不同类型社区社会组织对社会资本形成的影响

发布时间：2018-03-07 07:13

本文选题：社区社会组织　切入点：组织类型　出处：《城市问题》2017年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：有研究指出,帕特南等对社会组织和社会资本关系的分析并不充分,没有考虑到社会组织类型对居民积累社会资本的不同作用。基于这一现状,区分了公益性、互益性和混合性三类社区社会组织,并针对这三类社区社会组织在3个城市的6个社区进行了入户问卷调查。调查数据的回归结果显示:由于不同社区社会组织的关注焦点和价值观念不同,社会资本的形成路径也有所差别;公民参与公益性组织与公民意识的养成密不可分;公民参与互益性组织和社会联结、互惠性规范的生成有显著的相关关系;公民参与混合性组织能够促进公民意识、强纽带的社会联系和互惠性规范的积累。据此认为,政府应该在加强监管的同时,鼓励多种类型社区社会组织的共同发展,这将有助于社会资本的形成,进而促进社区的建设。
[Abstract]:Some studies have pointed out that Patnam's analysis of the relationship between social organizations and social capital is inadequate and does not take into account the different effects of social organization types on the accumulation of social capital by residents. There are three kinds of community social organizations of mutual benefit and mixed nature, A questionnaire survey was conducted in 6 communities of these three communities in three cities. The regression results of the survey data show that different community social organizations have different focus of attention and different values. The formation path of social capital is also different; citizen participation in public welfare organization is closely related to citizen consciousness; citizen participation in mutual benefit organization and social connection; Citizen participation in mixed organizations can promote civic awareness, strong social ties and the accumulation of reciprocal norms. Therefore, the government should strengthen supervision and encourage the common development of various types of community social organizations. This will contribute to the formation of social capital, and then promote the construction of communities.
【作者单位】：清华大学公共管理学院;首都经济贸易大学城市经济与公共管理学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目(14CGL076)
【分类号】：C912.2;C912.3

【相似文献】