洋;;山东省人口城镇化与空间城镇化协调发展及空间格局[J];地域研究与开发;2015年01期
4 赵明华;包维虎;韩荣青;;近10年来山东省城镇化水平时空差异分析[J];世界地理研究;2014年04期
5 王新越;宋樝;宋斐红;于世远;;山东省新型城镇化的测度与空间分异研究[J];地理科学;2014年09期
6 张鹏;于伟;;山东省城镇化效率及空间结构研究[J];地理与地理信息科学;2014年04期
7 杨勃;石培基;;甘肃省县域城镇化地域差异及形成机理[J];干旱区地理;2014年04期
8 陈忠暖;高权;王帅;;中国省际城镇化综合水平及其空间分异[J];经济地理;2014年06期
9 夏后学;陈方;支玲;李娅;;基于超效率DEA方法的江苏省城镇化发展差异评价[J];中国农业资源与区划;2014年02期
10 姚士谋;张平宇;余成;李广宇;王成新;;中国新型城镇化理论与实践问题[J];地理科学;2014年06期
,本文编号:1726647
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/shehuibaozhanglunwen/1726647.html