亲贫式支出与居民幸福感的关系研究

发布时间：2018-03-16 04:03

本文选题：财政支出　切入点：亲贫式支出　出处：《吉林大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：亲贫式支出是关乎国计民生的至关重要的财政支出,相对于其他财政支出主要是为经济增长服务的,这一财政支出有明显的亲贫特性,也就是说在促进社会更公平方向发展方面,它占据关键性的地位。本文研究的核心是通过构建有序概率模型来探讨亲贫式支出与幸福之间的关系以及亲贫式支出的最优规模,并进一步根据收入水平、地域、经济发展水平人群进行分层实证分析亲贫式支出与主观幸福感之间的关系,试图弥补国内外在研究亲贫式支出和幸福感关系中存在的不足,更为深入和全面地探讨亲贫式支出能使居民幸福感达到最优的规模,并给出相应的指导性的政策建议。本文统共分为四章:第一章绪论主要阐述关于亲贫式支出与主观幸福感的研究背景与研究意义,深入认识如何通过亲贫式支出解决人们的幸福困惑,然后对有关收入与主观幸福感、财政支出与主观幸福感以及亲贫式与主观幸福感的相书关文献进行系统的梳理和概述。最后介绍本文的研究思路与方法,并指出本文的创新点和不足之处。第二章为我国居民主观幸福感与亲贫式支出的现状分析,首先通过分析当前中国经济增长与居民主观幸福感提高不同步现状,探究国家调整财政支出结构解决人民群众的幸福困惑的可行性。其次,具体分析亲贫式支出影响主观幸福感的影响机制,进而提出如何调整亲贫式支出的规模和结构。第三章为亲贫式支出对主观幸福感影响的实证分析,首先通过构建有序概率模型分析亲贫式支出对于主观幸福感的影响,着重研究亲贫式支出的总体规模和内在组成部分对于主观幸福感的影响,其次根据相对收入状况、地区和经济发展水平对居民主观幸福感的异质性进行分析和阐释。最后根据亲贫式支出与居民主观幸福感的曲线关系,验证是否存在一个基于居民幸福感最大化的最优的亲贫式支出规模。第四章为亲贫式支出与居民主观幸福感关系的政策建议。文章对实证分析得到的结论加以总结,并提出如何通过调整亲贫式支出的规模和结构来提高居民主观幸福感的政策建议。本文最终得出以下结论:(1)亲贫式支出对居民主观幸福感有显著的提升作用。(2)社会保障支出和教育支出与居民幸福感存在正向促进作用,而医疗支出反而对居民幸福感存在阻碍作用。(3)低收入的主观幸福感水平受到教育和社会保障支出的提升作用更强;东部地区的居民幸福感水平的提高主要受益于教育支出,中部地区的居民幸福感水平的提高主要受益于社会保障支出,而西部地区的居民幸福感水平的提高主要受益于医疗支出;亲贫式支出对欠发达地区的居民幸福感水平的提升作用会更强。不发达地区更依赖社会保障支出和医疗支出,而发达地区则更偏好教育支出。(4)最优亲贫式支出规模为4359.99元/人。本文通过实证分析2012年我国亲贫式支出对主观幸福感水平的影响,从财政支出结构的优化的角度来分析亲贫式支出对主观幸福感的影响,并分析评估了亲贫式支出内部组成部分对主观幸福感的促进效应,进而探究亲贫式支出的总体最优规模,从而实现居民主观幸福感的提升。
[Abstract]:Pro poor spending is crucial to the beneficial to the people's livelihood expenditure relative to other major financial expenditure is to serve economic growth, the fiscal expenditure has the obvious characteristics of the pro poor, that is to say in promoting social fairness more direction, it occupies a key position. The core of this paper is through the construction of the ordered probability model to probe into the relationship between the pro poor expenditure and happiness and the optimal scale of Pro poor expenditure, and further according to the income level, regional, hierarchical empirical analysis of the relationship between pro poor expenditure and subjective well-being of the economic development level of population, trying to make up for the domestic and foreign research of Pro poor expenditure and lack of well-being relationship the more in-depth and comprehensive exploration of Pro poor expenditure can make the residents' happiness reached the optimal scale, and gives the corresponding practical suggestions. This paper Total is divided into four chapters: the first chapter is the introduction mainly expounds the background and significance of the research on Pro poor expenditure and subjective well-being, in-depth understanding of how the pro poor expenditure to solve people's happiness and confusion, the income and subjective well-being, fiscal expenditure and subjective well-being and pro poor and subjective well-being the book off a literature review and overview of the system. Finally, introduces the ideas and methods of this research, and points out the innovation and shortcomings of this paper. The second chapter is the analysis of the status quo of Pro poor expenditure of the subjective well-being of residents in China, first through the analysis of the current situation is not synchronized China sense to improve economic growth and subjective happy people, explore the country adjust the fiscal expenditure structure to solve the feasibility happiness confused people. Secondly, the influence mechanism of the specific analysis of Pro poor expenditure influence subjective well-being, then proposed the How to adjust the size and structure of Pro poor expenditure. The third chapter is the empirical analysis of Pro poor expenditure impact on subjective well-being, first through the construction of the ordered probability model of Pro poor expenditure impact on subjective well-being, focuses on Pro poor expenditure scale and in part to affect the subjective well-being. Secondly, according to the relative income, area and the level of economic development to the analysis and interpretation of the heterogeneity of people's subjective well-being. According to the relation curve between expenditure and pro poor people's subjective well-being, verify the existence of a pro poor expenditure scale optimal maximum happiness. The fourth chapter is based on Pro poor expenditure and subjective well-being of the relationship between policy recommendations. The summary of conclusions of empirical analysis of scale and structure, and puts forward how to pro poor expenditure by adjusting the To improve the subjective well-being of citizens in policy recommendations. This paper concluded the following conclusions: (1) pro poor expenditure on residents subjective well-being has significantly improved function. (2) social security expenditure and education expenditure and residents' happiness has a positive role in promoting, and medical expenses and anti hindering effect on Residents' happiness. (3) the low income level of subjective well-being is stronger to enhance the role of education and social security expenditure; level of the eastern region to improve residents' happiness mainly benefited from the education expenditure, the central region of the level of happiness increase mainly benefited from the social security expenditure, while the western region residents to raise the level of happiness the main benefit of medical expenditure; enhance the level of Pro poor expenditure to the underdeveloped areas of the residents' happiness will be stronger. The underdeveloped areas are more dependent on social security expenditure and medical expenses, and developed In preference for educational expenditure. (4) the optimal Pro poor expenditure scale is 4359.99 yuan / person. This paper analyzes the impact of the 2012 China's Pro poor expenditure on subjective well-being level through the empirical study, from the optimization of the fiscal expenditure structure of Pro poor expenditure on subjective well-being, and analysis evaluation of the internal part of propoor spending on subjective well-being promotion effect, and explore the optimal overall scale of Pro poor expenditure, so as to realize the residents' subjective well-being.

【学位授予单位】：吉林大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：C912.6;F812.45

【相似文献】