社会科学的自然主义进路何以可能——兼论塞尔的解决方案

发布时间：2018-04-21 11:02

本文选题：自然主义 + 社会科学哲学　；参考：《科学技术哲学研究》2016年05期

【摘要】：将自然科学的方法范式引入社会科学的自然主义进路,由于坚持了自然科学的公共性、可重复性和价值中立原则,保证了社会科学可以以一门科学的形式发展,因而成了当今社会科学哲学的主流,这一进路的合法性也得到了越来越多的实践证明和学者的认可。但与此同时,以诠释学和实用主义为代表的非自然主义进路则认为社会科学和自然科学之间存在着本体论层面的张力,社会科学的复杂性和独特性使其难以采取自然科学的方法范式,据此自然主义进路发出挑战。塞尔在吸收这些批判的基础上,坚持自然主义原则,从集体意向性出发,建构了一种旨在中和社会科学的独特性和自然主义方法论之间的矛盾的社会实在论。塞尔的这一思路可以作为自然主义社会科学哲学的一种出路。
[Abstract]:By introducing the method paradigm of natural science into the naturalism approach of social science, the principles of publicness, repeatability and value neutrality of natural science are adhered to, which ensures that social science can develop in the form of a science. As a result, it has become the mainstream of social science philosophy, and the legitimacy of this approach has been proved by more and more practice and recognized by scholars. But at the same time, the non-naturalistic approach, represented by hermeneutics and pragmatism, holds that there is an ontological tension between social science and natural science. The complexity and uniqueness of social science make it difficult to adopt the method paradigm of natural science. On the basis of absorbing these criticisms and adhering to the principle of naturalism, Searle constructed a kind of social realism aimed at neutralizing the contradiction between the uniqueness of social sciences and the methodology of naturalism from the perspective of collective intentionality. This idea can be regarded as a way out of naturalistic social science philosophy.
【作者单位】：山西大学科学技术哲学研究中心;
【基金】：教育部人文社科重点研究基地重大项目(15JJD720010) 国家社会科学基金重点项目(12AZX004) 山西省三晋学者支持计划
【分类号】：C02

【相似文献】