论以危险方法危害公共安全罪的限制

发布时间：2018-05-25 21:14

本文选题：以危险方法危害公共安全罪 + 危险方法　；参考：《华中科技大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：以危险方法危害公共安全罪在对社会风险事件给予重击的同时,罪刑法定原则的明确性也因刑事政策的宽泛解读、司法受制于社会舆论而遭受冲击。公共的本质在于社会性,而社会性是个体性抽象化、一般化的集合,多数只是公共的外在表现形式,只是从数量上对公共的直观描述。“不特定多数”的限定关系最准确概括了“公共”的本质,即个体利益的抽象化的集合。司法适用中对本罪“其他”的理解过于随意,容易导致司法适用的不统一,引发理解上的混乱,同时破坏罪刑法定原则的确定性。刑法的谦抑性和罪刑法定原则要求对本罪进行必要限制。对于“其他”的认定应当是对独立于刑法第114条中明确列举的行为之外的同等类型性的行为进行兜底,不能作为刑法分则第二章危害公共安全罪中的具体罪名的兜底,也不能理解为整个刑法分则的兜底。同时,“其他”的内涵随着立法的进步而不断限缩,这也是罪刑法定原则明确性的要求。要解决危险方法立法上的空白描述的不足,既要揭示危险方法的定性要素与定量要素统一,又应当认清危险方法的内在属性和外在特征。改变本罪立法上的模糊,实现抽象立法的具体化是关键。司法实践应当重视司法案例的指导作用,必须建立一套完整的司法案例指导机制,才能充分发挥以危险方法危害公共安全罪在应对必要不得已的社会风险方面社会保障功效。
[Abstract]:At the same time, the crime of endangering public security by dangerous methods gives a heavy blow to social risk events. The clarity of the principle of legality is also influenced by the broad interpretation of criminal policy and the impact of the judicial system on social public opinion. The nature of the public is sociality, and the sociality is individualized, a general collection, and most of the public outside. In the form of expression, it is only a visual description of the public from quantity. The definition of "no specific majority" is the most accurate summary of the essence of "public", that is, the abstract collection of individual interests. In judicial application, the understanding of the "other" of the crime is too arbitrary, which easily leads to the disunity of judicial application and causes confusion in understanding. The certainty of the principle of sabotaging the legality of crime and punishment. The modesty of the criminal law and the principle of legality require the necessary restrictions on the crime. The affirmation of the "other" should be the bottom of the same type of behavior, which is independent of the explicit act listed in the 114th article of the criminal law, and can not be used as the second chapter of the criminal law for the crime of endangering public security. The bottom of the specific crime can not be understood as the bottom of the whole criminal law. At the same time, the connotation of the "other" is limited by the progress of the legislation, which is also the requirement of the clear principle of the principle of legal punishment. To solve the deficiency of the blank description in the legislation of the dangerous method, we should not only reveal the qualitative elements and the quantitative elements of the dangerous methods. First, we should recognize the inherent and external characteristics of the dangerous methods. It is the key to change the ambiguity in the legislation of the crime and realize the concretion of the abstract legislation. The judicial practice should attach importance to the guiding role of the judicial cases, and must establish a complete set of judicial case guidance mechanism to give full play to the crime of endangering public safety by dangerous methods. The social security effect of the necessary social risks.
【学位授予单位】：华中科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D924.3

【相似文献】