我国民事法律援助制度研究
[Abstract]:The legal aid system was established in Britain at the end of the 20th century. It emphasizes that the State, proceeding from the responsibility of the Government, in order to safeguard judicial justice, guarantee equality before the law, promote social stability and harmonious development, and provide free legal services to the parties in financial difficulties, To assist in the exercise of litigation and other rights. China's legal aid system includes criminal, civil and administrative legal aid. Compared with criminal and administrative legal aid, civil legal aid system protects citizens' basic human rights on an equal footing and fully protects the legitimate rights and interests of vulnerable groups. Realizing the judicial concept of "approaching justice", perfecting the implementation mechanism of equal procedural rights, perfecting the social legal system and social security system, promoting the social stability and harmonious development, and so on, all play a practical role and have far-reaching significance. With the rapid development of the market economy, the acceleration of urbanization and the prominent gap between the rich and the poor, the difficulty of protecting the rights of the disadvantaged groups in society needs to be solved. Under the background of ruling the country according to law, the civil trial procedure in our country is changing actively from the doctrine of authority to the mode of litigant doctrine, which has higher requirements for the legal knowledge and specialized litigation skills of the parties involved in the litigation. For the poor and disadvantaged groups with poor economic conditions, they are not familiar with legal knowledge, nor do they master litigation skills. The protection of the civil litigation rights of this group needs professional legal services, and they face the obstacles caused by the compensability of lawyers' services. The perfection and perfection of civil legal aid system is especially important. However, in the more than 20 years since the establishment of the system, the development of the civil legal aid system in China has lagged behind the rapid development of the economic level. The reason is that the relevant legislation is not perfect, the specific implementation measures are not perfect, the lack of funds, the lack of human resources, and so on. As a "sunshine project", we should pay attention to how to let the system out of the bottleneck period of development. However, compared with the deep research on the development of the more mature criminal legal aid system in the field of legal theory, the current research on the civil legal aid system appears to be superficial and lagged behind. Based on this situation, this paper starts with the connotation of civil legal aid in our country. Starting with the basic theory of the civil legal aid system and the actual operation condition of the civil legal aid system, such as the subject of the civil legal aid system, five aspects such as the operation status, the extant problems, the extraterritorial experience and the rationalization suggestion are taken as the starting point and the basic theory of the civil legal aid system as the starting point. Scope, procedure, capital, quality supervision and so on as the research object, through the analysis and summary of the problems arising from the above aspects in the practice of this system in our country, at the same time, it is compared with the relevant systems of the overseas developed countries and experiences are used for reference. Finally, from the two aspects of legislation and specific implementation of the system of civil legal aid in China to put forward relevant suggestions to improve, That is, on the one hand, from the macroscopic legislative point of view, it proposes to raise the legislative level and establish a relevant supporting legal aid legal system at the grass-roots level. On the other hand, from the point of view of perfecting the micro specific system, this paper puts forward how to expand the participation of diverse civil assistance, expand the scope of civil assistance, expand the channels of funds guarantee, and establish the case quality supervision mechanism. To establish the coordination mechanism of civil legal aid with the courts and procuratorates, and to explore the concrete suggestions for the modernization of governance. With a view to the development of civil legal aid system to get more and more extensive attention.
【学位授予单位】:大连海事大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D926.5
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 左秀美;;中国法律援助制度趋向成熟[J];中国法律;2000年03期
2 魏虹;论我国法律援助制度[J];理论导刊;2000年10期
3 魏赛娟;浅谈深港法律援助制度[J];特区理论与实践;2000年02期
4 张铁柱;建立与完善我国法律援助制度的思考[J];承德民族职业技术学院学报;2000年02期
5 王昀,许刚,刘唯翔,陈斐轶;对上海市现行法律援助制度的思考[J];华东政法学院学报;2000年02期
6 葛卫民;完善我国法律援助制度的思考[J];武汉科技大学学报(社会科学版);2000年04期
7 魏琼;刑事法律援助制度的国际标准与中国实践[J];云南法学;2000年02期
8 黄红华;建立我国法律援助制度刍议[J];厦门特区党校学报;2000年02期
9 杨占栋;中国法律援助制度的建立及其发展的制约因素[J];滨州师专学报;2001年03期
10 张慧清;谈法律援助制度中存在的几个问题及对策[J];呼伦贝尔学院学报;2001年02期
相关会议论文 前6条
1 沈丽飞;;欧美法律援助制度研究——兼论“入世”对我国法律援助制度建设的影响[A];加入WTO与新时期政法工作前瞻——加入世贸组织与维护社会稳定法律问题研讨会论文集[C];2000年
2 张雪梅;;对未成年人法律援助制度的思考与建议[A];规划·规范·规则——第六届中国律师论坛优秀论文集[C];2006年
3 王永杰;;福利三角结构视野下的中国的法律援助制度[A];2008年度上海市社会科学界第六届学术年会文集(政治·法律·社会学科卷)[C];2008年
4 张晓力;;着力保障民生 大力推进法律援助制度建设[A];中国犯罪学学会第十七届学术研讨会论文集[C];2008年
5 严亮奇;;如何构建社会主义新农村法律援助制度[A];2009中华全国律师协会经济专业委员会年会论文集[C];2009年
6 张燕;;和谐社会建设中的司法制度——如何实现公正与和谐的刑事法律援助制度[A];中国犯罪学研究会第十五届学术研讨会论文集(第一辑)[C];2006年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 李娟 姚飞(作者单位:石家庄职业技术学院、河北大学);完善我国的法律援助制度[N];河北经济日报;2005年
2 北京大学法学院教授 陈瑞华;完善法律援助制度的新思路[N];法制日报;2007年
3 高贞;法律援助制度的实施与发展[N];法制日报;2007年
4 哈尔滨市法律援助中心 刘荣俊;大力完善法律援助制度 努力为构建和谐社会服务[N];哈尔滨日报;2007年
5 中国政法大学诉讼法学研究院副院长 顾永忠;完善我国法律援助制度的几个问题[N];法制日报;2008年
6 赵宏伟 付玉;法律援助制度的建立基础及价值取向[N];吉林日报;2010年
7 司法部副部长 赵大程;让完善的法律援助制度更好地服务社会[N];法制日报;2014年
8 肖贤富;我国法律援助制度与思考[N];中国社会科学院院报;2003年
9 柴瑞娟(作者单位:武汉大学法学院);英美法律援助制度发展概况[N];广西政法报;2002年
10 黄旭东;应进一步完善法律援助制度[N];法制日报;2003年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 陈蓉芳;我国法律援助制度规制与完善对策思考[D];华东政法大学;2008年
2 毛杰;我国法律援助制度的初步研究[D];山东大学;2008年
3 陈海蓉;我国民事法律援助制度研究[D];复旦大学;2008年
4 刘兆阳;我国法律援助制度发展历程概略[D];曲阜师范大学;2009年
5 赵宏伟;论中国特色法律援助制度的建构与完善[D];吉林大学;2009年
6 尹茂平;中国内地与香港特区法律援助制度比较研究[D];暨南大学;2010年
7 廖灿强;“所有人的正义”—英国现代法律援助制度的发展[D];华东政法大学;2009年
8 向章平;完善我国法律援助制度之理性思考[D];湖南师范大学;2009年
9 时怡;法律援助制度中的政府责任研究[D];上海交通大学;2009年
10 陈晨;刑事法律援助制度研究[D];中国人民公安大学;2004年
,本文编号:2177975
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/shehuibaozhanglunwen/2177975.html