负面清单行业限制程度的测度方法与评价体系
发布时间:2018-04-14 05:37
本文选题:负面清单 + 不符措施 ; 参考:《统计研究》2017年02期
【摘要】:本文以美国FTA各签约方的17个负面清单为样本,依据负面清单文本信息,定量刻画了各国负面清单的行业限制范围和限制强度,并将其转化为分别以ISIC4.0二、三和四分位行业代码为统计口径的规范国别行业面板数据。基于上述数据,本文构建了负面清单行业覆盖率、行业限制精准度、标准累积限制强度、行业核心度、国家向核心度和负面清单相似度等一系列指标,分析了美国FTA各签约方负面清单行业限制范围和限制强度的整体特征及国别特征,并与中国自由贸易试验区统一负面清单进行了比较。在此基础上,提出了改进和完善中国负面清单的相应政策建议。
[Abstract]:This paper takes 17 negative lists of each FTA signatory as samples, according to the negative list text information, describes quantitatively the scope and intensity of industry restriction of each country's negative list, and transforms it into ISIC4.0 II, respectively.Three and four quartile industry codes for statistical caliber of standardized country-specific industry panel data.Based on the above data, this paper constructs a series of indicators, such as negative list industry coverage, industry restriction precision, standard cumulative restriction intensity, industry core degree, national core degree and negative list similarity, etc.This paper analyzes the overall characteristics and national characteristics of the scope and intensity of the negative list of American FTA signatories, and compares it with the unified negative list of China Free Trade Test area.On this basis, the corresponding policy recommendations for improving and perfecting China's negative list are put forward.
【作者单位】: 天津财经大学国际经济贸易系;
【分类号】:F757.12;F752;C81
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 闭晓君;黄子真;史瑞芬;;护理毕业生就业排斥问题调查分析[J];护理学报;2009年23期
,本文编号:1747968
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/shgj/1747968.html