亲密关系背叛的性别差异研究

发布时间：2018-02-20 21:56

本文关键词： 亲密关系背叛性别差异进化心理学　出处：《西南大学》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：本文研究所指的亲密关系背叛涉及到恋爱、同居关系和婚姻关系的不忠,并从背叛的三个方面,包括对背叛原因、背叛类型的认知和背叛应对探讨亲密关系背叛的性别差异。研究一在国外已有亲密关系背叛原因量表(INFQ)的基础上,对诱发不同性别背叛的原因数据分别处理,并在初测河修订后形成男性和女性亲密关系背叛原因量表,同时对其信效度进行了检验。研究二在文献综述、已有国内研究和开放式问卷的基础上,形成男性和女性的背叛线索评定量表、目标词和属性词评定量表,进而挑选出用作外显回忆实验的背叛线索句子和用作内隐IAT实验的目标词和属性词,考察男女被试在性背叛线索和感情背叛线索外显回忆和内隐认知上的性别差异。研究三选用以已婚和恋爱群体为被试,考察两性在配偶保持策略上的性别差异,以及男性的配偶价值对女性策略运用的影响。综合研究结果得到如下结论： (1)男性和女性亲密关系背叛原因量表均具有较好的信度和效度。与国外已有的亲密关系背叛原因量表(INFQ)的维度大致相似,都具有主观故意、性爱因素、情感缺失和成长经历四个方面原因。 (2)女性更多的将男性的背叛归为刺激寻求,男性更多的将女性的背叛归为女性太过于现实。被试性别和背叛者性别会同时影响对背叛原因的认识。女性更容易把男性的背叛归为主观故意和性爱因素,而男性更愿意把女性的背叛归为主观故意和性爱因素。而且背叛经历和被试性别在性爱因素、成长经历上存在交互作用。有过背叛经历的男性更容易把背叛原因归为性爱因素和成长经历。这也在一定程度上验证了进化论假设。 (3)男性性背叛线索的回忆量明显多于感情背叛线索的回忆量,支持了进化论假设。但女性的感情背叛线索回忆量少于性背叛线索。两性对感情背叛的内隐态度要比性背叛的内隐态度积极一些。但没有发现两性在这一内隐态度上的明显差异。这一结果也有别于进化假说。 (4)配偶保持策略量表(MRI-SF)在我国具有较高的信效度,两性在策略应用的选择中存在着显著差异。以恋爱和已婚群体为被试的研究结果表明,男性更多的通过提供资源,女性则更多的通过外貌装扮策略留住伴侣,对于想与之共度一生的异性,面对潜在的同性竞争者时,男性会付出更多的努力包括警戒、霸占对方时间、在公共场合表现亲热等策略。在性别的差异性检验中,两性在资源诱惑、性诱惑、暴力、独占时间等的策略使用存在明显的不同。 (5)已婚和恋爱群体在隐藏伴侣、许下誓言、诋毁对手、资源诱惑、性诱惑、外貌吸引、顺从对方和饰物拥有等方面存在差异,其中,恋爱组仅在顺从对方策略得分显著的高于已婚群体。即恋爱中的伴侣要比结婚后的夫妻对对方表现出更多的顺从和宽容。婚后的夫妻要比恋爱时更倾向于隐藏伴侣、强调婚姻的誓言、诋毁对手等。而且,已婚群体的量表总分显著高于恋爱组,这也验证了进化论的假设：对于长期伴侣来说,个体会付出更多的努力留住配偶。 (6)对于策略选择的影响因素中,女性对伴侣配偶价值的感知,会影响其配偶保持策略的应用。认为伴侣配偶价值高的女性,会更多的警戒、隐藏伴侣、诋毁对手、对伴侣的性诱惑、更顺从伴侣和展示饰物等表明与伴侣的彼此拥有。这一点同样也符合了进化论的预期。
[Abstract]:The intimacy betrayal of this study refers to love, cohabitation and marital relationship's disloyalty. From the three aspects of betrayal, including betrayal, betrayal type cognition and betrayal, we discuss gender differences in intimate betrayal.
A study in foreign countries has a close relationship to betray the reason scale (INFQ) on the basis of data processing, respectively, caused by different sex and betrayal, male and female intimate relationship betrayed the reason scale formed in the initial test River after the amendment, and its reliability and validity were tested. The research on the basis of two literature review. Some domestic research and open-ended questionnaire, the formation of male and female infidelity rating scale, target words and word attribute rating scale, and then selected as explicit memory sentences infidelity experiment and IAT experiment used as implicit target words and attributive words, male and female subjects in the study of gender differences of betrayal the clues and emotional infidelity of explicit memory and implicit cognition. Study of three married and love to selected groups, amphoteric maintain gender differences in strategies on the spouse, and the spouses of male to female value The impact of strategy application. The results of the comprehensive study are as follows
Conclusion:
(1) male and female close relationship betrayal causes have good reliability and validity. They are similar to the dimensions of INFQ abroad. They all have four reasons: subjective intention, sexual love, emotional loss and growth experience.
(2) women more male betrayal classified as sensation seeking, more men will betray women classified as women are too realistic. Influence of the participants' gender and gender awareness of betrayal will also betray reasons. Women are more likely to betray men classified as subjective intention and sex factors, while men are more willing to betray women classified as subjective intention and sex factors. And betrayal experience and gender of participants in the sex factors, interaction between the growing experience. There's been a betrayal experienced by men is more likely to cause to experience betrayal for sex and growth factors. This has to a certain extent, verify the evolutionary hypothesis.
(3) male sexual infidelity recalled cues significantly more than the feelings of betrayal recalled clues, support the evolutionary hypothesis. But the female emotional infidelity memories less than sexual infidelity. Both sexes of implicit attitudes towards the feelings of betrayal than implicit attitude of betrayal positive. But there is no obvious difference in gender this implicit attitude. This result is different from the evolutionary hypothesis.
(4) the spouse to maintain strategy scale (MRI-SF) has high reliability and validity in our country, there are significant differences in gender strategies used for the selection. In love and married group as the research subjects. The results showed that the male more by providing resources, women are more through the appearance dress strategy to retain partner. Want to share my whole life with the opposite sex, gay face potential competitors, men will pay more to include alert, occupy their time in public affectionate performance strategy. Gender difference test in both sexes in the source of temptation, temptation, violence, such as the use of exclusive time strategy are obvious the different.
(5) married and love group in the hidden companion, vows, denigrate rivals, resources of temptation, the temptation to attract each other and obedient appearance, have different ornaments, among which the love group only in them strategy scored significantly higher than the married group. That is in love partner than married couples on the other side showed more tolerance and obedience. Married couples than in love tend to hide the partner, emphasize the marriage vows, and discredit opponents. Moreover, the married group scores were significantly higher than in group, which also verified the hypothesis: for long-term couples, individuals will pay more to retain the spouse.
(6) the factors affect the strategy choice, women's perception of mate mate value, will affect their spouses hold strategy application. The high value of the female spouse that partner, will be more alert, hidden partner, denigrate rivals, couples of temptation, more submissive partner and show that with partner ornaments the same with each other. This is also in line with the theory of evolution is expected.

【学位授予单位】：西南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：C913.1

【参考文献】