“一带一路”的知识转向与西部社会学研究的新视野

发布时间：2018-03-14 07:02

本文选题：“一带一路”　切入点：知识转向　出处：《河北学刊》2017年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：目前的"一带一路"研究并未真正地触及其知识内核。即对现有关于世界秩序的知识体系而言,"一带一路"意味了何种的知识取向和知识转向?而中国与西方已有的知识遗产——"天下主义"、"殖民主义的帝国主义秩序"——都存在着一定的"中心主义"思维,即站在自身的角度去"定义"和"规训"世界,从而局限于"中心—边缘"的陈旧模式。另外,近代资本主义世界体系又是一种基于民族—国家的世界体系,而另一种知识遗产——"万隆精神"则强烈地表现出了一种"世界主义"的关怀,然而这种知识遗产在新自由主义主导的全球市场体系中却又不可避免地失落了。"一带一路"战略则在知识层面上提出了一种转向的可能,即消弭原有世界体系中的"边缘"的"边缘性",以"时空重塑"为理论诉求,为超越以民族—国家为根基的世界体系,建立以社会层面的合作为基础的世界体系提供了一种可能的知识。
[Abstract]:The current study of "Belt and Road" has not really touched the core of its knowledge. That is, what knowledge orientation and knowledge turn does "Belt and Road" mean for the existing knowledge system on the world order? However, the intellectual heritage of China and the West-"the doctrine of the world" and "the imperialist order of colonialism"-all have certain "centralism" thinking, that is, to "define" and "discipline" the world from their own point of view. Therefore, it is limited to the old pattern of "central-marginal". In addition, the modern capitalist world system is also a kind of world system based on nation and state. The other intellectual heritage, Wan Long's Spirit, showed a strong concern for cosmopolitanism. However, this intellectual legacy is inevitably lost in the neoliberal global market system. Belt and Road's strategy, on the other hand, puts forward a possibility of turning around at the intellectual level. That is, to eliminate the "edge" of the original world system, to take "space and time remodeling" as the theoretical appeal, and to transcend the world system based on the nation and state. The establishment of a world system based on cooperation at the social level provides a possible knowledge.
【作者单位】：兰州大学哲学社会学院;兰州大学历史文化学院西北少数民族研究中心;
【基金】：2014年度国家社会科学基金重点项目《西部社会学的理论、方法和议题研究》(14ASH003)
【分类号】：C91

【相似文献】