基于罗尔斯正义论的我国医疗保障制度改革的伦理思考
[Abstract]:With the continuous advancement of the overall goal of building a well-off society in an all-round way, people's living standards are improving day by day, the problem of food and clothing is gradually solved, and whether the personal rights and interests are guaranteed has gradually risen to the social level that everyone cares about. In particular, the establishment, implementation and reform of the social security system, which involve personal interests, have attracted the attention of Chinese people. With the emergence of a series of medical problems in recent years, such as medical incidents, registered cases, and the plight of returning to poverty due to illness, medical reform has become a hot issue of the two sessions for many years, so it is urgent to alleviate or even solve these medical problems. In the process of medical reform, the basic medical security system plays an irreplaceable role. Undoubtedly, the most important thing in reforming the health care system is to solve the two problems of "who will provide medical services" and "who will pay for medical expenses", especially the issue of "who pays for medical expenses?" This needs to give play to the role of medical security system. Only by exerting the function of medical security system, can we realize the goal of making people have money to see a doctor. However, the fact is that there are many problems in the implementation of our medical security system, among which the most prominent one is fairness. If we cannot properly handle the fairness of our medical security system, Will not play its due role. The fairness of the medical security system in China has existed since the beginning of its establishment. Many experts and scholars have put forward their own views on how to solve this problem from the aspects of social reform, economic construction, government functions, etc. However, there is a lack of ethical analysis. Any institution needs theoretical support, but Rawls' theory of justice has been regarded as an important work of political philosophy and moral ethics since the beginning of its publication. It is of great significance to use this theory for reference in guiding the reform of medical security system. This paper is divided into four parts to discuss the relationship between the reform of medical security system and Rawls' theory of justice. The first part is the preface, which introduces the purpose, significance, research status and innovation of this paper. The second part is to introduce Rawls' theory of justice and brief analysis, through the analysis of justice, fairness, justice and the main content of Rawls' theory of justice, deepen the connotation of Rawls' theory of justice; Through the comparison between Rawls' theory of justice and other ideas of justice, the author points out that the reform of medical security system in our country should draw lessons from Rawls' theory of justice. The third part is the analysis of the current situation of the medical security system in our country, mainly introduces the historical development process of the medical security system of our country, as well as the ethical dilemma existing in the development process, and finds out the reasons for the ethical dilemma in the medical security system of our country. The fourth part is the ethical thinking of medical security system based on Rawls' theory of justice. By analyzing the political and ethical connotation of Rawls' theory of justice, the author points out that drawing lessons from the ethical connotation of Rawls' theory of justice can enlighten the reform of medical security system in China.
【学位授予单位】:广州中医药大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:F842.684
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王黎明;;休谟正义论的影响及对当代中国的现实意义[J];山西财经大学学报;2012年S1期
2 赵德余;;当代西方主流政治伦理学与中国新时期分配政策的发展[J];学习与探索;2009年04期
3 傅强;;平等正义论对公平正义论原则的互镜、批判与重建[J];中共济南市委党校学报;2009年02期
4 董坡;;气候变化对生态脆弱地区居民的影响——以罗尔斯正义论为视角[J];商品与质量;2012年S4期
5 刘富生;张俊;;罗尔斯正义论对我国现行制度的启示[J];知识经济;2010年10期
6 蔡玉华;;罗尔斯的“正义论”及其当代意义[J];经济研究导刊;2012年21期
7 郑睿;;从罗尔斯正义论的角度看流动人口的社会保障[J];现代商业;2009年30期
8 孟小妹;;罗尔斯与诺齐克正义论之评述[J];中国商界(上半月);2009年09期
9 王颖;;浅议罗尔斯正义论[J];网络财富;2010年16期
10 苟卫锋;;罗尔斯正义论思想的现实意义[J];知识经济;2010年14期
相关会议论文 前3条
1 李和佳;;霍耐特与弗洛泽正义论争的问题与实质[A];当代国外马克思主义评论(10)[C];2012年
2 黄玉顺;;儒家正义论——对“义”范畴的现象学阐释[A];中国哲学史学会2004年年会暨中国传统哲学当代价值学术研讨会论文集[C];2004年
3 舒远招;;康德黑格尔死刑正义论的当代审视[A];“西方政治哲学”全国学术研讨会论文汇编[C];2011年
相关重要报纸文章 前3条
1 同济大学政治哲学与法哲学研究所所长 陈家琪 教授;自由、平等和尊严:可共享的价值[N];中国社会科学报;2013年
2 仪征市人民法院马集法庭 徐美菊 陈恺;浅议正义论对我国法制建设的启示[N];江苏经济报;2012年
3 主持人 深圳特区报评论员 尹传刚;“摇号”式公共管理实为“懒政”[N];深圳特区报;2014年
相关硕士学位论文 前7条
1 高琪;基于罗尔斯正义论的我国医疗保障制度改革的伦理思考[D];广州中医药大学;2016年
2 陈学智;休谟利益正义论研究[D];广西师范大学;2008年
3 高璐;正义论视角下沈阳市外来农民工就业问题研究[D];辽宁大学;2012年
4 赵志华;从伦理维度看罗尔斯的正义论[D];西南大学;2006年
5 徐艳艳;罗尔斯正义论道德教育思想的当代启示[D];曲阜师范大学;2013年
6 李琳;无产阶级正义论——《共产党宣言》及其影响研究[D];长安大学;2010年
7 郭晶;罗尔斯程序正义论[D];山东大学;2012年
,本文编号:2386774
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/shehuibaozhanglunwen/2386774.html