环境纠纷中的科技专家失责行为分析

发布时间：2018-02-28 11:39

本文关键词： 科技专家失责行为系统整合社会整合　出处：《广东社会科学》2017年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：在环境纠纷中,科技专家成为科学的代表,被社会寄予厚望,但也可能存在失责风险。研究发现,存在依次递进的三类失责行为:一是弹性选择;二是隐瞒观点;三是故意扭曲。科技专家的失责行为源于系统整合漏洞和社会整合不足。前者表现在三个方面,监督体制不完善导致道德失责风险,奖惩体制失当导致法律失责风险,政治权力胁迫产生科学失责风险。后者的问题主要是:道德约束偏弱导致科技专家的弹性选择,科技专家与受害者存在隔阂导致其隐藏信息,经济利益为核心驱动力导致"故意扭曲"行为产生。因此,为了杜绝科技专家的失责行为,社会系统需要一套宽松有度、逻辑严密的顶层设计,实现各子系统之间的功能整合,让科技专家敢于、乐于恪尽职守。
[Abstract]:In environmental disputes, science and technology experts become the representatives of science and technology, which are expected by the society, but they may also have the risk of default. The study found that there are three kinds of default behaviors in turn: one is flexible choice, the other is concealment of point of view; Third, intentional distortion. The default behavior of science and technology experts originates from systematic integration loophole and social integration. The former is manifested in three aspects, the imperfect supervision system leads to moral default risk, the reward and punishment system misconduct leads to legal default risk. The problems of the latter are that weak moral constraints lead to flexible selection of science and technology experts, and the gap between scientific experts and victims leads to hidden information. Therefore, in order to put an end to the dereliction of duty of science and technology experts, the social system needs a set of loose and logical top-level design to realize the functional integration between subsystems. Let science and technology experts dare and be willing to fulfill their duties.
【作者单位】：河海大学公共管理学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金“江浙沪沿海工业污染的社会风险研究”(项目编号13BSH026) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目“长三角地区环境问题的社会学研究”(项目编号2015B10814) “江南水乡村庄环境治理的社会机制研究”(项目编号26120162016B32614)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：C912.6

【相似文献】