论未成年人刑事案件的有限公开审理

发布时间：2018-01-24 05:43

本文关键词： 司法公开有限公开未成年人刑事案件公开审理　出处：《中南大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：摘要：在推动司法公开的背景下,庭审公开、裁判文书公开等内容成为了法院推动司法公开的重要形式。如何处理公开审理与对未成年不公开审理的矛盾关系,如何既实现保护、挽救未成年人罪犯的目的又最大程度地保证程序公正,同时对同龄人起到警示效应,同样成为值得关注和研究的问题。对犯罪未成年人实行“教育、感化、挽救”的方针和“教育为主、惩罚为辅”的原则主导着我国刑事司法政策和具体诉讼制度、程序和规则。未成年人犯罪案件的不公开审理能够实现这些功能和原则,但同时必然对程序公正产生一定影响,并对法律的“预测性”和警示(威慑)功能产生影响。因此,在司法公开背景下讨论未成年人刑事案件的公开审理或许能探索出一条两全其美之路,实现司法公开与保护未成年人的二元效益。
[Abstract]:Absrtact: under the background of promoting judicial openness, the contents of open trial and open judgment documents have become an important form for the court to promote judicial openness. How to deal with the contradiction between open trial and non-public hearing of minors. How to realize the protection, save the juvenile criminals and maximize the guarantee of procedural justice, at the same time to the same age to play a warning effect. It has also become a problem worthy of attention and research. The policy of "education, probation and rescue" and "education as the main principle" should be applied to juvenile delinquents. The principle of "punishment is secondary" dominates our country's criminal justice policy and specific litigation system, procedures and rules. The closed trial of juvenile delinquency cases can realize these functions and principles. But at the same time, it must have a certain impact on procedural justice, and on the "predictability" of the law and the function of warning (deterrence). Under the background of judicial openness, it may be possible to explore a way to achieve the dual benefits of judicial openness and the protection of minors by discussing the open trial of juvenile criminal cases.
【学位授予单位】：中南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.2;C913.5

【参考文献】