当前位置:主页 > 社科论文 > 社会学论文 >

社会网络视角下网民信息权力研究

发布时间:2018-04-20 16:16

  本文选题:社会网络 + 社会资本 ; 参考:《上海师范大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:随着信息技术和自媒体的迅猛发展,互联网普及率的不断提升,网民规模不断壮大,网络社会的崛起使得网络空间中网民的互动更加频繁和有效。网民信息权力是普通网民与网络意见领袖在网络空间的脱域交往互动中衍生出的微型权力。它与政府权力正在不断的发生着对话和碰撞,并且直接作用和影响现实社会的实践,它对现实场域政治生态的影响越来越大。本文运用社会网络理论对网民信息权力进行解读,对其概念进行界定,阐释其内涵。根据社会网络分析方法中的中心度,对网民信息权力进行量化分析。选取网民信息权力的表现形式,网络反腐和网络群体性事件中的网民互动分析,测算互动网络中网民信息权力的作用大小。通过测算结果综合分析网民信息权力的影响因素,明确权力的生成路径,与政府权力的关系,以及社会效应。以此应对网民信息权力的非制度化运作所带来的负面影响,让其更好的在制度化轨道内运行,促进网络社会的和谐发展。本文的研究结论如下:第一,网民信息权力是网民在互联网平台上,通过信息传递,在彼此网络互动关系中形成的对他人和社会的影响力。其影响因素主要包括四个方面:网络互动、知识能力、社会资本以及网络位置。网络互动是权力网络生成的基础,知识能力是网民信息权力作用的关键、社会资本是决定网民信息权力大小的核心,网络位置是网民信息权力生成的重点。第二,网民信息权力的作用路径是网络空间或现实社会的热点事件作为导火索,引发普通网民和网络意见领袖的互动热议,以多元的互动形式,推进事件发展。普通网民依赖于知识能力扩大话语影响力,网络意见领袖依赖于社会资本在网络权力体系中占有较大话语权。网民在不同的网络位置占有不同的社会资本,最终决定自己话语权力的大小。网络共识达成以后网民信息权力得以和现实社会产生对接,话语作用影响下倒逼相关政府部门的介入,促进问题的解决和事件的平息,或者进一步的讨论。第三,网民信息权力与政府权力有很多不同,网民信息权力的权力主体更加多元;权力特征更为弥散和隐蔽;权力场域游走于网络平台和现实社会;运作方式更为离散和高效;表现形式更为多元和直接。但两者并不对立,两者能够实现有效对话,良性互动和信息共享,推进官方和民间的话语网络的连接,回应和引导网民关心的热点问题和事件,解决相关问题,引导社会舆情正向的发展。第四,网民信息权力有利于拓宽民众民主参与途径,促进对政府权力的监督;有利于基层群众参与社会治理,利用多种途径发声,表达民众意志;有利于推进网络时代社会权力结构的再分配。然而它也存在网络暴力、民主参与不平等和权力滥用等问题,需要得到对应的措施规制。夯实基础,加强网络空间的相关法律法规,完善政府网络回应机制;解决关键,提升网民的知识能力和综合素养,合理合法使用好网络平台;紧抓核心,提高社会资本,积极培育网络意见领袖;突出重点,加强对网络信息的研判和管理,强化对网络民意的引导。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of information technology and self media, the popularity of Internet is increasing, the scale of Internet users is growing, and the rise of Internet society makes the interaction of Internet users more frequent and effective. The information power of Internet users is the micro rights derived from the interaction and interaction of Internet users and network opinion leaders in the network space. It has a continuous dialogue and collision with the government power, and it directly affects and affects the practice of the real society. It has more and more influence on the real field of political ecology. This paper uses social network theory to interpret the information power of netizens, defines its concept and explains its connotation. According to the social network analysis method, this paper makes an analysis of its connotation. The central degree of the Chinese netizen's information power is quantified and analyzed. The form of the information power of the netizen, the Network Anti-corruption and the interaction analysis of the Internet users are analyzed, and the effect of the information power of the Internet users in the interactive network is calculated. The influence factors of the information power of the netizens are synthetically analyzed by the calculation results, and the generation of the power is made clear. The path, the relationship with the government power, and the social effect, in order to deal with the negative influence brought by the non institutionalized operation of the information power of the netizens, let it run better in the institutionalized orbit and promote the harmonious development of the network society. The conclusions of this paper are as follows: first, the information power of the people is on the Internet platform, through the letter of the Internet. The influence of interest transmission on other people and society in the interaction of each other network. The influence factors mainly include four aspects: network interaction, knowledge ability, social capital and network position. Network interaction is the basis of power network generation, knowledge ability is the key to the function of network people's trust and interest, and social capital is the decision of the network. The core of the size of the interest power, the network position is the focal point of the information power generation of the netizens. Second, the action path of the information power of the netizens is the hot event of the network space or the real society, triggering the interactive hot discussion of the ordinary netizens and the network opinion leaders, and promoting the development of the events by the multi interaction form. The ordinary netizen depends on the knowledge. The network opinion leader relies on the social capital in the network power system. The Internet users occupy different social capital in different network positions, and ultimately determine the power of their own discourse. After the consensus is reached, the information power of the netizens can be butted with the real society. Under the influence, the intervention of the relevant government departments should be forced to promote the solution of the problem and the peace of the event, or further discussion. Third, the information power of the netizens is different from the government power, the power subject of the netizen's information power is more pluralistic; the power characteristics are more diffuse and concealed; the power field travels on the network platform and the real society; The mode is more discrete and efficient; the form of expression is more pluralistic and direct. But the two are not antagonistic. Both can achieve effective dialogue, benign interaction and information sharing, promote the connection of official and folk discourse networks, respond and guide the hot issues and events concerned by the netizens, solve related problems and guide the positive development of social public opinion. Fourth, the information power of the netizens is beneficial to widening the way of public participation in democratic participation and promoting the supervision of the power of the government; it is beneficial to the grassroots people to participate in the social governance, the use of various channels to voice, the expression of the will of the people, and the promotion of the redistribution of the social power structure in the network age. However, it also has network violence, democratic participation is unequal and power. Abuse and other problems need to be regulated by corresponding measures. Consolidate the foundation, strengthen the relevant laws and regulations of the network space, improve the response mechanism of the government network, solve the key, improve the knowledge ability and comprehensive quality of the netizens, rationally and legitimately use the network platform; grasp the core, improve the social capital, cultivate the network opinion leaders and highlight the key points. We should strengthen the judgement and management of network information and strengthen the guidance of Internet public opinion.

【学位授予单位】:上海师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:C913.4

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 杨帆;;网络化时代公民信息权力的建构和演变——基于网络流行语的话语分析[J];美与时代(城市版);2016年04期

2 梅梅;何明升;;网络集体行动的意义建构——基于斯图亚特·霍尔的编码-解码理论的分析[J];南京邮电大学学报(社会科学版);2015年03期

3 陈氚;;网络权力变迁中的国家机遇[J];中共中央党校学报;2015年03期

4 肖扬伟;;网络反腐:认知态度与政策建议——基于201名领导干部和215名普通网民的调查数据分析[J];中州学刊;2015年01期

5 白淑英;牛鸽军;;微博社区中的网络结构与权力分配[J];湖南师范大学社会科学学报;2014年06期

6 熊光清;;网络公共领域的兴起与话语民主的新发展[J];中国人民大学学报;2014年05期

7 安孟竹;;网络社会中的权力概观——基于福柯的微观权力理论视角[J];荆楚学刊;2014年03期

8 何哲;;网络社会的基本特性及其公共治理策略[J];甘肃行政学院学报;2014年03期

9 石劲松;王婷;;论网络时代的权力话语[J];北京青年政治学院学报;2013年04期

10 刘少杰;;网络化时代的社会转型与研究方式[J];学习与探索;2013年07期

相关博士学位论文 前4条

1 童希;微博上的公共事务意见领袖[D];复旦大学;2013年

2 梁美妍;话语民主与微观权力:虚拟公民社会研究[D];黑龙江大学;2012年

3 张淑华;权利与权力双重视角下的网络民意与公共决策[D];华中科技大学;2008年

4 邹军;虚拟世界的民间表达[D];复旦大学;2008年

相关硕士学位论文 前5条

1 王婧;微博传播赋权及其影响研究[D];成都理工大学;2014年

2 李亚勇;自媒体赋权失控研究[D];辽宁大学;2014年

3 赵丽平;网络社区中的权力表现[D];山东大学;2012年

4 易慧频;网络公共领域中权利与权力的博弈[D];华中师范大学;2011年

5 伍林;福柯理论视角下网络媒体中的权力关系及博弈研究[D];重庆大学;2010年



本文编号:1778521

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/shgj/1778521.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户49cf2***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com